Himesh’s technical ability a suspect - Page 5

Originally posted by: jmn7

Neeraj,Shiv-hari themselves said that one cannot become a music
composer by training.Have you heard of mozart's 40th symphony,or
beethoven's 9th symphony.Those master pieces cannot be composed by
training.It requires intuition,understanding of music.

Originally posted by: mdroy

As for Mozart and Beethoven please ntoe that both did have immense
natural talent and extensive training (please refer to wikipedia.org for
more info). It is well known to most music students that Mozart received
intensive musical training from his father, including instruction in both
clavier and violin. Also Beethoven's first music teacher was his fatherand
later was given instruction and employment by Christian Gottlob Neefe.

As a fan and student of their music, I find it appaling that someone would
compare HR to them in any way. They should only be compared to other
classical musicians.

That brings me to another point. I think that while most of us enjoy
popular and modern music, it can never take away the importance of
classical music and training and appreciation. That's why classical music
is timeless and its appeal is eternal.

Originally posted by: mdroy

As for Mozart and Beethoven please ntoe that both did have immense
natural talent and extensive training (please refer to wikipedia.org for
more info). It is well known to most music students that Mozart received
intensive musical training from his father, including instruction in both
clavier and violin. Also Beethoven's first music teacher was his fatherand
later was given instruction and employment by Christian Gottlob Neefe.

As a fan and student of their music, I find it appaling that someone would
compare HR to them in any way. They should only be compared to other
classical musicians.

That brings me to another point. I think that while most of us enjoy
popular and modern music, it can never take away the importance of
classical music and training and appreciation. That's why classical music
is timeless and its appeal is eternal.

Originally posted by: preetie

if you want to talk about that this copying business can go in different tangents: diff cars in the market in comparison to 50 yrs ago. obviously there was someone was first to invent, pharmacuetical drugs copied by generic companies, first person who published first newpaper etc etc etc...everyone is inspiried or in your books copied from some where.

Originally posted by: preetie

I think you are the confused big time here. If you look hard enough in every direction original idea whether it is music or movies or anything else is utilized by various people. So what is the big deal.

Originally posted by: riddler100

One point I would want to make here is that if a song has been copied note-for-note from an original (or close enough), very few MDs here have the courtsey to credit the original composer. Maybe, its the fear of paying out royalties?

Also, Preetie, to answer your earlier Q, II and KBC did get syndication from the original shows. Even S-E-L paid some kind of royalty for using Pretty Woman in KHNH. This kind of "copying", I believe is ok if the original gets credited and gets his/her dues...

Originally posted by: preetie

riddler- I know that. What i find in here is that people start putting people down for their own pleasure. some hate paresh, some hate vinit, nihira, etc etc. list just goes on. There is no balance critique. One should have open mind in giving out their opinion. I think himesh is acting like a goof on TV in supporting vinit however I don't discredit him for his work. Some poeple here are claiming to be music experts. if they are then what are they doing on line, they should be making name for themselves with their talent.