Originally posted by: xPalkix
If he wanted to put vidhya above everyone, why is he hiding the secret from her? And you don't forget about others just because you're married. How does that make sense?
Dharam hasn't changed, he has redeemed himself. That's what Meera has done as well. She was rude to Durga too initially but now she's changed her behaviour and attitude for the better.
And by telling his mum she's better off without Dharam, isn't putting vidhya in any trouble. In fact, Vidhya is someone who would understand and be happy for Durga.
Dharam can easily divorce Durga if he wanted to but he isn't. There is clearly something missing from the story and it probably has something to do with Shravans secret. And why should Dharam take all the blame, Meera too was involved in bigamy. But they've resolved that issue by thinking about others and taking responsibility. Even though, a paper can't wipe out your feelings and emotions, they tried to do the right thing. The only problem now is Dharam doesn't love Durga. If Dheera were wrong because it was bigamy, this marriage isn't right either. You can't just force two people together and expect things to work.
@Bold I don't think Shravans or vidhya would be effected if Durga gets a divorce but anyway...
Btw if they can't take a stand, why should Dheera? And Dharam did not marry Meera to take revenge for his fractured leg kya kuch bhi 😆 He did it because he was manipulated by his mum and because he wanted to take revenge against Kokila for unintentionally causing his uncle to commit suicide. Very different reasons.
Lol funny how you say let Durga be, it's her choice etc etc But, don't forget there are two in a marriage. If Durga deserves happiness then so does Dharam. If he isn't happy, then why should he stay in a baseless marriage? For him, title or no title, he belongs to Meera. And I personally think there is more to the story so I'm not going to comment on the 'few nights stand' point. How can you be sure that is exactly what happened? a) Shravan may not be his son. OR b) Sharavn may be his son but something happened between Durga and Dharam. OR c) your theory is correct.
Being a doormat is not a crime and I never said it was. But it's not right either. If my loved one was treated like a doormat, I would protest.
All redemption saga reminds me about Rashi, her redemption never stayed for long time. I never had any issue with her coz she used to plan and plot against idiot kokila and she was harmless. Redemption goes in gutter in this show once they get whatever they want. I am not saying dheera would definitely turn negative again but there are chances of them going back to their originality. Divorce won't make any difference for Durga, not like she would get 20 years younger guy like dharam got, even if she gets she would not fall in love and get married.
Dharam deserves happiness? When he was not happy? His happiness was in dedicating his entire life to his mother and he did that. How much more happiness?
I agree if in a marriage if 2 people are not happy then better to seperate but dharam was not happy from last 10 years. Why didn't he get divorce in those 10 years? He was happily living seperate but still married and after finding meera he suddenly realised he was never happily married. 😆 Or he never wanted to free Durga, so that her mom can blackmail shravan to marry Kokila's grand daughter? If that is the case he deserves what he is getting now. For divorce both partner should agree. If Durga doesn't want divorce, case would go in court and in court it won't be hard to prove dharam is a bigamist. Then instead of going on honeymoon with meera, he would go on jail tour. 😆
Secret? Could you elaborate? Shravan is doing no injustice with his mom, divorce won't change anything for his mom but it would change much for Vidya. Let them remain married at least for his relationship. Dharam wanted him to marry Vidya for revenge of Gaura and he did it, he used Vidya for this revenge even if it was against his wish, he can't keep playing with Vidya just to keep his father happy. What if after few years dharam demands kokila? He would start behaving like he is not happy with meera and kokila was never happy with parag coz of his unemployment. Does it mean shravan should think both couple are not happy, lets seperate them and make a new couple from broken couple? You cant keep giving dharam everything in thrname of his happiness. (Kokila one was just an example) AND best way to control dharam is not to give him freedom from Durga. If dharam wants divorce then he should become a bad person and take it. If meera wants dharam then she should become shameless and ask for it. No way shravan and Vidya should give them on platter.
To me it looked like he was more annoyed with fracture otherwise he would never fall in love with grand daughter of a lady who killed her uncle in la la land of her mother. Redemption doesn't mean you have to fall in love. Now, where is respect for her dead uncle?
Good if you have faith that there is some untold story. I don't get any sign of hidden story. And they won't waste time on dheera. This show cvs can't think beyond koki and Gopi. After exposing fake koki, they would bring fake gopi and same nonsense continues. Modis won't get freedom from trouble and Dharam would never stop doing havan for there protection, one day he would turn an official poojari.
Edited by Divine-Pearl - 9 years ago