Ramayana 3oth June episode review

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

Posted: 17 years ago

#11

I am writing on the basis of Valmiki Ramayan. It will be shown.

Quote

246851

Hibernated

Posted: 17 years ago

#12

offcourse it will be shown, let sugreeb be teh king first, then will be teh marraige and then all those stuff

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Charu

@Krinya

Trailblazer

+ 8

Posted: 17 years ago

#13

that's surprising! never heard of this before. but this is not fair. in the prev. Ramayan Ramji was giving lecture to vali that badi bhabhi is like maa and chote bhai ki wife is like a sister. if sugreev married tara after vali's death tht means there's no diff. b/w vali and sugreev. how cud ramji take his help?

Quote

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

Posted: 17 years ago

#14

Hi Luv_khwaish, there is difference between what Sugreev and Vali did. Sugreev married Tara when Vali was thought to be dead. He did not force Tara to be with him. But Vali forcibly took Ruma with him when he knew that Sugreev was alive.

Quote

kavi42

@kavi42

Inactive

Posted: 17 years ago

#15

i have read kamba ramayan in tamil and in it it is said that when sugreev became the king of vanaras his wife ruma became the queen and tara was made the rajamata and angad the son of bali was made the yuvraj.

Quote

Shruti

@Shruti11

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 17 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: kavi42
i have read kamba ramayan in tamil and in it it is said that when sugreev became the king of vanaras his wife ruma became the queen and tara was made the rajamata and angad the son of bali was made the yuvraj.

well it was done after ram ji killed bali sugreev become king ruma queen tara as rajmata and ramji made bali son angad as yuvraj of kishkindha

Quote

Alka Rao

@secretz

Navigator

Posted: 17 years ago

#17

But still confusing.. 😕 On 1st July when Bali was thought to be dead Sugreev did not Marry Tara??? 😕 I think I will read the Ramayana.

Edited by secretz - 17 years ago

Quote

246851

Hibernated

Posted: 17 years ago

#18

well difefrent versions of ramayan vary but orginal valmiki ramayan has it that sugreeb will officially marry tara, i have read it .

Quote

saccy_mybaba

@saccy_mybaba

Beginner

Posted: 17 years ago

#19

IT IS A TRUE FACT THAT SUGRIVA MARRIED VALI'S WIDOW TARA AFTER THE DEATH OF VALI

SUGRIVA WAS NO LAKSHMANA WHO WOULD CONSIDER HIS 'BHABHI' AS HIS MOTHER.

it has been stated in valmiki ramayana by valmiki himself that after the death of vali,sugriva married his widow tara and during 4 months of rainy season he has lots of sexual enjoyment with his 'original' wife ruma and newly acquired tara.

when lakshmana had gone to sugriva to complained about the delay then sugriva terrified and sent tara who was having sex with her new husband sugriva and she protected sugriva by arguing with lakshmana about the powers of sex and lust,tara was half nude when she came to meet lakshmana and lakshmana bowed down his head in shame when he saw her.(can see this whole under kishkindha kand of www.valmikiramayana.net )

http://www.valmikiramayan.net/kishkindha/sarga29/kishkindha_29_frame.htm

and

http://www.valmikiramayan.net/kishkindha/sarga33/kishkindha_33_frame.htm

the kamban ramayana version of sugriva tara episode is wrong because the kamban wrote his version in 16th century while valmiki wrote his ramayana(which is the original one) in the era of lord rama while consulting with seetaji,lord rama and lakshmana as well.

it was said sage valmiki had got yogic powers and while he meditated every scene of ramayana ocurrs in his vision and he wrote it as exactly and precisely without any alteration and change (like sanjay in mahabharatha saw the battle and narrated it to dhritrashtra)

BUT

KAMBAN CONSIDERED MORALITY AND INFUSED THE FICTIONAL ELEMENT OF SUGRIVA TREATING TARA AS MOTHER FIGURE AND KAMBAN ALTERED THE FACTS AND EVENTS ESPECIALLY INCASE OF SUGRIVA AND TARA.

IT WAS ALSO STATED IN RAMCHARIT MANAS BY TULSIDAS IN A VERSE THAT

SUGRIVA AND VIBHISHANA REPEATED THE SAME SIN OF VALI(MARRYING BROTHERS' WIFE) BUT LORD RAMA FORGAVE THEM AND DID NOT GAVE ANY PUNISHMENT TO THEM THAT WAS LORD RAMA'S LOVE FOR HIS DEVOTEES

HERE IS THAT LINK

http://www.new.dli.ernet.in/data/upload/0047/947/TXT/00000033.txt

THIS IS THE TRUTH OF SUGRIVA AND VIBHISHANA THEY WERE NOT AS PIOUS AND PURE AS LAKSHMANJI.