|SADDA HAQ SEASON1|Sanyukta's character&an analysis of human behav

Mystic_Aura thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#1
Hola everyone
No, this is not the episode review post whic i generally make.
This is just a small analysis of Sadda Haq Season 1, to be specific of sanyukta's character, and also a general analysis of human behaviour.
Lets jzz quickly traipse through season 1.
Sanyukta Agarwal...the daughter of the rich mr kishore agarwal, a backward thinking, patriarchial man, who obviously demeans the status of women, condemning them to a more secondary status in his society. So, his daughter sanyukta is not allowed to study something she loves - Mechanical Engineering - snce her father thinks it is a "ladkon waala kaam" and that girls should not try to compete with men. Sanyukta rebels agains her father, an, as a result, ends up getting disowned by her own family. Her father DOES accept her later, but that is another story all together.
Lets just take into consideration, the human behaviour for a minute.
Have u guyz ever heard of the 'missing tile syndrome'??
I think not...
Well, the missing tile syndrome, is just a name given to a very normal aspect of human behaviour. Human beings tend to be a discontented lot, hence, they always tend to focus on, in simple terms, what they DONT have, rather than on what they do. So it is quite possible that a lady who thinks herself to be fat, walks into a room full of people and only notices what lovely figures the other women have. Or a man who doesnt have much hair could easily walk into a party and only notice the heads full of hair. It is a normal tendency of humans to do that. But sometimes, the missind tile syndroe applies not only to materialistic things like a figure and hair, but to mental conditions too.
So far, according to what we have seen in Sadda Haq season 1 and 2, sanyukta never had her father's support, in pursuing the career of her choice. She was a feminist by heart, Not an FCP, a female chauvnist pig (sorry, i kinda came up with that one😆) but yes, she does remain sensitive on the topic of gender bias.
Now for a moment, let us consider some totally different circumstances.
Sanyukta's surroundings remain the same, except for the mindsets of her parents. Mr agarwal is a modern, free thinking man, and so is her mom. They both believe that girls SHOULD, most certainly, go out into the world and make a name for themselves. They back sanyukta up every which way possible. They have full confidence in her, and so do expectations.
Now what happens to sanyukta??
Ofcourse, there is a chance that she thrives under this support of her parents, and excels in whatever she does. But is that all??
There is another possibility, that so much of support and expectation actually has the adverse effect on her - it crumbles her. Slowly, she begins thinking that there are so many expectations... why does she HAVE to do all that?? Why does she HAVE to make a name 4 herself?? Why does she HAVE to be a feminist?? More possibly than not, it turns her into a softer, shyer, and basically, more lady-like sanyukta.
Just like human beings have a knack 4 the 'missing tile syndrome', so do they have a knack 4 rebellion. Since this post is about sanyukta i shall leave the boys out of the equation, but notice it sometimes...the girls of a more modern thinking and 'Feminist' kinds of households, may put up an image of being a feminist...but peel away the mask and look inside them, and more often than not, u will find a soft spoken LADY. The same applies to patriarchal families, where the girl may put on a mask of being soft spoken...but peel that away, and u'll find a tigress inside.
I only hope that someday someone discovers this and makes a serial on the other side of the story too - the softer side of it.

Share UR views!!!
-Sanyu

Created

Last reply

Replies

9

Views

1.5k

Users

4

Likes

9

Frequent Posters

medha16 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#2

Originally posted by: -MysticAura-

Hola everyone

No, this is not the episode review post whic i generally make.
This is just a small analysis of Sadda Haq Season 1, to be specific of sanyukta's character, and also a general analysis of human behaviour.
Lets jzz quickly traipse through season 1.
Sanyukta Agarwal...the daughter of the rich mr kishore agarwal, a backward thinking, patriarchial man, who obviously demeans the status of women, condemning them to a more secondary status in his society. So, his daughter sanyukta is not allowed to study something she loves - Mechanical Engineering - snce her father thinks it is a "ladkon waala kaam" and that girls should not try to compete with men. Sanyukta rebels agains her father, an, as a result, ends up getting disowned by her own family. Her father DOES accept her later, but that is another story all together.
Lets just take into consideration, the human behaviour for a minute.
Have u guyz ever heard of the 'missing tile syndrome'??
I think not...
Well, the missing tile syndrome, is just a name given to a very normal aspect of human behaviour. Human beings tend to be a discontented lot, hence, they always tend to focus on, in simple terms, what they DONT have, rather than on what they do. So it is quite possible that a lady who thinks herself to be fat, walks into a room full of people and only notices what lovely figures the other women have. Or a man who doesnt have much hair could easily walk into a party and only notice the heads full of hair. It is a normal tendency of humans to do that. But sometimes, the missind tile syndroe applies not only to materialistic things like a figure and hair, but to mental conditions too.
So far, according to what we have seen in Sadda Haq season 1 and 2, sanyukta never had her father's support, in pursuing the career of her choice. She was a feminist by heart, Not an FCP, a female chauvnist pig (sorry, i kinda came up with that one😆) but yes, she does remain sensitive on the topic of gender bias.
Now for a moment, let us consider some totally different circumstances.
Sanyukta's surroundings remain the same, except for the mindsets of her parents. Mr agarwal is a modern, free thinking man, and so is her mom. They both believe that girls SHOULD, most certainly, go out into the world and make a name for themselves. They back sanyukta up every which way possible. They have full confidence in her, and so do expectations.
Now what happens to sanyukta??
Ofcourse, there is a chance that she thrives under this support of her parents, and excels in whatever she does. But is that all??
There is another possibility, that so much of support and expectation actually has the adverse effect on her - it crumbles her. Slowly, she begins thinking that there are so many expectations... why does she HAVE to do all that?? Why does she HAVE to make a name 4 herself?? Why does she HAVE to be a feminist?? More possibly than not, it turns her into a softer, shyer, and basically, more lady-like sanyukta.
Just like human beings have a knack 4 the 'missing tile syndrome', so do they have a knack 4 rebellion. Since this post is about sanyukta i shall leave the boys out of the equation, but notice it sometimes...the girls of a more modern thinking and 'Feminist' kinds of households, may put up an image of being a feminist...but peel away the mask and look inside them, and more often than not, u will find a soft spoken LADY. The same applies to patriarchal families, where the girl may put on a mask of being soft spoken...but peel that away, and u'll find a tigress inside.
I only hope that someday someone discovers this and makes a serial on the other side of the story too - the softer side of it.

Share UR views!!!
-Sanyu

@bold
I didn't quite get u.
what the hell does " feminism" have to do with being soft spoken n shy?
So, if I'm a hard core feminist, does that mean I'm not a lady? So Emma Watson n Deepika Padukone aren't ladies?
" modern thinking and feminist kinds of households" ...like what?
The whole point of feminism is based on equality...of choice, of opportunities, of respect.
I'm sorry but her wanting to be the best at her field has nothing to do with feminism. Please do not misrepresent the idea behind it...you are talking as if being a feminist is a problem for Sanyukta.

We don't ask men why he has to work or why he would want that most coveted promotion. She wants to make a name for herself because she is an individual who is focused on building a successful career like every other person.What else would she do? Sit at home n be the personal aide of her husband?

And Plz plz plz read up a little on feminism. You've got it all wrong.
Thank you.
Mystic_Aura thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#3
@Medha,
I think u have got me quite wrong, dear :)
I'll go through the points u have marked.
1)Why does she HAVE to make a name 4 herself?? Why does she HAVE to be a feminist?? More possibly than not, it turns her into a softer, shyer, and basically, more lady-like sanyukta.
--> U quite misunderstood this sentence. What i wanted to say is, that consider, for example, sanyukta's family is more of the feminist type, by which i mean that they r basically a modern thinking family. So they think a lot of sanyukta and have lots of expectations from her, not only in terms of success, but also in terms of thinking...they feel that she, too, should be a hardcore feminist [FEMINIST: a person who supports feminism. FEMINISM: the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.] But she, by nature, may be a soft spoken lady...someone who doesnt want to initiate fights and competitions, not if she can help it. Agreed the character of our sanyukta is very different and competitive, but people do, sometimes, adopt an alien nature due to compulsion of circumstances...u never know what she would have done had the circumstances been different. I can kind of guess where ur question came up from, if u look at the underlined part...that is it, isnt it?? By that, i did not mean those are MY words...those are the words of THAT sanyukta. Like, read - "Why do I have to be a feminist..."...etc"
2)the girls of a more modern thinking and 'Feminist' kinds of households, may put up an image of being a feminist...but peel away the mask and look inside them, and more often than not, u will find a soft spoken LADY. The same applies to patriarchal families, where the girl may put on a mask of being soft spoken...but peel that away, and u'll find a tigress inside.
--> To this line, you queried what i meant by "modern thinking and feminist kind of households". Well, by that, i mean, quite literally, a 360 degree turn from sanyukta's house. Got the idea?? Good.
3)what the hell does " feminism" have to do with being soft spoken n shy?
So, if I'm a hard core feminist, does that mean I'm not a lady? So Emma Watson n Deepika Padukone aren't ladies?
--> "Feminism" as a term, does not have anything to do with being soft spoken and shy, and neither do my words. I do not think i have rather implied that anywhere, and if i have i hope u'll be quite so nice as to inform me :) So, if u r a hardcore feminist, i am not the person to decide if u r a lady or not...we r not living in the old english age. where mischief was a boy's trait. And i am sorry, i have no knowledge of Emma watson or deepika padukone.

4)The whole point of feminism is based on equality...of choice, of opportunities, of respect.
I'm sorry but her wanting to be the best at her field has nothing to do with feminism. Please do not misrepresent the idea behind it...you are talking as if being a feminist is a problem for Sanyukta.
--> @Green- I agree, wholeheartedly.
-->@Black - I am afraid u have misconstrued my words. I have given the explanation for that before. And i never mentioned 'the idea of her wanting to do the best at her field'.

5) And Plz plz plz read up a little on feminism. You've got it all wrong.
-->As i have said before, u seem to have mis construed my words. I only thank u for being so patient as to read my reply till here, and hear out my explanations.

I'm afraid i might have been at fault for these misunderstandings of urs, for may be i have not been able to put forth my point in a legible and clear way. I hope i have succeeded in making you realize what i mean by my words now. Nevertheless, if i have not, i request u to put ur point forth too.

I am sorry if my words sound too old for my age. Being the youngest in the forum has its own disadvantages, i hope u will se that.
Thank you :)
-Sanyu


Edited by -MysticAura- - 9 years ago
Aurora2024 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#4
U said it's because of restrictions she became stubborn

If she got freedom then may be she'll depressed or overthink, right!

But baby whatever be the case or situation it's all about our psychology and understanding towards the situation.

Human Nature is quite more flexible and their thinking is just like a tide in a sea which has it's own way.

But u stated good point thatsomeone should make a story on other side of coin.

Getting motivation will boost your confidence but being compelled to do something will make us scared to accept the challenge. Getting priveleges will give u ease but over-pamperedness will spoil u.
😃
Edited by CrazyOeuvrer - 9 years ago
Mystic_Aura thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: CrazyOeuvrer

U said it's because of restrictions she became stubborn


If she got freedom then may be she'll depressed or overthink, right!

But baby whatever be the case or situation it's all about our psychology and understanding towards the situation.

Human Nature is quite more flexible and their thinking is just like a tide in a sea which has it's own way.

But u stated good point thatsomeone should make a story on other side of coin.

Getting motivation will boost your confidence but being compelled to do something will make us scared to accept the challenge. Getting priveleges will give u ease but over-pamperedness will spoil u.
😃

@Orange - Noo!!
Thats not what i mean at all. If she got freedom no doubt she'll make the best of it as she is doing now, THIS sanyu. I m just talking abt what she wud be like had her family atmosphere been different.
The rest...i totally agree wid u sona di😃
-Sanyu
muller thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#6
Had never heard about Missing tile syndrome, so thank you for making this post.

However i disagree with you, Sanyukta is not suffering (if that is the right word here) from Missing tile syndrome. She was not someone who focussed on the missing pieces rather just too focussed to achieve her dreams of becoming a mechanical engineer not because she was told not to but she was genuinely interested in the subject right from her childhood. It was like she had blinders on to keep the distractions at bay...She was not sitting around moping and cursing her fate, rather she took charge of her life and brought changes desirable to her. How would you explain the pains she took to give her entrance exam or to be able to stay at FITE. She was too enthusiastic to learn her trade. Never ever she felt jealous of anyone just because their parents approved of their college or the course they sought. She never entered into a room and envied people of their skills or degrees like the examples you stated of the bald man or the curvy lady. Even if she valued her fathers approval, i feel it was not the only driving force in her life to rebel in order to pursue her dreams.

For someone who is as motivated and passionate enough like Sanyukta, missing pieces or tiles make little difference in their way to achieve success and happiness.
Mystic_Aura thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#7
@Muller (Sorry i dont know ur name)
My dear, u are taking it quite the wrong way!! I dont know why everyone is doing that, but they certainly are!!!
Now, i never said that the missing tile syndrome was anything related to sanyukta. I DID mention it in my post, but as u can see, this post is mainly about human behaviour and i have given sanyukta as an example here. I do not mean to say, in any way, what u have said in your post. Please read the post carefully...those are two very different things :)
-Sanyu
muller thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: -MysticAura-

@Muller (Sorry i dont know ur name)

My dear, u are taking it quite the wrong way!! I dont know why everyone is doing that, but they certainly are!!!
Now, i never said that the missing tile syndrome was anything related to sanyukta. I DID mention it in my post, but as u can see, this post is mainly about human behaviour and i have given sanyukta as an example here. I do not mean to say, in any way, what u have said in your post. Please read the post carefully...those are two very different things :)
-Sanyu


You can call me muller and you are right i don't get it, why exemplify Sanyukta with a condition when you are not even relating it to her?

Now i am not good in human psychology and stuff but i feel Sanaya could have been a good example to bring your point across about how in your own words "support and expectation actually has the adverse effect - it crumbles her. Slowly, she begins thinking that there are so many expectations... why does she HAVE to do all that?? Why does she HAVE to make a name 4 herself?? "(Remember how she was pressurised by her father and was consequently disinclined to join ISRC )

I am deliberately omitting your points on feminism. Because even though Sadda Haq will score quite well in Bechdel test, i somehow can't pin Sanyukta or anyone else in the show as the poster girl for feminism, also i believe we have very different opinions on what is considered as" lady-like" behaviour.

Since everyone seems to be taking you wrong, why don't you try to be a bit more elaborate with your description to drive your message?

Mystic_Aura thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#9
@Muller-
Yes...i just wanted to clear out my own thoughts a bit. I did not really expect so many people to read this post, seeing as i did not even send out pms. i may not be wrong, i may just lack the ability to put forth my opinions properly. As i already said before, i am younger than all of the people in this forum nd have less experience, so naturally, u must be right. I hope i have not offended u in any way, and if i have i hope u'll 4give me
Since we seem to be having such starkly contrasting ideas, lets just extend the olive branch and agree to disagree 😊
-Sanyu
muller thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#10

My dear you have not offended me. Like i said i am not good at understanding human psychology that is why i asked you to put your point more clearly...You may be the youngest but you think maturely. Indeed age does not guarantee wisdom. The beauty of internet is that it does not matter who you are or how young you are, for everyone else you are just a username and your points can be approved or disapproved (sometimes even if you are right).

I deliberately let go off your points on feminism to prevent an argument. I want you to understand that your post can make any feminist uncomfortable. You did inadvertently imply they do not behave like a "lady" and for this reason you need to be more careful with your choice of words. It doesn't matter if your intent is honourable if your impact is not. 😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".