Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

1.1k

Users

9

Frequent Posters

aiks thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: RudhzStar

I don't understand. What do you mean talent ki har? They are all talented and good singers on their own way. This public voting system is merely a competition between these talented singers. It's not about who has talent and who doesn't, TV isn't the only jodi with talent.

Hariji needs to stop whining about the public voting. EMET is a competition, but it is also a game... it has rules. Before they were chosen as gurus i'm sure he must have read the rules of this game. Granted that they are talented singers and they are a better judge than the audience, but that is why they have the veto power and that is why they give stars to the singers. As Shaan stated, the gurus are their to guide the public voting, and that in itself plays a very important role. And there is nothing going wrong with the public voting. Without the guru's guidance, TV would probably not have even reached 4th position. Hariji is forgetting that now that there are very few jodis left, the competition is getting really tough and the competition between them is not about who has talent and who lacks talent because clearly all the jodis have talent. But the gurus fail to realize this.

And Leslie said that the audience chose not to give a musically incline decision... that was his opinion that TV was the best. Even if they did perform better than the other jodis, the others still have the same potential and ability to perform well on stage. That is primarily why there is no harm or loss of talent with TV being voted out.

Speaking of which, the gurus may not have full control of the elimination process, but they are gurus for a reason. They have the power to rate each jodi and use the veto power, but in return they have a responsibility. And that is to be gurus and treat the jodis equally showing how each one of them can improve. But instead, they choose to be bias and lean towards favoritism as shown with the elimination of TV. And this whole favoritism thing with the gurus lets down the other jodis and it's a little insulting to them since it becomes clear to them that the gurus have chosen one jodi completely over them.

Talent ki har i mean the one who deserves to win never wins.

Sima Samuel thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: RudhzStar

I don't understand. What do you mean talent ki har? They are all talented and good singers on their own way. This public voting system is merely a competition between these talented singers. It's not about who has talent and who doesn't, TV isn't the only jodi with talent.

Hariji needs to stop whining about the public voting. EMET is a competition, but it is also a game... it has rules. Before they were chosen as gurus i'm sure he must have read the rules of this game. Granted that they are talented singers and they are a better judge than the audience, but that is why they have the veto power and that is why they give stars to the singers. As Shaan stated, the gurus are their to guide the public voting, and that in itself plays a very important role. And there is nothing going wrong with the public voting. Without the guru's guidance, TV would probably not have even reached 4th position. Hariji is forgetting that now that there are very few jodis left, the competition is getting really tough and the competition between them is not about who has talent and who lacks talent because clearly all the jodis have talent. But the gurus fail to realize this.

And Leslie said that the audience chose not to give a musically incline decision... that was his opinion that TV was the best. Even if they did perform better than the other jodis, the others still have the same potential and ability to perform well on stage. That is primarily why there is no harm or loss of talent with TV being voted out.

Speaking of which, the gurus may not have full control of the elimination process, but they are gurus for a reason. They have the power to rate each jodi and use the veto power, but in return they have a responsibility. And that is to be gurus and treat the jodis equally showing how each one of them can improve. But instead, they choose to be bias and lean towards favoritism as shown with the elimination of TV. And this whole favoritism thing with the gurus lets down the other jodis and it's a little insulting to them since it becomes clear to them that the gurus have chosen one jodi completely over them.

well said rudhzstar...👏

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".