What's so bad about a lip-lock onscreen? - Page 9

Created

Last reply

Replies

109

Views

10.6k

Users

26

Likes

173

Frequent Posters

Chippeshwini thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#81
double post.. sorta 😆
Edited by liverach - 13 years ago
ShellJA thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#82

Originally posted by: ..Geeta..

It looks like we've placed option 'e' in the same league as option 'a to d', fair enough so here it goes -

a) husbands being cruel, indifferent, rude, chauvinistic, physically abusive to their wives, - Wrong!
b) saas being all the above to her bahu. - Wrong!
c) stupid kitchen politics - Wrong!
d) other nonsensical kalakaries - Wrong!
e) an sweet innocent kiss which is the most natural and beautiful thing in a relationship. - Wrong?? Well I guess it's placed in the same league so yes!

Basically if we can watch first four wrong deeds then we should not cringe away from watching option 'e' which is equally wrong. I rest my case 😆



Interesting that you didn't respond to this part of my quote:

For me this is a no brainer, I will always pick the e) the innocent kiss. Now everyone has a choice because our TV offers us all sorts of options. Zee was heavily advertizing this kiss so if people were embarrassed or didn't want to watch with their families then they didn't have to watch it.
HeartEmWatson thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#83

Originally posted by: Shell16



Interesting that you didn't respond to this part of my quote:

For me this is a no brainer, I will always pick the e) the innocent kiss. Now everyone has a choice because our TV offers us all sorts of options. Zee was heavily advertizing this kiss so if people were embarrassed or didn't want to watch with their families then they didn't have to watch it.


What exactly is there to respond in this? You think they shouldn't have watched it and I think they shouldn't have shown it. As simple as that. Option 'a to d' is more then enough wrong that we see, why add more? 😆
Edited by ..Geeta.. - 13 years ago
HeartEmWatson thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#84

Originally posted by: liverach

😆

Payal ji, aap ke paas patience nahin hain toh its not my problem! I'm gonna compile my set of favorite po*n sites to send you, wait a little bit na😕

@Geeta...

I got everything you said except for the last bit =/


Never mind.. generalization has a different meaning for you.
Chippeshwini thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#85
^ no, why sweep it under the rug?

you're trying to say that I'm changing the definition of generalization to make it on my own terms?

I successfully proved that subjective words are INDEED subjective, as they can mean different things for different people.
payalgarg thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#86

Originally posted by: ..Geeta..


What exactly is there to respond in this? You think they shouldn't have watched it and I think they shouldn't have shown it. As simple as that. Option 'a to d' is more then enough wrong that we see, why add more? 😆


geeta,shell meant people should have been dreamt the previous night that a kiss promo will come on TV the next day,keep the children away from TV😆

I think these people should actually check the legal parameters of Information and broadcasting ministry and that Bade Acche Lagte hain was about to go off air because of the kiss scene though it is late night time slot.But how many times will producers escape the doses from the ministry?

Talking to some people about moral standards is like hitting ur head hard against the wall ,better talk to them in their language

ITS AGAINST THE LAW TO LIPLOCK(INNOCENT KISS OR PECKING WHATEVER😆)BEFORE 11PM ON T.V.ITS ILLEGAL AND IT IS ILLEGAL
Edited by payalgarg - 13 years ago
HeartEmWatson thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#87

Originally posted by: liverach

^ no, why sweep it under the rug?


you're trying to say that I'm changing the definition of generalization to make it on my own terms?

I successfully proved that subjective words are INDEED subjective, as they can mean different things for different people.


Precisely!

Subjective word is indeed subjective & like I said I'd like to go by the definition which stands true for me and max people I know.
Chippeshwini thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#88
yeah, go right ahead

that doesn't mean that your and the "max"'s definition gets to shove its weight around.

I can't believe it 😆 here, I'm being called below-the-belt shit, and you don't seem to care much about THAT generalization do you?
HeartEmWatson thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#89

Originally posted by: payalgarg

geeta,shell meant people should have been dreamt the previous night that a kiss promo will come on TV the next day,keep the children away from TV😆

I think these people should actually check the legal parameters of Information and broadcasting ministry and that Bade Acche Lagte hain was about to go off air because of the kiss scene though it is late night time slot.But how many times will producers escape the doses from the ministry?

Talking to some people about moral standards is like hitting ur head hard against the wall ,better talk to them in their language

ITS AGAINST THE LAW TO LIPLOCK(INNOCENT KISS OR PECKING WHATEVER😆)BEFORE 11PM ON T.V.ITS ILLEGAL AND IT IS ILLEGAL


You know what's more funny? Option 'a to d' is all gonna happen in the same exact show that they 'chose' to watch cuz of 'innocent kiss' 😆
Edited by ..Geeta.. - 13 years ago
HeartEmWatson thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#90

Originally posted by: liverach

yeah, go right ahead


that doesn't mean that your and the "max"'s definition gets to shove its weight around.

I can't believe it 😆 here, I'm being called below-the-belt shit, and you don't seem to care much about THAT generalization do you?

Maybe you don't go by the weight of my & my "max's" definition but it's heavy enough for topics like this to come into existence 😆

Did I 'generalize' you in that manner?
Edited by ..Geeta.. - 13 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".