WHO STOPPED WATCHING BIDAAI? - Page 6

Originally posted by: rabees011

I agree there is no rona-dhona, but this track should have some logic at least. How can Tamanna not know who her real father is? If khushi knows about sadhna then why not tamanna? In real life, such a truth (ranvir's death) doesn't even take days to come out. Usually the whole area finds out. Besides, the Rajvansh are very famous people. Therefore, Ranvir's death news should have been on the media and by now the whole Agra would have found out about his death. The question is, if the whole Agra can find out what happened to Ranvir, then why can't Tamanna who is Ranvir's own daughter---one of the closest individuals in Ranvir's life? Don't people in their area talk about it?

Apart from that, if a woman becomes widow and remarries, does she stay in her ex-husband's house with her new husband? In real life, no sane woman would want to do that. Besides, the people in her ex-sasuraal wouldn't tolerate that and even her parents and relatives wouldn't allow her to stay in her ex-sasuraal with her new husband.

Lastly, I think this track could have been refreshing without Ragini remarriage. They could have shown Anmol as a famil friend or Alekh's doctor who cures Alekh, spreads happiness in Rajvansh family and blah blah blah and then Alekh becomes normal and becomes a father-like figure to both Khushi and Tamanna.

What we think is that, the Bidaaii makers are doing injustice to Alekh's character by making him mental, and they are also doing injustice to Ragini, Vasu, and Tamanna, because Raginiand vasu who are very close to Ranveer can't even shed a drop of tear in front of everyone by remembering him. Secondly, Tamanna doesn't know who her real father is and she is calling someone else papa. I agree Anmol is nurturing her, but she has the right to know about Ranvir and consider him to be her real father. I am not saying that she should abandon Anmol and sccept Ranvir whole-heartedly. She should be grateful to Anmol and love him for being there for her, but not call him papa. She can definitely call him something like, "chote papa" or whatever like Alekh...who used to address his chaachi as "choti maa" and vasu as maa.

Apart from that, by showing a remarriage track, they are trying to portray that relationships are nothing when it comes to circumstances. If Ragini couldn't forget Ranveer at any cost and she knew that no one will be happy with this marriage, then why did she have to marry Anmol? They are trying to show marriage as a compromise, but why? Are they tryng to say that, relationships are like costume change parties..jab chaahe badal daalo..just like a snake sheds its external skeleton? Does this mean, if circumstances change once again, Ragini will have to marry another person and leave behind Anmol for her family's sake, just like she married Anmol after Ranveer's death?

Is marriage really the solution to everything? Is it necessary that a man has to marry a woman to help her out, because she is in distress? Aren't there many other ways through which help can be provided? Some might argue that this is a way to show that life goes on without your loved ones. However, if RS shows that Ragini is leading a life without Ranveer and she is living for Khushi and Tamanna to nurture them, isn't that also a way to show that life goes on even without your loved ones? Can't they once show, that marriage is not the nly thing that gives us a purpose to live? Can't they show that there can be other puposes too, such as nurturing kids, looking after parents and siblings etc..? Can't a woman be strong, sensible and responsible enough to nurture her kids without the presence of a man? Some might say it is extremely difficult. Well, it is difficult, but it isn't impossible either. When there's a will, there is a way. This show was different from Kekta shows, because it had no remarriage and replacement tracks. But now, it seems that there's no difference between kekta and Rajan Shahi's shows.

That's why we are angry on RS for showing us this remarriage track. He could have easily made us all love his character by introducing him as a family friend or Alekh's doctor or anybody else without any ties with Ragini.

Originally posted by: temorocks

Friends, why to bother ur self on explaining, we all know that this show is crap and we know many stopped watching this crap.......

Originally posted by: rabees011

I agree there is no rona-dhona, but this track should have some logic at least. How can Tamanna not know who her real father is? If khushi knows about sadhna then why not tamanna? In real life, such a truth (ranvir's death) doesn't even take days to come out. Usually the whole area finds out. Besides, the Rajvansh are very famous people. Therefore, Ranvir's death news should have been on the media and by now the whole Agra would have found out about his death. The question is, if the whole Agra can find out what happened to Ranvir, then why can't Tamanna who is Ranvir's own daughter---one of the closest individuals in Ranvir's life? Don't people in their area talk about it?

Apart from that, if a woman becomes widow and remarries, does she stay in her ex-husband's house with her new husband? In real life, no sane woman would want to do that. Besides, the people in her ex-sasuraal wouldn't tolerate that and even her parents and relatives wouldn't allow her to stay in her ex-sasuraal with her new husband.

Lastly, I think this track could have been refreshing without Ragini remarriage. They could have shown Anmol as a famil friend or Alekh's doctor who cures Alekh, spreads happiness in Rajvansh family and blah blah blah and then Alekh becomes normal and becomes a father-like figure to both Khushi and Tamanna.

What we think is that, the Bidaaii makers are doing injustice to Alekh's character by making him mental, and they are also doing injustice to Ragini, Vasu, and Tamanna, because Ragini and vasu who are very close to Ranveer can't even shed a drop of tear in front of everyone by remembering him. Secondly, Tamanna doesn't know who her real father is and she is calling someone else papa. I agree Anmol is nurturing her, but she has the right to know about Ranvir and consider him to be her real father. I am not saying that she should abandon Anmol and accept Ranvir whole-heartedly. She should be grateful to Anmol and love him for being there for her, but not call him papa. She can definitely call him something like, "chote papa" or whatever like Alekh...who used to address his chaachi as "choti maa" and vasu as maa.

Apart from that, by showing a remarriage track, they are trying to portray that relationships are nothing when it comes to circumstances. If Ragini couldn't forget Ranveer at any cost and she knew that no one will be happy with this marriage, then why did she have to marry Anmol? They are trying to show marriage as a compromise, but why? Are they tryng to say that, relationships are like costume change parties..jab chaahe badal daalo..just like a snake sheds its external skeleton? Does this mean, if circumstances change once again, Ragini will have to marry another person and leave behind Anmol for her family's sake, just like she married Anmol after Ranveer's death?

Is marriage really the solution to everything? Is it necessary that a man has to marry a woman to help her out, because she is in distress? Aren't there many other ways through which help can be provided? Some might argue that this is a way to show that life goes on without your loved ones. However, if RS shows that Ragini is leading a life without Ranveer and she is living for Khushi and Tamanna to nurture them, isn't that also a way to show that life goes on even without your loved ones? Can't they once show, that marriage is not the nly thing that gives us a purpose to live? Can't they show that there can be other puposes too, such as nurturing kids, looking after parents and siblings etc..? Can't a woman be strong, sensible and responsible enough to nurture her kids without the presence of a man? Some might say it is extremely difficult. Well, it is difficult, but it isn't impossible either. When there's a will, there is a way. This show was different from Kekta shows, because it had no remarriage and replacement tracks. But now, it seems that there's no difference between kekta and Rajan Shahi's shows.

That's why we are angry on RS for showing us this remarriage track. He could have easily made us all love his character by introducing him as a family friend or Alekh's doctor or anybody else without any ties with Ragini.

agree wid u rabees.............👏...very well said...esp

Originally posted by: SohaniD

exactly so stop explaining an let us watch

Originally posted by: SohaniD

exactly so stop explaining an let us watch

Originally posted by: temorocks

Did anybody forced u to stop watching it? 😕

We don't want to watch it, so simple is that, u feel is interessting, fine then watch it, but we don't think so.........

Originally posted by: rabees011

I don't think we are preventing you guys from watching this show. We are just expresng our views on why we think this show to be illogical at the moment and we do have the right to do that. That's the reason why this forum has been created, so that we can give our views in a constructive manner.