Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Eternal Love CC # 9 - Page 115

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Actually Samba's character is annoying in SB. It has always being a matter of confusion to me that although they made all the relatives of Krishna so much holier than though, bathed with milk, Samb was still left like an idiot absolutely no efforts to hide his ill nature. I wonder what could be the cause of it

Swastika rk looks like pathetic and Samba was ultimate fool.. Jambavathi no less..Krishna doesn't consider jambavathi at all.. Jambavathi heard only in bhagvatam.

Originally posted by: Sweetypie34

Swastika rk looks like pathetic and Samba was ultimate fool.. Jambavathi no less..Krishna doesn't consider jambavathi at all.. Jambavathi heard only in bhagvatam.

Excluding Satyabhama, Jamvanti was the only wife of Krishna who had any importance in his life

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Excluding Satyabhama, Jamvanti was the only wife of Krishna who had any importance in his life

But it's a fact Krishna didn't listen to Jambavati, at all. He wouldn't rescue Samba from Kauravas. Balram had to go.

Of all the characterizations, Jambavati and Satyabhama come closest to text. Rukmini was flowerpot in text, flowerpot here. So yeah, I'd say it fits.

The characterizations which don't fit are RK. Krishna truly comes across as an insufferable egomaniac with a control problem and a wide streak of misogyny.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

But it's a fact Krishna didn't listen to Jambavati, at all. He wouldn't rescue Samba from Kauravas. Balram had to go.

Of all the characterizations, Jambavati and Satyabhama come closest to text. Rukmini was flowerpot in text, flowerpot here. So yeah, I'd say it fits.

The characterizations which don't fit are RK. Krishna truly comes across as an insufferable egomaniac with a control problem and a wide streak of misogyny.

Krishna didn't follow everything that Jamvanti said doesn't mean he would have completely ignored her or didn't care a bit a bit about her. He didn't rescue Samb probably because Samb's fault wasn't excusable. Abduction of a girl for Marriage is one thing, I mean I know it's bad but they accepted it in their era, but Samb was simply r**ing a girl with no intent of marriage

Coming to Rukmini, they have redeemed the character of Rukmini I guess after feedbacks from audience who consider Rukmini as Lakshmi swaroop and can't take her character disgraced. Else initially her character was that of an over jealous, ultra snobbish and mild arrogant girl. She judged Sudama for his looks and stopped him from entering Dwarika, she started complaining about backpain just because she slept on floor for a night (by the way this is After she was once put in prison by her brother. She was shown to highly jealous of not just Radha but also Satyabhama was shown actually making Krishna swear on her to never speak to Satyabhama

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

But it's a fact Krishna didn't listen to Jambavati, at all. He wouldn't rescue Samba from Kauravas. Balram had to go.

Of all the characterizations, Jambavati and Satyabhama come closest to text. Rukmini was flowerpot in text, flowerpot here. So yeah, I'd say it fits.

The characterizations which don't fit are RK. Krishna truly comes across as an insufferable egomaniac with a control problem and a wide streak of misogyny.

But some text says krishna close only to Rukmini and satyabhama.

Mostly in South one temple krishna Rukmini only ..Rukmini marriage celebrated very grandly

Originally posted by: Sweetypie34

But some text says krishna close only to Rukmini and satyabhama.

Mostly in South one temple krishna Rukmini only ..Rukmini marriage celebrated very grandly

Texts over highlight Rukmini Krishna relation, check the previous pages we have discussed a lot about it.

Satyabhama was obviously most important and was actively (or sometimes passively but in anyway) involved in all the actions of Krishna so obviously can't be ignored.

Rest of wives are ignored because of the same

Originally posted by: Sweetypie34

But some text says krishna close only to Rukmini and satyabhama.

Mostly in South one temple krishna Rukmini only ..Rukmini marriage celebrated very grandly

Point I was trying to make was Rukmini didn't have any active part in Krishna's life the way Satyabhama and Jambavati did. Take Rukmini away, and nothing else changes in Krishna story. Take Jambavati away, some things change. Take Satyabhama away, entirety of it will change.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CIfwwAgH06v/?igshid=rzjrl5jp1bwu

Dwarka submerge promo

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Texts over highlight Rukmini Krishna relation, check the previous pages we have discussed a lot about it.

Satyabhama was obviously most important and was actively (or sometimes passively but in anyway) involved in all the actions of Krishna so obviously can't be ignored.

Rest of wives are ignored because of the same

I mentioned temple in South and from south

Wonderful promo..Dwarka submerged world knows..Submerging how krishna and radha gone alive and krishna saved dwarka..epic insult I say