REAL TRUTH OF SUGRIVA AND VIBHISHANA

TRUTH IS TRUTH AND ,YOU PEOPLE LOCKED MY POST BECAUSE I WROTE TRUTH YOU PEOPLE

My advise to you dear go and have a good cheakup of ur mind from your trusted doctor or if you ask i can give u names of some good Psychiatrist oh dear GET WELL SOOOOOON 😛😆😃

hmmmm,

i will read the links..

and i have one very nice links, abt panch - kanya.

and all of them are very respected. there are few reasons for that.

the way u r looking at the thing is wrong.. u have to see the other side too.


i will find the link, and will write it here later.

Originally posted by: Huduga

hmmmm,

i will read the links..

and i have one very nice links, abt panch - kanya.

and all of them are very respected. there are few reasons for that.

the way u r looking at the thing is wrong.. u have to see the other side too.


i will find the link, and will write it here later.

Rajnish and Sita,
The topic starter has the right to share his/her opinion so long it follows IF's code of conduct. Therefore, I will observe the progress of the thread to see how it is proceeding.

Saccy_mybaba,
Please do not use so many of capitalizations. It is not good. Use it only sparingly and that too when some particular word or phrase is really to be highlighted.

To all those who want to participate in this discussion: -
Please read the posts in this thread. Go through the links and then share your opinions without going off-track.

I will go thru the links to see if posting those links violates IF's code. If yes, I will delete this thread. Otherwise, I will let it continue.

Let him tell whatever he wants to say. as long as he is in the limits,

i wud have liked if he wud have structured his post in a better way.
If he is here to learn, and willing to listen to us too, then it is great.

Bcoz many other ppl raises such type of questions, and we shud try to show them our side of arguments too.

Saccy,
i have tulsidaas's ramcharitmanas.
Vaalmiki's ramayan i don't have.

maybe this topic will get locked.
bcoz ur way of writing is kind of attacking n criticising type.
there are so many books, so many sites,
difficult to find which is wrong, which is right.

but my intention is to learn nice things out of it.
if we want to criticise , we can find thousands.
but we dont grow by that.

if u want to open new topic in future, / or with another ID.

please use nice language, nice formatting.
and be like a friend :-)

if u r here to learn and explore.
as all of us are here.
then u r most welcome.
😊

sita11.

yeah u r right.
i won't discuss this matter with him.

if he talks this way.
------
Saccy,
please edit ur post. and talk in a nice manner.
be a friend :-)

Saccy_mybaba,
Here is my analysis of your post. You have written as if you are ordering us by shouting at us. That is a bad thing to do.

[quote]TRUTH IS TRUTH AND ,YOU PEOPLE LOCKED MY POST BECAUSE I WROTE TRUTH [/quote]
What you think as truth may or may not be truth. Irrespective of that, no thread is locked for containing truth.

[quote]YOU PEOPLE THINK THAT EACH CHARACTER IS SIMIRAL TO SHOWN IN SERIAL[/quote]
Wrong again. There have been posts written by members here that some of things shown in the serial are different from what they have read in scriptures.

[quote] AND ALL THOSE LINKS I AM GIVING BELOW ARE FROM VALMIKI RAMAYANA AND SHRI RAM CHARITMANAS(THE VERY FIRST ONE)
SO THEY ARE VERY VERY ACCURATE[/quote]
You are saying that your belief is as per Valmiki Ramayan and Ramacharitmanas. There are members who have opposing view and they also claim that their views are as per Valmiki Ramayan. Therefore, I will not side with either one as of now. I will study your points in detail and then get back.

[quote]AND MIND THAT VALMIKI RAMAYANA IS THE MOST ACCURATE AND FIRST VERSION OF RAMAYANA WHICH VALMIKI JI WROTE WHILE MEDITATING AND SEEING EACH AND EVERY EVENTWITH DIVINE VISION LIKE SANJAY OF MAHABHARATA.[/quote]
Most of members here agree with this. Therefore, there was no need to use all caps and large font.

[quote]AND KAMABN RAMYANA IS VERY VERY IN ACCURATE[/quote]
Again, many members here agree that Kamban Ramayan is less accurate than Valmiki Ramayan. Therefore, there was no need of all caps and large font.

[quote]AS KAMBAN CHANGED FACTS OF SUFRIVA MARRIAGE WITH TARA ALONG WITH SUGRIVA SEX RELATIONS WITH HER AND MARRIAGE OF MANDDARI AND VIBHISHANA. I SAID BEFORE THAT SUGRIVA MARRIED HIS SISTER IN LAW AFTER THE DEATH OF VALI,VALI NEVER ADVICED HIMTO MARRY TARA AND HAD SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH TARA FOR CONTINOUS 4 MOTHS OF RAINY SEASON.[/quote]
Please do not use so explicit language unless really needed.

[quote]HE WASA DEGRADED LOW PERSON.[/quote]
There are different gradations of being low or high. Things are rarely completely black or while. They are mostly different shades of gray.

[quote]AND MANDODARI DID MARRIED VIBHISHANA AFTER THE DEATH OF RAVANA THIS IS THE TRUTH AND I HAVE MY POINTS AND LINKS BY FAMOUS HISTORIANS AND SOCIOLOGISTS TO PROVE THIS.[/quote]
It is good provided you really have proof.

[quote]AND KAMBAN RAMAYAN IS NOT THE ACCURATE VERSION OF RAMAYAN KAMABN CHANGED MANY MANY FACTS OF RAMAYANA TO SHOW THESE LOW PEOPLE AS GOOD PEOPLE, VALMIKI RAMAYANA AND RAMCHARITMANAS ARE CURRECT VERSION OF RAMAYANA[/quote]
It is not good to repeat the same thing and that too in the same post.