my message to coolviewbie & goodbye forever !!!!!

Page

Next Last

sita

@sitakshii

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

ok i knew that our coolviewbie is gonna give that kind of treatment to me, i made a sarcastic & a bit teasing post for once in my life on this forum just to check what action our coolviewbie is gonna take & my guess was so perfect ,our respected coolviewbie who never ever gave any suggestions of warning types to all those members who hv been the trouble makers on the forum but for once i made a sarcastic post immediately i got some really cool warnings !!!! wow !!! i am loving this partiality ,our coolviewbie can tolerate the rude comments abt our new RAMAYAN like a memebr pallavi ,musical aishjwarya & durga called our new RAMAYAN dialouges cheap ,memebr gopdisone most of the times mocked & created prob for all of us !!!! sitalakshmi mocked at debina,ankit & our RAMAYAN like hell ,sitalakshmi comapred me with ravan in her thread ,that is untolerable !!!!!!

every memebr knows tht very well ,so now all the best to the coolviewbie of this forum ,do take all responsibilitieson ur shoulders even of writing the updates ,i am quitting the forum for sure ok good bye forever ,lemme say this that admin mods can very well check the inbox of any memeber (i wanna correct our coolviewbie at this point) ,i cannot anymore take this ssort of treatment ,& i don't want this thread of mine to b closed !!!! as this is what i honestly feel !!!!

friends enjoy the forum with such troublemakers !!!!

me & sonyfan are the ones who put our so much effort for the dev of this forum ,but it seems our efforts are being wasted if such kind of disgusting treatment i am gonna get !!!!

byeforever!!!

many memebrs knew what i hv been trying to tell the mods but here the mods r so partial ,so i hv to step down !!!!

thanks !!!

Edited by sita11 - 16 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Bhoot is active

@chatterbox

Trailblazer

+ 14

Posted: 16 years ago

oye oye

what is this sita

comeon

u r part of dev team and u know ur responsiblity well

and i think mods have hard time as it is with lots of trouble makers all over so dont take anything personal level

i wud advise u to keep a cool head and just ignore the posts which hurt u

i know there r some posts which r just how do i put it too inflammatory if there is such a word ur job is to inform the mods who wud do the necessary action not just get provoked

sita please stay back we need u here dont be hasty

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

You are completely wrong. I made lots of posts warning the trouble makers. I even trashed various posts made by trouble makers. I even closed various threads in which this new Ramayan and its actors have been bashed.

[quote=sita11]wow !!! i am loving this partiality ,our coolviewbie can tolerate the rude comments abt our new RAMAYAN like a memebr pallavi ,musical aishjwarya & durga called our new RAMAYAN dialouges cheap ,memebr gopdisone most of the times mocked & created prob for all of us !!!! sitalakshmi mocked at debina,ankit & our RAMAYAN like hell ,sitalakshmi comapred me with ravan in her thread ,that is untolerable !!!!!![qiote]

This is the problem. Fans of new Ramayan think that I am partial towards the fans and old Ramayan and the fans of old Ramayan think that I am partial towards the fans of new Ramayan.

If you read that post, you will find that I wrote clearly that it was wrong for SitaLaxmi to send such a PM to me. But you are considering only what I wrote to you and ignorning everything that I wrote to others.

[quote]every memebr knows tht very well ,so now all the best to the coolviewbie of this forum ,do take all responsibilitieson ur shoulders even of writing the updates ,i am quitting the forum for sure ok good bye forever ,lemme say this that admin mods can very well check the inbox of any memeber (i wanna correct our coolviewbie at this point)[/quote]

As far as I know, admins can check inboxes but not other mods. But I will check again. If I am wrong, then thanks for correcting me and I stand corrected.

Quote

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

To Sita11 and all those who think that I am partial in favour of the fans of old Ramayan: -

Read the following thread, which I think is the first thread made by SitaLaxmi in this forum.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/1038270/you-all-are-crazy

Please see my reply in that thread. I clearly wrote to SitaLaxmi that it was wrong to make such threads. And I also closed that thread. So how can you say that I allow such posts?

See the following thread. In that SitaLaxmi bashed the new Ramayan and the thread has been closed. I remember very well that I closed that thread.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/1038045/this-ramayan-not-good-at-all

Read the following thread.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/1039678/i-was-so-kidding-please-forgive-me

In that SitaLaxmi clarified that she was kidding and apologized. Before that, I told her not to make such posts and I also closed her threads. But when she makes a post, which is not at all offensive, then why should I blame her? The earliest posts made by her were offensive and I warned her and closed those. But the post in which she asked members to update her with what happened recently in the serial, was not at all offensive. So, why should I blame her for that?

What my point is that consider some member XYZ. He/she makes a post, which is offensive. I warn him/her for that. The same member makes another post, which is not at all bad. Will it be good if I warn him/her for that post too? I do not think so.

Now read the following thread in which a member named Sachin (username saccy_mybaba) made really offensive posts:-
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/1049731/real-truth-of-sugriva-and-vibhishana
Read the last post in that thread, which was made by me. In that I clearly wrote to Sachin that the posts were offensive and I closed that thread. So, how can you say that I allow such posts?

Check the following thread.

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/1053529/sunil-lahri-or-ankit-arora
In that, in roughly the later half of the thread, Ankit was called better than Sunil. I allowed such posts.

To all those who feel that I am partial in favour of the fans of new Ramayan:-

See the following thread.

https://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1051949
In that some members called old Ramayan as better. I allowed those posts.

See the following:-

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/1053529/sunil-lahri-or-ankit-arora
In some of the posts of that thread, including the posts in the beginning, some members called Sunil Lahiri as better than Ankit. I allowed those posts.

Please see the following thread started on 28 Feb:-
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/875485/what-you-feel-about-ankit-lakshman

In that please see all the posts from the first till (and including) the post made by viri_7 on 29Feb. In these posts, some people called old casts as better and some called new casts as better. I allowed all these posts, so where is the partiality?
radhika_cute revived the thread on 1 Dec. Then I wrote that please do not make comparisons.

In the past lots of posts were made, where some members criticized certain things shown and also the actings of certain casts in the new Ramayan. And later on, some of the same members started liking the new Ramayan and the acting of its casts. All of these posts were allowed by me because these did not violate IF's codes and also these did not lead to quarrels at that time.

___________________________________________________

One question can be asked as to why I allowed comparison earlier but now I wrote that comparisons should not be made? This is because comparisons, in themselves, are not bad, so I allowed them earlier. But recently I started seeing lots of quarrels because of comparisons - that is why I decided to disallow them.

So now comparisons are not allowed. I agree that even after the decision of not allowing comparison has been made, you must have found some threads making comparisons and I not closing those threads. This is because I cannot be expected to be 24 hours on IF and read all posts made here. Sometimes it happens that by the time I see such threads, lots of posts have already been made in them and Yummys has closed those threads. So, there is no need of me of closing those again.

Earlier, when I allowed comparisons, I allowed both ways. Now that the decision has been taken that comparisons should be avoided, I have written clearly that comparisons both ways should be avoided. So, where is partiality then?

Quote

sita

@sitakshii

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

oh really akhl ,how easily ur taking the credit of closing the threads,yummys know very well tht how many pm's i send to her for closing all those bashy threads, yummys actually used to close the thread not you !! sam,rupali & coolpurvi know tht very well ,i told them tht akhl never closes any thread & i hv top beg like a beggar & every time he says all opinions r welcomed ,what the hell man ??? where r the warnings to all those trouble makers ??? don't try to make a fool out of me ,plz!!! for heaven sake !!!!!

Quote

sita

@sitakshii

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

how can i forget tht i & rajnish asked u to close the vulgar thread of saccymy aba but again u gave ur precahings ,so ultimately i hv to seek yummys help & finally she closed it !!!!

i don't think so u hv ever trashed any thread ,tell me the title of tht thread , of any godisone,sitalakshmi ,musicalaishwarya,whose thread u closed,i even told yummys tht akhl never closes any thread ,if u hv any doubts ask yummys & every time we hv to send pm's to yummys for closing the threads !!!!!

Quote

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

Originally posted by: sita11
how can i forget tht i & rajnish asked u to close the vulgar thread of saccymy aba but again u gave ur precahings ,so ultimately i hv to seek yummys help & finally she closed it !!!! [/quote]

Please read the last post in the thread created by Saccy_mybaba. It will be obvious that I closed that thread.

[quote=sita11]i don't think so u hv ever trashed any thread ,tell me the title of tht thread , of any godisone,sitalakshmi ,musicalaishwarya,whose thread u closed,i even told yummys tht akhl never closes any thread ,if u hv any doubts ask yummys & every time we hv to send pm's to yummys for closing the threads !!!!!

I am not trying to take any credit. Sometimes I close and sometimes Yummys. Since you said I am partial in favour of the trouble makers, therefore I gave example as to how I am not. I may be wrong, but so far I know, whenever Yummys closes a thread, she always writes in the last post that she is closing. I sometimes write and sometimes close without writing any such thing.

So it is wrong to say that I never close threads. I do. I have even trashed some posts. I cannot give links to those because the posts have already been trashed.

However, I agree that I very rarely close threads. But whenever I close or allow threads, I always keep in mind not to be partial. You are pointing towards threads in which new Ramayan was called worse than old. But why are you ignoring the threads in which old Ramayan was called worse than new? If I allowed one, I allowed the other too.

Quote

Shruti

@Shruti11

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 16 years ago

hey guys sita di wat happen dont say such things u and akhl both r the part of this ramayan forum di never say goodbye i dont know wat is happening these days on forum but di aap to ram bhakt ho aur ram bhakt ram ko chord kar kahi nahi jata so di cheerup and dont say about leaving this forum

Quote

sita

@sitakshii

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

see i am in my college right now, i am not allowed to use internet from my college ,so i am using it from the cafe ,nearby my college

akhl saccymy babas all threads were closed by yummys only ,becaz everytime i send 2-2 pm's to yummys abt tht vulgar thread,yummys assured me tht she has closed those vulgar threads,if u think i am lying u r welcomed to ask yummys abt it openly on the forum ,let me tell u tht even yummys also sometimes donot write when she closes the thread ,but i am really shocked tht u wrote quite a lot for me wen u closed the thread of sitalakshmi & nevergav esuch preachings to any of those troblemakers !!!

Quote

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#10

Please read the first line of the first post of the following thread:-
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/ramayan/1049731/real-truth-of-sugriva-and-vibhishana

Saccy_mybaba has started that thread with "TRUTH IS TRUTH AND ,YOU PEOPLE LOCKED MY POST".
What does it mean? It means that before this thread, Saccy_mybaba started another thread. That thread was closed by Yummys - not me - I agree to this. But if you read the last post of the thread whose link I gave above, then you will find that I did close this particular thread.

I agree that in that thread, I did write the following:-
"The topic starter has the right to share his/her opinion so long it follows IF's code of conduct. Therefore, I will observe the progress of the thread to see how it is proceeding."

I do not understand why it is wrong to allow a thread if it is within IF's code of conduct?

In the same thread, you made the following post:-
",we all gave our proofs to this memebr earlier also in the thread which he made on the same topic ,which was closed by yummys !!!"

This means that the member had made an earlier post and that earlier post was closed by Yummys.

As I wrote in that thread, I promised that if the posts became offensive, then I would close the thread. If you read the last post in that thread, you will find that I did keep my promise. So Saccy_mybaba made two posts - Yummys closed the first one and I closed the second one.

I want to make it clear again that I deserve any credit for locking a thread. Since you said that I never locked any thread, that is why I thought of clarifying - that is all.

In a PM to me, you wrote that I should close a thread because it was bashing some of the the new casts.

I made the following reply:-

"As a member, I like Debina more. But, as a viewbie, I must be impartial. I feel that neither Deepika nor Debina should be bashed because if Debina is based, then Debina's fans will feel that they have the right to bash Deepika. And if Deepika is bashed, then Deepika's fans will feel that they have the right to bash Debina. "

Isn't what I wrote justified?

In your reply to my PM, you wrote:-

"EVEN I ALSO LIKE deepika"

This means that at that time, you also found the content of my PM as justified.

I agree with you fully that I very rarely close threads (but it is wrong to say that I never close). Now, why is it that I rarely close threads? The reasons are the following:-

I am a viewbie, not a mod. Yummys is the mod. Therefore, I do not have as much authority as Yummys has.

I allowed lots of posts in which new casts were called better than old casts. If I had closed the posts having opposite views, do you think it would have been justified?

Earlier there was no rule against comparison. Moreover, comparisons are not against IF's rules. That is why I was allowing comparison posts. But one day, Yummys wrote that comparisons should not be made because it leads to quarrels. This means that Yummys made a rule that comparisons should not be made. Since she is mod of this forum, therefore I abided by that rule. And after that, I also made posts saying that please avoid comparisons.

Quote

1 2 3 4

my message to coolviewbie & goodbye forever !!!!!

Related Topics

Explore Topics