If stars matter so much and if they are truly the embodiment of the participants' efforts and talent they have displayed thus far, how come sometimes none of the GGs' comments match the stars they give? Let's forget about Leslie's EMET stars for a moment. Consider the 'It's the time to disco' performance by UA. Ujjaini was praised to death, but Aishwarya was only considered decent. Since this is a jodi competition, there must have been something missing in their performance to cause Aishwarya to be inferior in comparison to Ujjaini, yet they still received full stars from the GGs.
I can say the same for Sharib who has been equally praised by the GGs but he hasn't ever received 7 stars from HH? Why? Most likely because of Banjo. That makes sense since the competition is based on jodis. However, UA in an almost identical situation were given 7 stars. These stars are confusing and have a constant habit of contradicting not only the themselves, but the GGs' comments as well. And don't go telling me it's because of the chemistry in UA's jodi. The stars for chemistry is LL's responsibility, not HH's.