Member of the Week : SmartDesiKid - Page 140

Originally posted by: vinnie-thepooh

My question for Sunny

which side of Ravanna had 4 heads and which side had 5 😉

when u look at him - 5 heads to the right, 4 heads to the left. five head s to HIS left, 4 head st oHIs right

Originally posted by: adi_0112

😆 Tanisha... EMAET khatam ho gaya..Lil champs chal raha hian..ab toh apni siggy se BS = MY JODI # 1 hata doh...😆

for some reason itz not working....i can't delete my posts either....😕

Originally posted by: adi_0112

OK Suny,

I am going to hijack your thread to make a post to some of my invisible friends :

IMPORTANT MESSAGE

Peeps(especially the newbie's, Goldies, and friends from outside SRGMP forum who have been sweet enough to PM me),

I had promised I'd reply to all your PM's...I had even put it in my siggy..but with every passing day the task is getting unreachable....the more I reply and bigger the backlog.😕

So I'll take this post to reply to all the backlogs at one go.😛

First of all, thanks for all your good wishes and thank you for considering me good enough to be your friend. I have read through the PM's, I may have missed out the essence from some of them due to the SMS lingo which I do not understand or the singificance of just the emoticons..but here is my condensed reply to all your queries on me :

1. My name is Adi. But I am NOT Adi, the TV star in some serial (I don't even know if that is his serial name or real name) and this therefore replies to those questions who think I am him. The Adi Fan club in celebrity corner is NOT dedicated to me. and no..if anyone bears an ID adi_fan or something similar..he or she is not my fan..but the TV actors fan.

2.If you want to know my details, whatever can be shared is available in my slambook & profile.Whatever is not available, it is intentional, because it is private and I do not believe I want to share it.

3.Last time I checked, my parents had just 2 sons.So all my sisters and brothers that I have in the forum are my forum sisters & brothers,soul sisters/brothers you may call them but unfortunately I have no blood relation with them.

4.Seema & me are very good forum friends..we just flirt in jest..in real life we are not getting married.

5.I am not looking for a bride here in the forum.

6.If you want to become friends with all here, just be yourself..there is no guideline book.Be nice to others and post interesting posts, people will definitely welcome you.By the way,welcome to the forum and hope you have a wonderful journey.

7. I am NOT MARRYING Aamna Shariff. We fool around in jest here at the forum but I do not even know her personally, have never spoken to her and 100% sure, she does not even know of my existence. Therefore, I am not usurping Rajeev's rights, or Bhaskar Bro's rights either..and MOST important-I DO NOT HAVE HER CONTACT NUMBER OR ADDRESS.

8. Yaar, I just had an accident a while back. I sound cuckoo too, but please don't make me a total crazy.NO, I am NOT having "MENTAL CONDITIONS".

These poeple, my sweet friends here were calling me crazy because I had the accident at a wee hours of dawn,because i had felt like going out for a drive at that time..but even my doctor has given me aclean chit..and you'll will be happy to know "I AM NOT MENTAL".Those get well messages were for me to recover from the accident damages.

9. In case you have not received a reply to your PM does not mean I am avoiding it.. or am snobbish..I just hadn't reached that far....next time please check your outbox to see if the message has been read..sending me multiple "😡" or"😕😭" will not help the scene either..it increases the backlog.

Once again, welcome to the forum...I have replied in a nutshell to all the pending PM's and now I am free.

😛😛😛

Appada,

haso haso..😆

Now that I have got it out of my to do list and out of my system ...reading it even I find it funny...

😆

here's a logical answer for asking logical questions:

If u ask logic questions - u need to know the answer..just by looking at thsese - some don't even make sence. So I will try my best to dodge the questions😡😆

Originally posted by: sp_2012

OK Suny Bhaiya

Set of Questions 2:

Logic Questions

Math

1.(2x^2-13x)^x^3+1 - what is it. ^X cubed then +1, or x to the power of 3+1...question dodged

2.Fresh Mango contains 70% water by weight whereas dry mango contains 10% water by weight. What is the weight of dry mango that can be obtained from 20 kg of Fresh Mango?

70% water by weight - what's that mean?? anotherquestion dodged

3.What is the sum of the infinite series 1 + 0.5 + 0.25 + 0.125 + 0.0625 + ... ?

well, u just said Infinite...so INFINTI

4.An easy one. Solve for x:

7x - 2 = 4x + 1

X =1

5.What is the slope of the line tangent to the parabola f(x) = x^2 + 1 at x = 2?

the slope is rise over run. A parabola has no certain slope

Science

6.I am somewhere on earth. I go one mile south, one mile east, and one mile north and I am back where I started. Where must I be?

u are approx. 1.414 miles away from where u started

7.What are the subtractive colours of the optics colour wheel?

um.

8.The neutrino associated with the decay of a neutron was postulated in 1931 by which famous physicist?In the 1930's, scientists exploring the nascent field of nuclear physics were confronted with a troubling mystery: one of their most cherished laws appeared to be no longer valid.

Natural scientists had postulated "conservation laws" to assist in their understanding of the physical world. Isaac Newton established the constancy of momentum, a quantity specific to a moving object's state of motion. In the nineteenth century physicists and chemists such as Joule, Kelvin, and Carnot developed the science of thermodynamics, outlining the rules of heat and its exchange, a science of great importance to the Industrial Revolution that would soon follow. Rudolf Clausius first put forth the principle of conservation of energy--also called the first law of thermodynamics--stating that there is a constant amount of energy in the universe. In any change we observe, energy can be transformed from one form into another--from heat into motion, say--but it cannot be created or destroyed.

By the early part of the twentieth century Albert Einstein had formulated his famous equation stating that energy and mass were also interchangeable. In a revolution just as significant as that of the earlier century, physicists had begun to unravel the mysteries of the atom and its individual particles, a science they called quantum mechanics.

Throughout these scientific milestones, the concept of energy remained central, and its conservation well established. No matter how a closed system of particles, machine parts, or planets moved and interacted, they did so in a way that left the total energy of the system constant. That energy could be energy of motion, or heat, or radiation, but in the accounting book of the universe, the amount of energy in a system stayed constant. It seemed a fundamental principle of the universe.

Is energy really conserved?
Given what seemed the universality of this principle, physicists were quite surprised to discover a situation where energy appeared not to be conserved: a reaction called beta decay. The nuclei of some atoms are unstable and spontaneously emit an electron (a "beta particle"), and in the process change into a stable nucleus of a different element. (For example, a carbon nucleus with six protons and eight neutrons can eject an electron and change into a nitrogen nucleus with seven protons and seven neutrons.) But when the scientists measured the masses and energies of the particles visible before and after the beta decay, they discovered to their consternation that neither energy nor momentum appeared to be conserved. The nucleus appeared to break into two pieces--but the pieces didn't fit together. The Danish physicist Niels Bohr even dared to suggest that perhaps energy was not conserved after all.

The hallowed conservation laws were saved, though, when the German physicist Wolfgang Pauli postulated in 1931 that in fact a third particle was emitted in beta decay. (This apparent salvation came from a genius who once complained that physics was too hard and he wished he had become a movie comedian!) This particle, he said, would have no mass and no electric charge, and the fact that it had a particular value of a third conserved quantity called "spin" meant it could not be the already discovered quantum of light, the photon.Enrico Fermi subsequently christened Pauli's newcomer the neutrino, which means "little neutral one" in Italian.

The neutrino remained immune from direct detection until 1956, when Frederick Reines, Clyde Cowan, Jr., and collaborators mounted an experiment at the Savannah River nuclear reactor in South Carolina. They monitored nuclear reactions in which the electron's opposite twin, an antiparticle called a "positron," was emitted. ( Antiparticles have the same mass and spin as their particle partners, but opposite values of electric charge. Every known particle has such an associated antiparticle, although the universe predominantly consists of matter, not antimatter.) This first sighting of the antineutrino won Reines the 1995 Physics Nobel Prize.

Neutrinos and antineutrinos were unlike any particle seen before. Most characteristic was their shyness--neutrinos hardly interacted with anything. In fact, about 100 trillion neutrinos pass straight through your body each second. Neutrinos interact with other matter so weakly that they can travel through trillions of miles of lead without interacting.

A second type of neutrino
In 1962 three Columbia University physicists discovered a second type of neutrino, a discovery that also won a Nobel Prize. Working at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, Leon Lederman,Melvin Schwartz, and Jack Steinberger observed the decay of a nuclear particle called the pion. Decaying pions produce muons, particles similar to electrons but about 207 times more massive, and presumably neutrinos. The fast-moving muons were filtered out by a wall built of 5,000 tons of old battleship plating, but the neutrinos passed right through.

This new neutrino was called the "muon neutrino," because it was found in particle reactions involving the muon. The earlier type of neutrino was dubbed the "electron neutrino." Neutrinos were said to come in two "flavors," the electron kind, and the muon kind. Neither flavor had an electric charge nor (at the time) a discernible mass.

In their work to elucidate the internal structure and energy source of our sun, nuclear physicists found that the sun emits enormous numbers of neutrinos. To observe such neutrinos physicists have had to go underground--deep underground. Because the earth is bombarded not just with neutrinos but with a host of charged particles called cosmic rays, physicists trying to catch the former needed to screen out the latter. They did this by placing their detectors in underground mine chambers, such as the Homestake gold mine in South Dakota. The 4,850 feet (1,480 meters) of rock above the chamber stopped the cosmic rays, but as always the neutrinos passed through like ghosts. Inside the mine chamber was a large tank of chlorinated cleaning fluid; very infrequently one of the neutrinos would collide with a chlorine nucleus in the fluid and change it into an argon nucleus. The argon produced in this process is radioactive; by measuring the amount of radioactive argon, the number of neutrinos from the sun could be inferred.

Where are the sun's neutrinos?
Physicists had been studying such solar neutrinos for nearly thirty years, and they had once again been confronted with a mystery--they only observed about half the electron neutrinos that the sun was expected to emit, based on the energy it was known to produce.

Once again physicists had to let go of their old ideas and try to imagine the creativity of Nature. One solution to the "solar neutrino problem" would be if neutrinos could oscillate--if, in the course of their travels through space, an electron neutrino could spontaneously change into a muon (or other kind of) neutrino. The Homestake detector would not respond to muon neutrinos, so as far as the cleaning fluid was concerned, some fraction of the sun's electron neutrinos had disappeared.

Quantum mechanics, however, implied something more: neutrino oscillations, if they existed, require neutrinos to have mass. It could be a very small mass, but it could not be zero. (A tight neutrino burst observed from supernova 1987A meant that oscillating neutrinos would have very little mass indeed.) In addition, because the universe is flooded with neutrinos, any neutrino mass at all could be a significant fraction of the mass of the universe. In fact, astrophysicists that have been measuring the mass of the universe, collected mostly in stars, have not seen as much mass as they expected, based on the rotating motion of galaxies and other considerations. Could neutrinos be the "missing mass" of the universe?

A 1995 experiment at Los Alamos National Laboratory stunned the physics community when it reported instances in which a neutrino of one flavor transformed itself into a neutrino of another flavor. It offered a tantalizing hint that neutrino oscillations might be real.

In 2000, scientists at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory ("Fermilab") made the first direct observation of a third flavor of neutrino, the tau neutrino. It was associated with the tau lepton, a quite massive cousin of the electron and the muon, discovered in 1975.

The Standard Model
The three flavors of leptons (electron, muon, and tau), their antiparticles, and their associated neutrinos and antineutrinos have taken their place in the "Standard Model" of particle physics. Somewhat like the chemists' periodic table of the elements, the Standard Model lays out all the particles, their properties, and their specific interactions that comprise everything seen in the universe. Though there is still some debate about some of its details--such as neutrino properties and the way that gravity fits into it--the Standard Model has shown itself to be quite successful as a theory of the workings of the subatomic world.

Physicists have continued to make progress on understanding neutrino oscillations and the question of neutrino mass. In 1998 the Super-Kamiokande Experiment in Japan found stronger evidence for a nonzero neutrino mass, indicating that neutrinos are oscillating. In 2001 the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) in Canada discovered the strongest evidence yet that neutrinos are oscillating into one another. An underground detector similar to Homestake and Super-Kamiokande, SNO is a 10-story-tall apparatus located 1.2 miles (2 kilometers) underground, containing about 1,000 tons (almost one million kilograms) of heavy water. "Heavy water" is chemically the same as regular water, but its hydrogen nuclei all have a proton and a neutron (instead of normal hydrogen's solo proton).) Electrons produced when electron neutrinos collide with a heavy water nucleus emit a characteristic light when they travel rapidly through the water, which SNO detects via thousands of detection tubes that line the inside of its tank.

In 2002 SNO strengthened its results, with scientists saying they were now 99.999% certain that solar neutrinos oscillate one into the other, and that "the results were in excellent agreement with calculations of the nuclear reactions powering the sun." SNO has not, however, been able to make any conclusions about neutrino types that might exist in addition to the three already known today (e.g., the so-called "sterile" neutrinos), or whether these three "normal-flavor" neutrinos might be oscillating back and forth into sterile ones.

The further solidifying of the evidence for neutrino oscillation moves us farther along a voyage physicists embarked upon more than 70 years ago. It demonstrates once again that, as scientist J.B.S. Haldane noted, the universe is not only stranger than we do suppose, but stranger than we can suppose. Neutrino scientists are actively striving to understand the details of neutrino oscillations, to someday measure the masses of the three neutrino flavors, and to completely understand their role in the evolution of the universe. The wispy neutrino is a particle whose time has most definitely arrived.

9.In 1935 Yukawa predicted the existence of the pi-meson. In which year was it finally discovered?

(I'll give you a clue - 19__) 1982

10.Which of the following is NOT associated with oxidation?

PCC
LiAlH4
Jones Reagent
Hot KMnO4

History

11.This is the year that the Wright Brothers flew their first plane.1932

12.This is the year that George Washington was elected first president of the United States.

1732 -33

13.This was the year that the Republican Party was founded.

1803

14.Which was the first political association formed by Indians in India?

um....

15.This gentleman, the father of India's first Nobel Prize Winner and a member of the Bramho Samaj, went on to start the Bengal Association.

Now that wasn't hard was it?

of course it was...Now I go eat breakfast..an I skipped a lot of question either cuz they didn't make sence, my eye's hurt, I'm tired, or i am hungry

Originally posted by: desi.babe

hey ..u tell ma 2day whatz going on 😕

ummmmm

Originally posted by: filmi_chick99

okay question time SDK...



1) Pretend you are a Sharib fan. Give me 10 reasons why . 😳

cuz u told me to pretend I am

2) Name Sharib's best performance.

Ya ali

3) Name the 3 best performances of EMET according to you (you can only have 1 performance per jodi)

Hema and Nihira - Sabse Alag
the first song by HH - LL
UA's Lamha lamh lmha

4) So do you like these questions???

I didn't hate them

okay...

more questions:



1) Who is your fav Lil Champs contestant???

2) Best performance of lil Champs till date is.....

3) Which judge do you like best???