Just to clear a confusion - Page 5

Originally posted by: Preity_Khan

thanx 4 the article!!

but may i ask wot was the need 4 this?
wot u trying 2 prove?

Originally posted by: Omshanti1111

Anyways, I didn't open this thread to fight with anyone, rather kept my cool when people tried to attack me... I reported against only one person in this thread, as I felt it was necessary...

Thanks for all your inputs....

Originally posted by: Crimson_Sky

Bani ... look at the Bidaai Hall Of Fame.... You are the most popular member today 👏

Originally posted by: Omshanti1111

you just edited your reply..the second sentence was not there before right?///////// which part did you like most in isabel's reply...sorry you are not bound to reply me...if you want, you can..solely your desire "I edited this post a bit as I forgot to write a not here"

Originally posted by: Crimson_Sky

Haan yaar ... par phir bhi! ... Yeh bhi zaroori hai. Sabko knowledge ki avashakta hai 😊.

Dekho ... why we learn so much about business in such big universities?...While the lions share of businessmen around the world are hardly High School graduates???....

We all need knowledge... articles are very important for that. As so many people are here to discuss... therefore its a very relevant article here. Because this is Solid DATA.

There is no intention for any harm. But knowledge must come forward, isnt it?....Otherwise we are pushed back to dark ages where if people said that the world was Round .... they were killed, and their families murdered.

Still history is proud of those who spoke out the truth. Investigated the truth ... and stood firm with it. If truth hurts someone, its not the fault of the truth ... its the lack of capability to accept the truth!...We must develop positive capabilities.

Originally posted by: luv_ragvir

yes i edited my post.

i replied long back but u wereen't answering so i asked u about ur secong question.

as far as isabel's post are concerned i agree with everything.whats the need to post such an old article.as it is we have fights here in the forum everyday.

Beauty is more than skin deep...

Bidaai is a story of two sisters, Sadhna (beautiful) and Ragini (unattractive). Sadhna is the adopted child in the family.

Life is pleasant for Sadhna as she is beautiful but society is a bit rude and harsh on Ragini, who faces a lot more challenges because she is not good-looking.
Both the sisters love each other immensely and are good natured but society's approach towards them makes Sadhna's life difficult as her mother starts differentiating between them. Sadhna is treated like a step-daughter in the house and feels punished for her good looks but Ragini loves her unconditionally.

All-in-all, the story is about these two sisters whose \'looks\' determine their happiness. This unique story embarks the journey of two sisters and makes one question the belief - "Are beautiful people happier than ugly Bettys?"

The bolded parts hopefully clears all the confusions that BOTH ragini & sadhna are THE LEADS of bidaai. If ragini wasnt the one of the main character, Rajan sir would've never even mentioned her in his blog, but he gives both the characters (sadhna & ragini) equal importance & have had clarified several times that BOTH are the leads of the show.

I am going to close this topic because it is going to create fights whatsoever because intentionally or unintentionally it is instigating & shows comparisons, or will start comparisons all over again as to who is the lead of bidaai.

Topic Closed.