was it fair? - Page 2

Originally posted by: advil

Well, had your fav won, would you still the same that it was predecided?

i think they were pre decided and i wanted aneek or amant to win so i am happy

Originally posted by: April2007

No it is not fair..

The shows should not promote regionalism it should promote talent.

Amanat is most talented singer, if people voted based on talent he should have won.

*****

i agree they shouldnt promote regoinallism and they should say were they came from that would have made a big difference

i think next time they should just avoid saying where the contestant is from........that is the only way we can have ppl vote for the most deserving instead of one who is from their city etc.

Originally posted by: ***srk***

i wanted to know something! actually i heard that in kolkata and rajastan, voting lines were free and so i wanted to know if it was fair that all the ppl who live in rajastan voted for raja and the one who lived in kolkata voted for aneek! i mean they cant vote just for a contestant coz he lives in the same city as them!😕

i mean even this is partiality, isnt it?

i think nowadays ppl dont vote honestly! but thats only my opinion and i dont know if i made my opinion clear or not! lolz im confused now!😛

it wuznt fair at all to amanat he deserved to win

Thats the thing about public voting...not everybody votes based on talent, not that either of the three weren't talented...its not fair, but thats how it goes, I guess...

sorry if my post was irrational! mods, plz feel free to close it!

and btw, i didnt mention it, but the same goes to all the ppl who voted for amanat only coz he was a pakistani too!

what i wanted to say throughout this post was that ppl shuldnt vote for someone because he is from a special city but because of his talent! 😊