Created

Last reply

Replies

727

Views

12.3k

Users

2

Likes

3

Frequent Posters

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmDxJrggie8

Luther Vandross - Dance With My Father (Official Video)


Lyrics

Back when I was a child

Before life removed all the innocence

My father would lift me up

And dance with my mother and me and then

Spin me around 'til I fell asleep

Then up the stairs he would carry me

And I knew for sure

I was loved

If I could get another chance

Another walk

Another dance with him

I'd play a song that would never ever end

How I'd love, love, love

To dance with my father again

Ooh

When I and my mother would disagree

To get my way, I would run from her to him

He'd make me laugh just to comfort me, yeah-yeah

Then finally make me do just what my mama said

Later that when I was asleep

He left a dollar under my sheet

Never dreamed that he

Would be gone from me

If I could steal one final glance

One final step

One final dance with him

I'd play a song that would never ever end

'Cause I'd love, love, love

To dance with my father again

Sometimes I'd listen outside her door

And I'd hear how mama would cry for him

I'd pray for her even more than me

I'd pray for her even more than me

I know I'm praying for much, too much

But could You send back the only man she loved

I know You don't do it usually

But dear Lord, she's dying to dance with my father again

Every night, I fall asleep

And this is all I ever dream

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago


THIS IS A "MEMBERS ONLY" POST
The Author of this post have chosen to restrict the content of this Post to members only.


satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago

*" Lest We Forget*

The month of November 1971, 52 years ago, Very important events were happening in our country.

I got this write up and speech that follows that refreshened the history...

The year was 1971 and the month November.

“If India pokes its nose in Pakistan, US will not keep its trap shut. India will be taught a lesson.”

- Richard Nixon

*“India regards America as a friend. Not a boss. India is capable of writing its own destiny. We know and are aware how to deal with each one according to circumstances.”*

- Indira Gandhi

*Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi articulated these exact words sitting with the US President Richard Nixon in the White House, while maintaining an eye-to-eye contact.* This incident was narrated by the then Secretary of State and NSA, Henry Kissinger, in his autobiography.

That was the day when the Indo-US joint media address was cancelled by Indira Gandhi who walked away from the White House in her inimitable style.

Kissinger, while ushering Indira Gandhi into her car, had commented, "Madam Prime Minister, don't you feel you could have been a little more patient with the President?"

Indira Gandhi replied, *"Thank you, Mr. Secretary, for your valuable suggestion. Being a developing country, we have our backbones straight - & enough will and resources to fight all atrocities. We shall prove that days are gone when a power can rule and often control any nation from thousands of miles away.”*

Thereafter, as soon as her Air India Boeing touched down at Palam runway in Delhi, Indira Gandhi summoned the leader of the opposition, Atal Behari Vajpayee to her residence.

Post an hour of discussion behind closed doors, Vajpayee was seen hurrying back. It was thereafter known that Vajpayee would be representing India at the United Nations.

Donald Paul of BBC had jumped in with a question to Vajpayee, "Indira ji regards you as a staunch critic. In spite of that, are you sure you'd be at the United Nations shouting your throat (voice) out in favour of the Incumbent Government?”

*Vajpayee had a repartee.. "A rose adorns a garden, so does a Lily. Each is beset with the idea that they are individually the most beautiful. When the garden falls in a crisis, it's no secret that the garden has to safeguard its beauty as one. I have come today to save the garden. This is called Indian Democracy."*

The resultant history is all known to us. America sent 270 famed Patton tanks to Pakistan. They called the world media to demonstrate that these tanks were produced under exclusive technology, and are/were thus indestructible. The intention was very clear. This was a warning signal to the rest of the world that no one should help India.

America did not stop here. Burma-Shell the only US company supplying oil to India, was told to stop. They were sternly told by US to cease dealing with India anymore.

India's history thereafter was only about fighting back. Indira Gandhi's incisive diplomacy ensured oil came in from Ukraine.

A battle that lasted just a day destroyed a majority of the 270 Patton tanks, in the Thar Desert. The destroyed tanks were brought into India for display at traffic crossings. The hot deserts of Rajasthan still stands as a witness where US pride was decimated.

A war that lasted eighteen days thereafter culminated in the capture of 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war.

Mujibur Rahman was released from Lahore Jail.

The month now was March - Indira Gandhi recognized Bangladesh as an independent nation in the Indian Parliament.

*Vajpayee addressed Indira Gandhi as “Maa Durga.”*

These events had a packet of long lasting manifested fallouts.

— India's own oil company, viz. Indian Oil came into being.

— India expressed itself as a nation of strength in the eyes of the world.

— India led the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) from the front. Its leadership was unquestioned.

Times and events of such strength however did get submerged into the great depths of yore and lore.

Truthful history till date nevertheless remains as a baton that needs to be passed down generations.

*This year is the 52nd anniversary of the Indo Pak Bangladesh war. Our children must read this, lest we forget.*

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/can-you-read-this-cursive-handwriting-the-national-archives-wants-your-help-180985833/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=pocket_hits&utm_campaign=POCKET_HITS-EN-DAILY-SPONSORED&GEORGETOWNUNIV-2025_01_23=&sponsored=0&position=4&category=fascinating_stories&scheduled_corpus_item_id=133b7918-fb37-4083-97a0-dcbfa2b7ced0&url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/can-you-read-this-cursive-handwriting-the-national-archives-wants-your-help-180985833/

Can You Read This Cursive Handwriting? The National Archives Wants Your Help

Anyone with an internet connection can volunteer to transcribe historical documents and help make the archives’ digital catalog more accessible

By Sarah Kuta - Daily Correspondent

The National Archives is brimming with historical documents written in cursive, including some that date back more than 200 years. But these texts can be difficult to read and understand— particularly for Americans who never learned cursive in school.

That’s why the National Archives is looking for volunteers who can help transcribe and organize its many handwritten records: The goal of the Citizen Archivist program is to help “unlock history” by making digital documents more accessible, according to the project’s website.

Every year, the National Archives digitizes tens of millions of records. The agency uses artificial intelligence and a technology known as optical character recognition to extract text from historical documents. But these methods don’t always work, and they aren’t always accurate.

That’s where human volunteers come in. By transcribing digital pages, volunteers make it easier for scholars, genealogists and curious history buffs to find and read historical documents.

Getting started is easy: All you need to do is sign up online. The free program is open to anyone with an internet connection.

“There’s no application,” Suzanne Isaacs, a community manager with the National Archives, tells USA Today’s Elizabeth Weise. “You just pick a record that hasn’t been done and read the instructions. It’s easy to do for a half hour a day or a week.”

If you’re not confident in your cursive deciphering skills, the National Archives has other tasks available, too—such as “tagging” documents that other volunteers have already transcribed. Tagging helps improve the searchability of records.

Already, more than 5,000 volunteers have joined the Citizen Archivist program. Many are hard at work on “missions,” or groups of documents that need transcribing and tagging. For example, current missions include Revolutionary War pension files and employee contracts from 1866 to 1870.

The Revolutionary War mission, which kicked off in June 2023 in partnership with the National Park Service (NPS), includes files connected to more than 80,000 veterans and their widows.

“The pensions are revealing the stunning—frequently heartbreaking and sometimes funny—complexity, nuance and previously unknown details about the American Revolution and the nation in the decades after,” says Joanne Blacoe, an interpretation planner for the NPS, in a statement. “It’s rich content that will benefit [national] parks and inspire artists, researchers and families connecting to ancestors.”

Volunteers can spend as much or as little time as they want transcribing and tagging. Some participants have dedicated years of their lives to the program—like Alex Smith, a retiree from Pennsylvania. Over nine years, he transcribed more than 100,000 documents, as WTOP’s Kate Ryan reported in March 2024.

“I was looking for something to give purpose, and could give some structure to my retired life,” he said. “It was just perfect.”

For Smith, the transcription work is also a chance to peer back in time and connect with Americans of the past. He’s been surprised by some documents, like a note inviting Gerald Ford to join the Green Bay Packers, and moved by others, like Civil War pension records.

“You’re seeing people in desperate straits,” Smith told WTOP. “They’re trying desperately to get some reasonable pension paid to them, and you think, ‘These are individual tragedies.’”

Though cursive instruction was once standard, today’s educators and lawmakers are divided: Should schools emphasize penmanship or keyboard skills? But even as laptops, tablets and other devices become more ubiquitous, cursive is making a comeback. More than 20 states now require schools to teach cursive, according to Education Week’s Brooke Schultz.

In California, a law mandating cursive instruction took effect in January 2024.

“For some students, it’s a great alternative to printing, and it helps them be more accurate and more careful with the writing,” Erica Ingber, principal of Longfellow Elementary School in Pasadena, told the Los Angeles Times’ Howard Blume last year. “And then for others, it’s just another thing that is difficult for them.”

A few months later, another law requiring cursive instruction passed in Kentucky.

“We don’t want this to become a lost art,” Sean Howard, superintendent of Kentucky’s Ashland Independent School District, told WSAZ’s Abbey Lord in August 2024. “There is research that connects the ability to read and fluency … to the ability to write cursive.”

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-sit-up-is-over?utm_medium=email&utm_source=pocket_hits&utm_campaign=POCKET_HITS-EN-DAILY-SPONSORED&GEORGETOWNUNIV-2025_01_23=&sponsored=0&position=10&category=fascinating_stories&scheduled_corpus_item_id=c5255804-a5ca-4347-8f37-eb83aa6fdce8&url=https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-sit-up-is-over

The Sit-Up Is Over

It used to dominate American fitness practice. Now it’s all but over.

By Amanda Mull

When I think of a sit-up, my mind flashes immediately to the (carpeted, for some reason) floor of my elementary-school gym. Twice a week, our teachers marched us there for ritual humiliation and light calisthenics, and under the watchful gaze of a former football coach with a whistle perpetually dangling from his lips, we’d warm up with the moves we’d been told were the building blocks of physical fitness—jumping jacks, push-ups, toe touches, and, of course, sit-ups.

With rare exception, we were bad at sit-ups. We’d try our best, taking turns leaning on our partners’ toes as they threw their torsos up and forward for a count of 10. But kids are floppy creatures, and sit-ups are an especially floppy exercise. In gym class, our lower backs hunched, our necks strained, and our arms flew away from their cross-chest Dracula pose. Once a year, beginning in elementary school, the Presidential Fitness Test required us to do as many sit-ups in a minute as our little bodies could stand. Eventually we were introduced to crunches, a truncated variation of the sit-up that made our by-then-adolescent flailing a bit less dramatic.

The idea behind those lessons had been the same for generations: Doing sit-ups or crunches at a high volume is not just a reliable way to build physical strength, but a reliable way to measure it. As both a unit of exercise and a way of life, the sit-up was endorsed by the only kinds of fitness experts most people had access to at the time—gym teachers, my exercise-nut dad, the hardbodies in 1990s fitness informercials hawking questionably efficacious gadgets such as the Ab Roller. To question its utility would have felt only slightly less bizarre than questioning whether humans benefit from going for a little jog. But by the time I aged out of gym class, in the mid-2000s, the sit-up had already begun its quiet disappearance from American fitness. In the years that followed, this iconic exercise would yield its status further. Old-school exercisers may be surprised to hear that this fall from grace is now complete. The sit-up is over.

The institutional push to get Americans to exercise started in the 19th century, when federal authorities feared that new kinds of work and mass urban migration were turning a nation of hearty farmworkers into one of sedentary city folk. The situation was regarded as nothing less than a national-security risk—a physically weak nation supplied its military with weak soldiers. These anxieties have long influenced American ideas about fitness, and cemented the link between military exercise practices and civilian exercise trends. So it was that the sit-up, which has been around in one form or another since antiquity, did not fully conquer America until the early 1940s, when the United States Army enshrined it in cadets’ physical training and testing. That decision all but guaranteed that children would be flopping around on the floor at school for the better part of a century afterward. In later years, the U.S. Navy and Marines endorsed the crunch. Whichever variation was in play, military personnel had to complete as many as possible in two minutes—double the time that would later be assigned to grade-schoolers, but otherwise the same test.

Our understanding of how the body moves and gains strength has evolved, to put it mildly, in the past 80 years or so. When researchers of old sought to understand the body, they considered its elements separately. “Anatomists would remove the connective tissue around the muscles,” Pete McCall, a personal trainer and fitness educator who has trained instructors for the National Academy of Sports Medicine and the American Council on Exercise, told me. Then they would observe and manipulate the muscles lying flat. That, McCall said, is how they decided that your abdominals pull your spine around, and that your abdominals need to pull your spine around a lot in order to get and stay strong.

Now we know that muscles don’t function alone. Abs are the most visible muscles in a ripped midsection, but they work in concert with a slew of others, including the diaphragm, obliques, erector spinae, and the muscles of the pelvic floor, in order to make all of the tiny movements that most people really only notice after they’ve slept funny. When people talk about the “core,” which has largely replaced “abs” in fitness jargon, they mean all of these muscles, as they work together. But it took decades of research to realize the error, and in the meantime, the decentralized approach to human anatomy became highly influential among another group that has helped to set the conventional wisdom about exercise: Americans trying to get swole. “The first people who popularized all of this exercise were bodybuilders trying to sculpt and define one muscle at a time,” McCall told me. Spot training—the idea that you can effectively remove fat and increase muscle mass in a single area of the body through targeted exercise—is a myth that has been stubbornly resistant to change among novice exercisers, and especially when it comes to abs. The spammy false promise of one weird trick to reduce belly fat lives on in the dregs of internet advertising to this day, precisely because people click on it.

As researchers studied more subjects who were upright and, importantly, alive, their understanding of human strength began to change. “If you really want to understand anatomy and how muscles function, you need to understand what they do while the human body is on two feet moving through gravity,” McCall said. When I asked if he could pinpoint the beginning of the end of the sit-up, he directed me to the work of Stuart McGill, a Canadian biomechanics researcher and arguably, he said, the person most responsible for the sit-up’s demise.

McGill, a professor emeritus at the University of Waterloo, in Ontario, and the author of the book Back Mechanic, didn’t begin his academic career with a particular interest in the sit-up; his work focused on the spine. But throughout the 1990s and 2000s, he led research that changed the way fitness experts thought about exercise. His findings showed that sit-ups and crunches weren’t just mediocre strength-building moves; they were actually hurting lots of people. “If you bend the spine forward over and over again when not under load, not much happens to the spine,” McGill told me. He gave the example of belly dancers, whose movements he has studied: They flex their spines repetitively without high incidence of injury. “The problem occurs when you flex over and over again with load from higher muscle activation or external objects held in the hands.”

If you’ve ever been told to lift with your legs, this is why. When a person’s spine curves and strains in order to move weight through space—like when a bunch of third graders flail through a set of sit-ups—the movement stresses their spinal disks. The more often you ask your spine to flex in those circumstances, the riskier it is. This is how people who spend their working lives moving inventory around a warehouse or stacking bushels of produce onto trucks end up with back pain later in life, even if they can’t point to any acute back injuries suffered along the way. McGill found that the most reliable way to avoid this kind of chronic problem is to brace your core when you pick up something heavy. That means tensing key muscles in order to protect your spine’s structural integrity, and to help shift the effort to your hips and legs. Not coincidentally, weight lifters follow this advice when they safely execute a dead lift. Perfect form is not always possible for workers dealing with irregular loads and crowded spaces, but intentional exercise is all about form. Getting it right and activating the intended muscles is the whole point.

The sit-up and crunch violate all of these principles. The exercise asks you to pick up something heavy, but because you’re lying on the ground and the heavy thing is your upper body, there’s no way for you to brace your core and shift the effort to the big, high-capacity muscles of your legs. And the exercise is, by its nature, repetitive. For generations, schoolchildren and troops were both told to do as many sit-ups or crunches as possible in order to score well on compulsory testing. Some people can do these exercises with no problem, McGill stipulated, but that capability depends largely on genetic factors such as how light- or heavy-framed a person is, not on any particular executional skill. For population-level instruction and testing, the sit-up simply does not work.

As McGill and other experts published their findings, he began to hear from people who had found injury patterns that matched his research—most notably, from trainers and physical therapists in the U.S. and Canadian military, who were questioning the sit-up’s primacy in their fitness instruction. In the past decade, every branch of the U.S. military has begun to phase out sit-ups and crunches from their required testing and training regimens, or else they have made them optional, alongside more orthopedically sound maneuvers such as the plank. Spokespeople for the Army and the Marines confirmed to me that these decisions in their branches were made in part to avoid the high rates of lower-back injury found among troops training for speed sit-up and crunch tests.

According to McCall, the fitness educator, when the military decides that a long-standard exercise is no longer up to snuff, lots of trainers take notice. Because of the scale and prestige of the military’s training programs, their institutional practices remain highly influential on civilian exercise, which has helped to hustle the sit-up further to the margins over the past few years. Childhood fitness testing has relented, too. The Presidential Youth Fitness Program, which replaced the Presidential Fitness Test almost a decade ago, now recommends that children practice curl-ups, which are a much more subtle movement developed by McGill that asks exercisers to brace their core while lifting their head and shoulders only slightly. (If your fitness routine regularly includes planks, bird dogs, or dead bugs, that’s also McGill’s doing—he didn’t develop those exercises, but he did usher them into mainstream use as sit-up alternatives.)

If you hadn’t yet noticed crunches disappearing around you—or if you have a trainer who still puts you through your sit-up paces—McCall said he wouldn’t exactly be shocked. Like many other American industries, the fitness business is consolidating, but it still contains tons of independent instructors and small businesses. Sit-ups and crunches have been discouraged by educators within the industry for years, but there are no licensing or continuing-education requirements for teaching exercise, and if trainers don’t seek out new information and techniques, it can take a while for good information and new ideas to get through to them. Even up-to-date instructors may have plenty of clients who just won’t let go of exercise as they’ve always understood it. “A good trainer will educate the client,” McCall told me. “But the sad fact is, with some clients, if you didn’t have them do two or three sets of crunches, they would feel like they’re not getting a good workout.”

Amanda Mull is a former staff writer at The Atlantic.

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago


THIS IS A "MEMBERS ONLY" POST
The Author of this post have chosen to restrict the content of this Post to members only.


satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250130-colossal-squid-the-eerie-ambassador-from-the-abyss?utm_medium=email&utm_source=pocket_hits&utm_campaign=POCKET_HITS-EN-DAILY-SPONSORED&NAUTILUS-2025_02_03=&sponsored=0&position=3&category=fascinating_stories&scheduled_corpus_item_id=20859668-e44c-4a08-9d52-c6770afee45e&url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250130-colossal-squid-the-eerie-ambassador-from-the-abyss

Colossal squid: The eerie ambassador from the abyss

The world's largest invertebrate remained hidden from humanity until a tantalising glimpse 100 years ago. It would take decades, however, before we finally came face to face with the colossal squid.

Under sombre, mausoleum lighting at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa rests a monster. Its enormous body lies in a huge glass coffin, thick tentacles trailing beneath a strange, mottled body that once contained two huge staring eyes.

Amongst displays of animals that inhabit the seas around New Zealand, it resembles a creature from another world – reminiscent of the first awestruck description of a Martian by the nameless narrator in H G Wells' The War of the Worlds. The bunches of tentacles beneath a bearlike bulk and a nightmarish beak of a mouth.

But this is no interplanetary visitor, rather something from the inky blackness of our own inner space: a colossal squid. It is the biggest invertebrate on Earth and the rare specimen on display at Te Papa, the shortened Māori name by which the museum is better known, is the first of these mysterious creatures to have been recovered alive – just briefly – in human history.

For an animal of such enormous size, the colossal squid has an extraordinary ability to keep itself hidden from human eyes. Its discovery was a gradual process, with hints of its existence stretched out over decades. Then – almost exactly 100 years ago – we got our first glimpse of these almost mythical creatures.

Until April 2025, no colossal squid had ever been positively identified as being observed in its natural habitat, though there have been some unconfirmed sightings. In June 2024, scientists from an Antarctic expedition said they may have filmed one on a camera attached to a polar tourism vessel in 2023, but scientisist were still analysing the footage when a confirmed sighting was announced.

Because the animal lives so deep in an ocean only recently visited by modern humanity, the first clues to its existence were the occasional remains found in the bellies of whales that hunt them. Semi-digested fragments hinted at some huge, strange squid whose arms ended in clubs with sharp, gripping hooks and evoked scenes of titanic battles for survival in the ocean depths as they tussled with whales.

The colossal squid's elusiveness underlines just how little we know about the deep oceans. And there could be other large sea creatures waiting to be discovered in some of the least explored depths.

There are thought to be up to two million species living in the oceans, with some estimates putting the figure higher. So far, we know about fewer than 250,000, according to the World Register of Marine Species.

Then, in 1981, a Soviet trawler called Eureka caught an enormous squid in its net while fishing in the Ross Sea off Antarctica. The discovery went largely unnoticed until the end of the Cold War a decade later. In the year 2000, Soviet scientist Alexander Remeslo wrote about the incident on The Octopus News Magazine Online forum, giving first-hand testimony on how the animal was captured.

"It was early morning the 3rd of February, 1981, when I was working in Lazarev Sea near Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica," he wrote. "A fellow scientist rushed into my cabin and pushed me in the ribs, shouting: 'Wake up, we caught a giant squid!' With my cameras slung around my neck I ran on deck. There lay a huge reddish-brown squid. None of the crew members, several of them sea dogs who had been wandering all over the seven seas, had previously seen something like this."

Remeslo's account paints an evocative picture: fine snow was falling on the deck of the ship, and the light was so poor that he struggled to take a properly exposed image of the squid, which had been removed from the net and lay lifeless in front of him.

"Burning with impatience to see the results of my photography, I decided to develop the films immediately on board of the vessel, rather than keeping them for developing in a professional laboratory at home," writes Remeslo, now a scientist at the Atlantic Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography in Kaliningrad, Russia, in his account. "The quality of the photos taken that day leaves much to be desired. But the most important thing has been done anyway – to document what was most probably the world's first big specimen of the colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni), which was raised from the depths onto the deck of a vessel and not removed from a sperm whale's stomach!"

Burning with impatience to see the results of my photography, I decided to develop the films immediately on board of the vessel – Alexander Remeslo

A black-and-white image taken by Remeslo and shared alongside his story shows a pair of the Soviet ship's crew crouching next to the dead squid. The creature's two long arms can be seen in the foreground, clenched like fists. According to Remeslo, the squid measured 5.1m (16.7ft), with the mantle alone measuring more than 2m (6.6ft). The squid was described as being a juvenile female, and not yet fully grown.

It would be more than 20 years before another immature colossal squid would be found. This time, in 2003 it attracted worldwide attention. "Super squid surfaces in the Antarctic", wrote BBC News at the time. The squid was found floating dead on the surface in the Ross Sea off Antarctica and was hauled aboard a fishing vessel.

The animal's remains were transported to Wellington, New Zealand's capital, where two scientists – Steve O'Shea and Kat Bolstad of the Auckland University of Technology – reassembled the creature and examined it. It helped turn O'Shea into an internationally recognised authority on giant squids.

Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0 The colossal squid's tentacles features large claws that can rotate 360 degrees (Credit: Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0)Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0

The colossal squid's tentacles features large claws that can rotate 360 degrees (Credit: Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0)

"We're sitting there at Te Papa and I've got this bloody enormous thing sitting on a slab," says O'Shea, who now lives in Paris. "It's completely defrosted. I called up a couple of contacts, and I said, 'Look, I've got this colossal squid sitting on a slab here at the department. You want to come and have a look at it?’."

O'Shea was so excited that he hadn't noticed the date: 1 April 2003. Everyone mistook it for an elaborate practical joke. "Nobody took me seriously," he says. "And it wasn't until we sent them a photograph of what we were dealing with on the slab did the press converge on us… my phone didn't stop ringing for a month."

Even for someone like O'Shea, familiar with large cephalopods, the colossal squid was still a dramatic sight. "I'd never seen anything like it before," he says. "I had worked a lot with a fellow called Malcolm Clarke on a number of my documentaries in the past, and he had spent a lifetime studying the stomach contents of sperm whales – and had reported many times their beaks in the stomachs of sperm whales. I was aware of the colossal squid's existence. I couldn't have imagined it looked anything like what we had in front of us."

The giant squid, to an extent, I was bored with, because it was just a large, very dull squid – Steve O'Shea

O'Shea had previously been studying another large squid species – the giant squid, Architeuthis dux, which can reach up to 13m (43ft). What he was faced with in 2003 was a different beast entirely.

"The giant squid, to an extent, I was bored with, because it was just a large, very dull squid," he says. "It's got no real charismatic feature other than its size. And here I am dealing with something that's got these swivelling hooks on the arms and a beak… considerably larger and considerably more robust."

Colossal squid are thought to grow to more than half-a-tonne (500kg) in weight. While the giant squid's trailing tentacles are far longer than the colossal squid's, the colossal's mantle is both larger and heavier.

Finally filmed

A colossal squid was finally filmed in its natural environment for the first time in March 2025, 100 years since the species was first identified. Scientists captured footage of a baby colossal squid during a 35-day voyage to study species near the South Sandwich Islands in the south Atlantic Ocean.

But the colossal squid is far more than a squid transformed to larger-than-usual size. Its eyes – which can measure 11in (27.5cm) across – are the largest eyes to be found in any animal yet discovered. The beak, made from a protein similar to that found in human hair and fingernails, is a sharp, clawed mouth that cuts off slices of prey. Another organ called the radula, studded with sharp teeth, shreds the chunks into smaller pieces.

On its arms, the squid has prominent hooks. Other squid, including the giant, have teeth within the suction cups. The colossal squid's are far more prominent – curved hooks the squid uses to latch onto its prey. Incredibly, the hooks found on its tentacle suction cups can rotate 360 degrees. Scientists still don't know if the squid can swivel these hooks at will, or whether they move of their own volition when the hook latches onto prey.

Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0 The colossal squid's mantle is a very different shape to the more streamlined giant squid (Credit: Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0)Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0

The colossal squid's mantle is a very different shape to the more streamlined giant squid (Credit: Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0)

O'Shea used the discovery of the squid and the ensuing media coverage as a platform to attack New Zealand's fishing industry and what he called some of its destructive practices in the Southern Ocean. He says this led to some resistance to his involvement when an even bigger squid (the one on display in Te Papa) was recovered a few years later. Amid the furore, however, O'Shea managed to finally give Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni a common name:colossal squid.

Two years after O'Shea stretched a colossal squid on his slab, fisherman nearly landed a live specimen. In 2005, a ship hunting Patagonian toothfish near South Georgia in the South Atlantic caught a colossal squid on one of their lines. Five of the fishermen toiled unsuccessfully to bring the squid aboard. A recording of it thrashing on the surface is believed to be the first footage of a living colossal squid ever captured.

In February 2007, a New Zealand fishing vessel called the San Aspiring, also hunting for Patagonian toothfish in the Ross Sea near Antarctica, pulled up its lines. Tangled amongst them was a colossal squid, fully grown and still alive.

The squid's decision to try and grab a quick meal proved its undoing. "It decided to scavenge a toothfish off the long line and got itself wrapped up in the backbone and trace [part of the fishing line] and was pulled to the surface," says Andrew Stewart, Te Papa's curator of fishes and one of the world's most respected fish scientists. The animal was estimated to weigh up to 450kg (990lb) and measured some 10m (30ft) in length. Some of the boat's fishing equipment had gouged deep cuts into its body, and the squid was badly injured and likely to die if returned to the ocean.

Vessels like the San Aspiring carry New Zealand fisheries scientists on their expeditions, partly in case they come across new or rare species. "They looked at this thing right at the surface, right up against the edge of the boat, and they realised that because the damage it had incurred from the backbone on the trace that, no, this wasn't going to be able to make it away under its own steam," says Stewart. "It was brought on board with great difficulty, because you're dealing with this very floppy specimen. How do you get it up out of the side of a ship and onto the deck, and then, what do you do with it then?"

A colossal squid of this size, relatively intact and still alive when it reached the surface, certainly met the scientist's benchmark for something worth preserving. But then they had the challenge of how to keep it cold and intact while they finished their fishing mission.

They just put this half-tonne thing in this cubic-metre bin, and froze it as a giant, colossal squid popsicle – Andrew Stewart

"They managed to get it below deck, and they froze it in what's called a pelican bin," says Stewart, who took the initial call from the fisheries observer programme to say a colossal squid had been caught. "These are one-cubic-metre bins (35 cubic ft) that contain fuel oil and things like that. And when they get to the Southern Ocean boundary, these are brought below decks. They're emptied and cleaned, the top is cut off. They're used for putting in offal and scientific specimens. So they just put this half-tonne thing in this cubic-metre bin, and froze it as a giant, colossal squid popsicle."

When the San Aspiring eventually made its way back to Wellington, that made it relatively easy to offload, says Stewart. "All you have to do is run a forklift for a pallet jack and move it," he says. On arrival it was transported straight to Te Papa's walk-in freezing facility.

"We were scratching our heads, going, 'How the hell are we going to handle this thing?'," says Stewart.

Even thawing a frozen specimen this large was an issue, let along trying to preserve it. "The way these things are constructed, and the chemistry of them, it could well rot on the outside with the inside still frozen solid," Stewart explains. "So a giant wooden tank was built and lined with three layers of rubber cement, and then three layers of heavy-duty polythene plastic.

"Stephen [O'Shea'] and co came up with the idea [that] if we make a very chilled brine solution, that means it will slow down the rate of thawing." This gave the scientists much more control over the thawing process.

Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0 When the squid arrived in Wellington, scientists had to work out how to thaw it (Credit: Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0)Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0

When the squid arrived in Wellington, scientists had to work out how to thaw it (Credit: Te Papa/ CC BY 4.0)

"If you freeze something, ice expands and breaks down the connective tissue and will certainly make something more gelatinous," O'Shea adds. "When we defrosted that thing, of course, the ice crystals expand, and everything blows up. Then when the ice melts, everything shrinks. As it lay on the slab, defrosting, we could see it losing bulk."

In order to preserve the body, its tissue had to be injected with a formalin solution, but getting the right mix was crucial, says O'Shea. "That was a 4% formalin solution from memory. Once I fixed it from the inside out, we then immersed it into a vat of formaldehyde/seawater solution. And then we had to monitor that thing over the course of the next 48 to 72, hours, monitoring the pH, because the minute the pH goes anything above seven, the calcareous hooks that align in the arms and the suckers start to dissolve."

When the pH of the solution got too acidic, the tank was emptied and then another formalin solution was added. "It preserved the colour," says O'Shea. "It was a beautiful looking specimen."

What do we preserve it in, display it in, and how do we get it from here down the road? – Andrew Stewart

Te Papa knew the squid could become a star attraction. But the giant defrosted body created an entirely new problem, says Stewart. "One, how do we display it? And two, how do we transport this big floppy thing?"

The colossal squid is adapted to living in the crushing pressure of the deep ocean, meaning its soft body is supported by the surrounding water. In the open air, it collapses.

"If you're not careful, the whole thing could detach," says Stewart.

Te Papa's solution was to contact a glass fabricating company in the nearby city of Palmerston North, which produced a special curved case for the squid using a technique that didn't produce bubbles during its construction.

The case was assembled right next to where the thawed squid was being kept in central Wellington, some 900m (984yds) from the museum itself. The museum's experts then had to work out how it could be both preserved and transported. "What do we preserve it in, display it in, and how do we get it from here down the road?" Stewart says. "We can't display it in alcohol or formalin because of the issues around health and safety and fire risk management and all that kind of stuff." A suggestion by another member of the team was to submerge the squid in polypropylene glycol. While Stewart says this is non-toxic, "they have to add a rather toxic biocide to it in order to stop any bacterial action, fungal action".

While the team were working out how to move their colossal cadaver, something elemental came to their rescue: gravity. Wellington is a hilly city, and the squid was at the top of an incline. They came up with a plan: the squid would be transported to the museum late at night on the back of a flatbed truck in the container, but with all the liquid removed in order to save weight. "It just sort of glided down late at night when there's no traffic, and the traffic lights could be set [to let it through.]" The squid was then safely unloaded and took up residence in Te Papa, an ambassador from an abyssal zone few humans will ever visit.

Emmanuel Lafont/ BBC The colossal squid is a completely different species to the giant squid, and thought to be much heavier when fully grown (Credit: Emmanuel Lafont/ BBC)Emmanuel Lafont/ BBC

The colossal squid is a completely different species to the giant squid, and thought to be much heavier when fully grown (Credit: Emmanuel Lafont/ BBC)

"Some people have said, 'Oh, it looks bit rough and falling to bits, but it's no worse than once it came out of formalin," says Stewart. "This poor thing had been sort of fairly badly damaged already by the time they got it up to the side of the boat.

"There will be gradual and slow decay of it, you can't stop that. Light will affect it, temperature fluctuations… it will degrade. It does look a bit like Frankenstein's monster, with stitching holding things together," says Stewart. "Peter Jackson [the film director] has taken a few notes."

--

Specimens like the one at Te Papa offer vital clues about the biology and behaviour of this mysterious deep sea mollusc. The colossal squids that have been brought up to the surface to date have nearly always come from deep water. They have either been ensnared in cables or attacked fish caught on fishing lines, attracted by the prospect of an easy meal. Their interactions with humanity have been inadvertent, often violent and dramatically short.

Scientists have been able to slowly piece together fragments of the colossal squid's life cycle and habits. Much, however, remains mysterious. It is like trying to create a coherent story of a person's life through a handful of holiday snapshots – the majority lies beyond the frames.

Colossal squid are highly evolved for a cold and dark environment, and live near the top of the food chain in the bitterly cold waters they call home. They prey on large sub-Antarctic fish such as Patagonian toothfish (also known as Chilean sea bass) – dozens of these fish caught by trawlers between 2011 and 2014 showed wounds characteristic of the squid's hook-covered tentacles, according to Vladimir Laptikhovskiy of the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science in the UK. "Taking into account the size of adult squid, the toothfish probably is its most common prey species, because no other deep-sea fish of similar size are available around the Antarctic," he told New Scientist in 2015. There are some reports, however, of young colossal squid – which live closer to the surface – being found in the diets of penguins and other seabirds.

A study in 2010 from the University of South Florida showed that a colossal squid only needs to eat 30g (1oz) of food a day

Few animals are thought to prey upon colossal squid apart from sperm whales and southern sleeper sharks, slow moving but powerful deepwater sharks that can grow up to 4.2m (14ft) long. The colossal squid's size is a form of protective adaptation – the bigger you grow, the less likely you are to be eaten by something else.

And this growth happens quickly. Much like giant squid, colossal squid are not thought to live much longer than five years, although their exact lifespan – like so much about these creatures – is largely a mystery. They appear to live longer than smaller species of squid – most of which live little more than a year – but remarkably short given their great size. This type of growth is known as abyssal gigantism – it's seen across many other species which inhabit cold, deep waters, including spider crabs.

This gigantism, strangely, doesn't require enormous amounts of energy. A study in 2010 from the University of South Florida estimated that a colossal squid could survive for around 160 days on a single 5kg (11lb) toothfish – the equivalent of only 30g (1oz) of food a day, or just 45 calories. The temperature in the deep Southern Ocean where they are found typically hovers around 1.5C (34.7F), and studies suggest the larger animals become in these conditions, the more efficient their metabolism becomes. Research on the metabolic rate of colossal squid suggests they have a slow pace of life, spending much of their time passively floating, waiting to ambush their prey.

The enormous eyes of the colossal squid are thought to have evolved to detect large predators such as sperm whales rather than spot prey at long distances.

Small juveniles are thought to live closer to the surface – above 500m (1,640ft), but as they grow they descend to depths of up to 2,000m (6,560ft).

Isabel Joy Te Aho-White/ Te Papa The book Whiti tells the story of a colossal squid that lives in the deep Southern Ocean (Credit: Isabel Joy Te Aho-White/ Te Papa)Isabel Joy Te Aho-White/ Te Papa

The book Whiti tells the story of a colossal squid that lives in the deep Southern Ocean (Credit: Isabel Joy Te Aho-White/ Te Papa)

Much of the squid's life cycle remains hidden from view. One of Te Papa's staff has attempted to fill in the gaps in the squid's life, and written a book about it. Whiti: Colossal Squid From the Deep, a children's book written by Victoria Cleal and released in 2020, tells the story of a colossal squid's life from hatching out of a minuscule egg to becoming the world's largest invertebrate (it was illustrated by Isobel Joy Te Aho-White)

Cleal said she was chosen to write the book because of her experience writing labels for exhibits aimed at children, making them as friendly and informal as possible. "They knew there's basically an insatiable desire amongst children for information about the colossal squid, whether it's in a book or an exhibition label or in a video," she says. "It constantly fascinates visitors. Everyone who comes to the museum wants to see the colossal squid.

"There are now kids who saw it at the beginning who come back as young adults… and I just love the thought that one day they might bring their children back to see it."

Despite the painstaking effort that went into displaying the squid, the years have still taken their toll. "That squid is not looking at its best anymore," Cleal says. "The eyes have been removed and other body parts, there's a lot of stitches. I did want to mention that squid in the book, just to give some connection between the book and Te Papa. But that squid came to a very unhappy ending because it got itself hooked on a line and died."

Telling the story of a different squid – one still roaming the cold watery world off the coast of Antarctica – allowed Cleal to imagine a whole life cycle, even if so much of it is still unknown.

I just think that's great for kids, to be an advocate for science as a career, to think that there are things to discover – Victoria Cleal

With the help of squid experts like Kat Bolstad, Cleal set to work. Bringing a male squid into the story wasn't possible, because one has never been observed. "But there are things we can imagine, like what it would be like to be 2,000m (6,561ft) down, even though nobody's been down there, in the Ross Sea." She says it was all about keeping Whiti (a Māori word meaning to change or turnover) within the realms of possibility.

Cleal says the squid's enormous size and frightening appearance is part of its allure with a younger audience, but that ultimately this undersea "monster" is relatively harmless. Many descriptions of the colossal squid evoke legends of the mythical kraken terrorising sailors of old, but in reality the creatures live so deep and so far from shore that a human is unlikely to ever find themselves face-to-face with one in the water. But the fact we know so little about the colossal squid and the realm it inhabits only makes them more intriguing, says Cleal. "It's such a mysterious world, I think that captures everybody's imagination. We don't know what's going on down there."

Cleal said she was partly inspired to tell the story of the colossal squid to make children imagine what else might live in the cold, inky depths the squid calls home. "I just think that's great for kids, to be an advocate for science as a career, to think that that there are things to discover. It hasn't all been found yet? And why don't you try to become a marine biologist too?"

--

James Erik Hamilton was a marine biologist, a naturalist and oceanographer who spent much of his life in the Falklands and surrounding islands. He arrived in 1919 to conduct a survey of the fur seal population. He became the Falkland Islands Dependencies administrator a few years later, and spent much of the 1920s working on whaling ships or on the stations that supported them across the South Atlantic islands.

Hamilton would investigate the contents of the whales' stomach as part of his job, and in the winter of 1924/25, found something in the stomach of one sperm whale which he had never seen before: tentacles from some large, mysterious squid that ended in sharp gripping claws.

Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC The remains of the colossal squid James Erik Hamilton found sit in a jar in the Natural History Museum in London (Credit: Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC)Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC

The remains of the colossal squid James Erik Hamilton found sit in a jar in the Natural History Museum in London (Credit: Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC)

Hamilton believed they were new to science. He had them preserved and then sent them to the Zoological Department of the British Museum back in London.

A report in the Journal of Natural History soon after reported the creature's arms "furnished with a group of four to nine large hooks" and its hand consisting of "hooks alone, which are capable of rotating in any direction". Hamilton's specimens were the first remains of a colossal squid to be scientifically recorded. The species, described for the first time in 1925 by Guy Coburn Robson, would be named after him. Hamilton died in 1957, decades before a complete colossal squid would be discovered.

There, in a jar with the words 'Mesonychoteuthis Hamilton, 1925' lie the remains of the squid that had so intrigued Hamilton a century before

While talking to O'Shea, I mention the tentacles Hamilton discovered a century ago. His response is immediate: "Have you seen them yet?" It turns out those first, species-defining tentacles still sit, suspended in a jar, on the shelves of the Molluscs Department at the Natural History Museum in London. An email to O'Shea's friend, Jon Ablett, a senior curator at the molluscs department at the museum, elicits an invitation to see them a few days later.

A couple of weeks later, steers me through the museum's seemingly unending corridors. It is the proverbial needle in the haystack. "Just the molluscs department alone, we have eight million objects," Ablett says cheerily.

In these archival storage units sit dozens upon dozens of jars, each of them containing an animal – or parts of an animal – once new to science. Ablett finds the right door and opens it. There, in a jar with the words "Mesonychoteuthis Hamilton, 1925" lie the remains of the squid that had so intrigued Hamilton a century before. The first scientific evidence of the giant lurking far below the waves.

Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC The Natural History Museum's Jon Ablett with a colossal squid tentacle kept in the museum's basement (Credit: Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC)Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC

The Natural History Museum's Jon Ablett with a colossal squid tentacle kept in the museum's basement (Credit: Javier Hirschfeld/ BBC)

"Strangely, we don't really know that much about how the specimens were found and recovered," Ablett says. "The way that specimens were collected at the time, it almost wasn't thought of as important. And of course, you also don't know what's important until you realise it's important."

The whale was thought to have been taken off the Falkland Islands, and the tentacles sent off to what was then the British Museum. Robson examined them when they arrived.

"The way we preserve animals hasn't really changed over the last 200 years," Ablett says, noting that alcohol is still sometimes used. "With lots of invertebrate animals, especially deep-sea creatures, the preservation techniques can really distort the features and generally shrink them." The tentacles, now a century old, look lumpen and weirdly coloured, but the swivelling claws that so intrigued Hamilton are still there.

"They are, you know, half-chewed stomach remains… basically the ring of flesh around the mouth, most of bits of the arms, and that's pretty much it," Ablett says. "But he [Hamilton] was able to recognise that they were so distinct from any other known squid that they had to be a new species. And I guess sperm whales are really good at catching things in the deep ocean, much better than we were at the time, and probably even now."

The colossal squid's remains predate molecular classification, and further study of this by-now century-old squid may yield further clues about its life. One of the things scientists do know, Ablett says, is that the colossal squid and the giant squid are entirely different animals. "They're not very closely related," he says.

The giant squid, Ablett says, throws up some intriguing questions about why some squid grow so large, when others remain relatively small. "The thing that always fascinates me is lots of the species related to the giant squid – these are the Cranchiid squids, or glass squids – are very, very small, you know, a couple of inches long. But just this one species is so large."

One benefit of getting massive is, of course, nothing can eat you – Jon Ablett

A century on from the colossal squid's initial discovery, Ablett says, we still know so little about them. In his 20 years of studying this elusive abyssal giant, "they're just not turning up in enough numbers", he says. "They haven't been observed in the wild, in their natural state yet."

Ablett says there are hints in the biology as to how the squid may live their days in the deep, cold waters of the Southern Ocean. "You look at the colossal squid, it's very blobby. It doesn't look particularly sleek." This for him perhaps underlines its status as an ambush predator. "Is it hiding in these dark oceans, waiting for things to pass?" he asks.

Ablett says one thing scientists have found is that where you find colossal squid, you won’t find giant squid. The respective big beasts of the cephalopod world appear to have drawn some invisible line in the world's oceans, which neither crosses. And very cold oceans are something of a hotspot for very large organisms, he says. "It just seems to be a kind of trend with especially polar organisms, that they get very, very big. I mean, one benefit of getting massive is, of course, nothing can eat you."

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago
satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago

https://nautil.us/how-pebbles-form-planets-1201205/?utm_campaign=website&utm_medium=email&utm_source=nautilus-newsletter

How Pebbles Form Planets

It starts with static electricity and dust swirling around young stars

By Tom Metcalfe

The secret to the formation of planets may lie in ordinary static electricity—the same phenomenon that can make your hair stand on end or give you an electric shock after walking across a carpet.

A new study, published in Nature Astronomy, suggests that static electricity allows tiny dust particles in protoplanetary disks—the rotating platters of gas and dust that form around young stars—to clump together into “pebbles” that are large enough to play a role in the formation of planets.

The image above shows basaltic beads, each measuring 0.55 millimeters, that were used in an experiment, which took place aboard a suborbital rocket.

The findings help resolve a mystery that has shrouded something called the bouncing barrier—the size threshold that particles must reach in order to rely on gravity to join with other particles—says lead author of the study Jens Teiser, an astrophysicist at the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany.

The dust particles need static electricity to make them “sticky” enough to cluster into pebbles that can form planets.

Only when particles grow larger than this threshold size—roughly a quarter of an inch, depending on conditions—can they eventually join to form rocky “planetesimals,” from about half a mile to 100 miles across, that scientists think then collide within protoplanetary disks to create planets like Earth.

Smaller “dust particles don’t stick together,” Teiser says, unless they have an electrostatic charge.

Static electricity is produced when different objects with an imbalance of positive and negative charges make contact, which results in an electrostatic charge. In this case, the electrostatic charge is generated by collisions between tiny dust particles, which can cause them to either gain electrons or lose electrons, resulting in a negative or a positive charge, respectively. Oppositely charged particles will then attract each other—according to the law of electrostatics—and can clump together to create even larger charged particles, Teiser says.

Teiser and his colleagues suspected this was the case after conducting “tower drop” experiments with tiny basalt particles, in which they observed the behavior of these particles during nine seconds of near-weightlessness. But that wasn’t enough time to reach a conclusion, so in 2022 the researchers performed an experiment onboard a suborbital rocket that launched from Kiruna in northern Sweden, to observe how the particles behaved during six minutes of weightlessness.

During the 2022 launch, described in the latest study, the rocket reached an altitude of about 160 miles, and weightlessness kicked in as the rocket’s payload fell back to Earth. At that point, a particle reservoir aboard the vessel opened, releasing the particles. In some cases, the reservoir was shaken to give the particles electrostatic charge, but in other cases, it was not. Only those particles that had been shaken began to assemble into an aggregate. The largest cluster, shown in the image, was a little more than an inch in length. Teiser says his team of researchers sent four versions of their experiment aloft in the rocket, each with different starting conditions.

The researchers believe their findings suggest that the dust particles in protoplanetary disks need static electricity to make them “sticky” enough to cluster into pebbles that can form planets. They were also able to calculate the maximum average speeds the tiny particles can travel when they collide if they are to create clumps: about a foot and a half per second. Collisions at greater speeds tended to erode the surfaces of large clusters.

The results will be used in models that try to explain how massive planets like our own arise from mere dust.

Tom Metcalfe is a science journalist based in London, where he writes mainly about space, energy, archaeology, Earth, and the oceans. He has written for Scientific American, National Geographic, Live Science, NBC News, BBC News, and others.

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 months ago

A Book of Simple Living by RUSKIN BOND

There is an old cane chair in the living room that has supported my considerable weight for well over thirty years. My wooden bed has done service for forty. My typewriter, too, which I used till it could no longer be repaired, did service for forty years. Since then I have relied on the pen and my fingers—which have served me quite well for at least seventy-five of my eighty years.

My books are old, most of my pictures are old; my shoes are old, my only suit is very old.

Only I am young.

Growing up was always a difficult process for me, and I gave up trying many years ago. I have the temper of a child, and a tendency to be mischievous. And I still retain a childlike trust in grown-ups, which sometimes works to my detriment. But it doesn’t matter. In the long run, the exploiters and manipulators meet with their comeuppances; they are their own worst enemies.

Meanwhile, I’ll continue being an eight-year-old. Recently, I was feeling a bit low, so I played marbles with the children. They won all my marbles, but I felt better

Darkness falls, and it is time to pull my chair to the window. Much that is lovely comes at this hour.

There is the fragrance of raat ki rani, queen of the night, from a neighbour’s balcony, two feet by two. And soon there will be moonlight falling on those white flowers, and moonbeam in my room. Sometimes a field mouse drops in for a bite (he remembers my dinnertime). High in the treetops, an owl hoots softly, as if testing, trying to remember. The nightjar plays trombone, and the crickets join in to complete the orchestra. They go silent when the swamp deer calls. A leopard is out hunting.

A breeze has sprung up, it hums in the trees, and now the window is rattling. Time to shut the window. A star falls in the heavens.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".