Anami and Tanya pawns in the chess board

Seems like Pujan has his target set. Use Avdhoot to trap young innocent Tanya and keep her as bait to check in CBI officer Adhiraj. Mostly use and throw type relation. Tanya had warned Adhiraj to stay away from Lal Mahal. But Adhiraj wanted to go to Lal Mahal and somewhere both brother and sister are going to get hurt in the process.

Sudha wants Narotham to use Anami as the pawn. A brother is going to use sister as the pawn for his mother's battle against the family.

See when Pujan uses Tanya it is fine. Men are like that, they use women as pawns to get what they want. But Sudha using Anami. This is where patriarchy has always won . Yes injustice has happened to Sudha. But when she uses that injustice as a bait to trap another girl, to do injustice to another girl she fails as a woman. Instead of telling her son to respect his half sister if she tells use her, then she is bringing up a similar generation that has disregard to women. A generation which believes they have the right to belittle and berate women. It is justifying the rape culture, angry young man culture and what not.

We women has to understand the kind of injustice that has happened to us should never happen to our daughters, our sisters.

In a way Gayatri Devi is standing up for her grand daughter. She is not hearing the patriarchy and using her tests to validate her thoughts. I loved her look on the dining table at the men.

Also silent message does pass through Satrupa and Gayatri Devi. Yes Pujan can tell Gayatri will never support Satrupa, maybe their difference arose because of Satrupa handling business and that was not Gayatri Devi wanted in her bahu. Because in FB we are shown Gayatri Devi and Satrupa having a loving chat during Satrupa's pregnancy. It was an MIL who was telling her DIL she is expecting twins and grand son and a grand daughter. So yes Gayatri Devi and Satrupa had shared something sweet in the past when it came to family.

So whatever be the equation of Gayatri Devi with Satrupa, her mamta for Anami will make her do things which she doesnt do otherwise. So Pujan can get some shocks from her.

Anyways the Mahabharath looks interesting.

Pujan's plans are going to harm Tanya. But Right now Narottam will just play a weakling and try to get into anami's good books. Tanya has no place in this Chakravyuh, it is really not her battle. Whereas for Anami this Chakravyuh starts and ends with her

Another thing if Narottam us living in LalMahal right from his childhood, how did Sudha get to influence him. What about the scenes where he us shown dancing wearing ghungroo and the scenes were he is self inflicting him with pain. Nobody loves him not even his mother.

However, I beg to differ on the Anami thoughts. Sudha is a psychotic woman who will stop at nothing to get her revenge/haq/or whatever she wants. She is using her own son. She has turned him into an obsessive, hated, pessimistic person who just can't see the good in anyone. Anami wants to leave LM yet she stood by Narottam and he didn't even for a second think of what that signified. That's what Sudha has made him into. If a woman can use her own child like that and fill him with such hatred, then whether she uses a female or a male for her plans, it makes no difference. Because for Sudha another person's life and honour has no meaning. These type of people are worse than the Pujans and Avdhoots of the world. At least with such men you know what their thinking is, what they can do, and where their sight lands. With people like Sudha you never know. She could use Anami today and then suddenly decide to change tactics. She could use her son and then throw him away like yesterday's garbage. She could even kill the man she once "loved" for the sake of reaching her end goal. I say "loved" in quotes because I don't think people like Sudha have the capability to love.

Up till now I kept thinking that Sudha was doing everything for her child, to get him back, to give him the haq he deserves, to be in his life, but given that Narottam knows about her and is involved in her plans, I have no empathy or sympathy left for her.