Originally posted by: Arshics
There is no basis at all!
Kanha was always - manmohana - the one who will win everyone over with his beauty and charm
Natkhat - mischievous in an enticing loving way
And always stood against evil and with superior abilities - from pootna wadh as an infant to Kaliya nag as a little child - Kanha was always about recognizing evil even if it came in the guise of good (pootna) and conquoring it.
He was there to do the vinash of burayi, and born with the powers to do so
The whole of Gita, Ivy is full of such wisdom, not religious push posh, but true gyan and principles of leading life which till date are true and relevant, and Krishna always had that wisdom!
So pramaad and Kanha ? Only as much as for every ma, her child is always Kanha, and sd is in denial, for her he is still the nanha munna playing ghar ghar with kalika, and the daru ki botal is his doodh ki botal
Speaking for myself, since I am not religious, it's not religious sensibilities that are offended, but I am a great admirer of Krishna so I am very offended.
But to compare him to Kanha beyond that is making my blood boil!
As for TRP junta, if you want to show someone as good, compare them to some Bhagwan, that's all!