Originally posted by: tvbuf
Since the debacle of a marriage, Rudra has claimed to make Paro's life miserable, and although he has been a protector, he has never shown her his love.
I can protect someone without being in love with them.
How is Paro supposed to understand his protecting her to be love ? His words belie his actions. What exactly has he done for his marriage, except marry her in a nautanki, and claim to one and all that he will make her life miserable every single day ?
I know we women, when we ask a guy to stop smoking, get taken as being in love with that guy (this happened to me in college), but as a woman I can tell you that I will never trust a guy easily, not until I have it in writing in his blood.
So I don't blame Paro for being insecure, and Rudra's stating - hamaare beech mein kucch ho ya na ho - lends credence to her insecurities. Its like he is telling her - babe there will never be anything between us.
So Paro has every right to be insecure, especially when the object of his lust is in her face.
Yes, Paro shouldn't try to befrend Laila, but as Paro said - Rudra has to decide if he loves Paro, whether Laila is there or not, because, Rudra claims that he has no feelings for Laila.
Any woman would want to know of her husband's love, even though the long term goal is to leave him. This is probably womanly vanity.