About interpretations. - Page 9

Created

Last reply

Replies

192

Views

19.2k

Users

11

Likes

663

Frequent Posters

stormborn thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#81

Originally posted by: ReadLo

You're right, except the Americans are logical in what they do!

And then Supernatural in each convention questions about respect for God are often asked.

The director explains what he thinks and apologizes (this is where he keeps the peace!)

For Lucifer, nothing mean to want to make the devil a good devil, after all he was an angel, so the same when it remains logical we accept!

While here nothing makes sense....

Exactly ! When I said I had my own reasons for disliking what's going on RK, those were what I meant.

Firstly Zero character consistency. Krishna seems to suffer from severe amnesia.

Secondly Zero rationality / logic. Enough said !

Thirdly Zero righteousness despite repeatedly claiming themselves as righteous Gods. ( God in spn never claimed to be righteous. The word that describes him mostly is 'indifferent' and the showmakers are pretty consistent about that characterization)

Fourthly none of the western shows ever claimed to teach the world anything. They even made fun of themselves in the meta episodes.

I can go until 100 and none of those has anything to do with my belief system.

Edited by stormborn - 6 years ago
-girlygeek- thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#82

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Don't want to discuss about the Golok and Lord Krishna, for me there is no golok separately, Nand goan itself is golok/ gokul. Lord Vishnu descended from Heaven to earth to punish the sinners and save righteousness.

Red-- Hah ha ha , good observation!

It suddenly struck my mind, please anyone tell me, is there any images pictures, paintings or statues of Gods there at that time? And if ' Yes ' then how those looked like! Just I want to know the concept of God at that time.

As per my knowledge people do murti puja back then.... i watched a movie of Tulsi mata ... it showed she worshiped Lord Vishnus murti....

and for Mahadev there is Shivling ....in that period people do hawan more i guess😕

ReadLo thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#83

Originally posted by: stormborn

Exactly ! When I said I had my own reasons for disliking what's going on RK, those were what I meant.

Firstly Zero character consistency. Krishna seems to suffer from severe amnesia.

Secondly Zero rationality / logic. Enough said !

Thirdly Zero righteousness despite repeatedly claiming themselves as righteous Gods. ( God in spn never claimed to be righteous. The word that describes him mostly is 'indifferent' and the showmakers are pretty consistent about that characterization)

Fourthly none of the western shows ever claimed to teach the world anything. They even made fun of themselves in the meta episodes.

I can go until 100 and none of those has anything to do with my belief system.

Bold: Exactly, because they know that we will know what we want from it in what they show. And they are not lecturers under the pretext that they want to show us something that seems "right" and especially if they are wrong, they will not justify this, they will even listen to the public and learn from it for their next project!

I've never looked at Krishna Vaasi, I've never even tried to understand what Krishna wanted to teach in the show, I only walk on the facts and what I saw was enough to make me understand that everything here is a charade!

You're right, it's zero everywhere, the worst thing for me is that there's no justice! As much as Krishna should have let them live it will be the same with Ayan...!

Anyway, nothing's going to change, but right now I think this lead is even worse than irsha!

Because you're going to have to tell me who Radha has to submit to!

RainFire125 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#84

Let me pose a very logical ques to all.

Most of us are still trying to say that the intent is to show that love is above all, we cannot forget love etc etc ... that this is where the show is heading with the submission blah blah

In this show everything is in human context. So as a human lets say a girl falls in love with someone in her 11th stnd. Very strong connection and we really understand and fall in love. I am not even talking about a lifetime soul connection here. There is a very deep bond and trust. She wants to marry the guy. But again due to unforseen circumstances she could not and was forced to marry someone else who also is a nice guy. Now ofcourse in a day's time she will not forget that love. So logically she will buy time from her husband. If her husband is understanding - very good. If not, what will she do?? can she fight? Can she leave immediately? And even lets say her husband is understanding how long do you think he will tolerate the distance??? Forever?? This does not work in any era, any society people unless the love is above love which is devotion par. It will def end in getting divorced or separated.

The biggest mistake in the liberty that these people took in the show is keeping the human traits live for long. Even if Radha agrees that she loves Krishna, then what??? I am still talking in the human aspect. What will she do by agreeing?? Will she tell Ayan that i am never ever going to let you near me? If you will come near me i will scream or leave? Till how long? How long will Ayan tolerate as a husband?

They have gone into a pit with this marriage track and now this submission thing. Narayan should have been Narayan, Radha at a point should have realized that something is more there in this love. This is not just prem, this is more than prem. Then this marriage fiasco would never have happened, she would have probably refused to marry anyone if she had the spine. Then she would have explored this feeling of hers more and realized that this is nor mere prem ,,, its full surrender by heart and has nothing to do with body or any material thing.

Sutapasima thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#85

Originally posted by: ReadLo

The scene made me laugh....

Another asore, and an arrow that becomes ice....

It gets worse and worse!

That means you guys are still watching the crap ?? 😲😮

-girlygeek- thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#86

Originally posted by: stormborn

Titanic is safe. The iceberg has hit ashrams in Vrindavan.

Hahhahahaahha🤣🤣🤣

RainFire125 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#87

Originally posted by: Sutapasima

That means you guys are still watching the crap ?? 😲😮

LOL ,,,, many are Suta!!! :) curiosity kills the cat you see. I personally stopped.

stormborn thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#88

Originally posted by: Sutapasima

That means you guys are still watching the crap ?? 😲😮

🤣🤣

Since Friday. After they stopped crying. Stopped after the rash-ruining precap.

Sutapasima thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#89

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Don't want to discuss about the Golok and Lord Krishna, for me there is no golok separately, Nand goan itself is golok/ gokul. Lord Vishnu descended from Heaven to earth to punish the sinners and save righteousness.

Red-- Hah ha ha , good observation!

It suddenly struck my mind, please anyone tell me, is there any images pictures, paintings or statues of Gods there at that time? And if ' Yes ' then how those looked like! Just I want to know the concept of God at that time.

I thought we do have this documented in our Epics how Devi Sati created murti of Shivling n performed prayers ..then followed by Devi Parvati who created Shiv ling initially n prayed before serving lord Mahadev himself at Kailash ....

Also Lord Rama created Shiv ling with stone n sand n worshipped him and also later he created Murti of Goddess Durga Devi and prayed to her for seeking blessings n power before yudh with Ravan .

Only references of Lord Shiva n Goddess Durga find mention in the epics ... since The epics are about the Vishnu avatar himself ...

Lord Brahma ...very few worshipped him in Murti form ...

Please do correct me n my baby knowledge

Edited by Sutapasima - 6 years ago
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#90

Originally posted by: ReadLo

I know what you meant.

And I say God because in the series Krishna is God.

In my head the two are well separated. But when it comes to the series, the two are one.

I know that the Krishna shown in the series is not the real Krishna, but there is no denying that he is Krishna in the series, so when I say God, I mean the God in RadhaKrishna and not the Krishna you pray.

Both are not the same. That's difference between just knowing & connecting with the character.

Those who are watching just to know the story will try to understand how & why characters are shown as per story line.

Believers can not connect with RK's krishna. Divinity is missing.

A character can be called God, if one can connect with them Spiritually too. That's the main requirement. If Divinity is missing then that character can not be termed as God.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".