I think I finally got it. RK Krishna and all other characters in RK universe were actually meant to take birth later, during the hippie era. Flower power, make prem not war, that kind of thing.😆
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 25 Aug 2025 EDT
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai August 26, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread- 26th August 2025
ANSHUMAN GONE 25.8
AFTER MATHh. 26.8
A study On Miss Geetanjali Armaan Poddar
Navri - The Hawasi Mistress
Jhanak Written Update And Episode Discussion thread No "124"
IMDB's most beautiful actresses in the world. Kriti & Hania in top 10
A Study on Miss Abhira "Jogan" Sharma
Parineeti Chopra is pregnant
Punishment to kill one or five is same
🇮🇳 Big News for IndiaForums Members! 🇮🇳
Maza nahi aaya😒
Who killed Anshuman; mara kaise ?
Suniel Shetty Looses Cool On Stage
Vicky Kaushal’s Mahavatar postponed to 2027
Bollywood Wants Bootlicker's - Nadiadwala Grandson Sends Legal Notice
Kumkum Bhagya New Season BC ~ Results
Sunita Ahuja Claims Her Son Doing Better Film Than Saiyaara
I think I finally got it. RK Krishna and all other characters in RK universe were actually meant to take birth later, during the hippie era. Flower power, make prem not war, that kind of thing.😆
***SPOILER ALERT***
So Krishna gives Panchali a lecture on standing up for her own rights, then he goes behind her back and sees if Karna is willing to marry her if he wins?
Panchali wanted Arjuna, but if Karna proved willing to see the error in Suyodhana's ways and marry her himself, Krishna would make sure she went to Karna?
What kind of sakhaship is that?
Also, Panchali can't be won by Icha/Desire only by Parakram/Bravery? Would've been all right (fit for the times) if they didn't show the prior scene of Krishna going on about women's right to their own choices. So feminism down the drain when it comes to Karna?
Also, I get what Swastik is trying to do with Aryavarta Barbie... I think. They want to say regular girls can stand up for their rights and become Panchali.
Problem is they're using Krishna to lecture her into it. Why not have her develop a backbone on her own instead of having a male character badger her about it? Let her have her own agency, man! Epic Panchali was a badass woman. Her scenes with Krishna in MBh were fairly equal in power. Please keep her as such.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
***SPOILER ALERT***
So Krishna gives Panchali a lecture on standing up for her own rights, then he goes behind her back and sees if Karna is willing to marry her if he wins?
Panchali wanted Arjuna, but if Karna proved willing to see the error in Suyodhana's ways and marry her himself, Krishna would make sure she went to Karna?
What kind of sakhaship is that?
Also, Panchali can't be won by Icha/Desire only by Parakram/Bravery? Would've been all right (fit for the times) if they didn't show the prior scene of Krishna going on about women's right to their own choices. So feminism down the drain when it comes to Karna?
Also, I get what Swastik is trying to do with Aryavarta Barbie... I think. They want to say regular girls can stand up for their rights and become Panchali.
Problem is they're using Krishna to lecture her into it. Why not have her develop a backbone on her own instead of having a male character badger her about it? Let her have her own agency, man! Epic Panchali was a badass woman. Her scenes with Krishna in MBh were fairly equal in power. Please keep her as such.
hahahahaha women developing a backbone in this show??????????? Have u ever seem that happening before, errrr lets say with Radha???????????? SHe had a backbone only when it came to insulting Krishna again and again in her initial badha tracks. Uske baad she will again be confused and he will confuse her further with his twisted words. You have high expectations my friend :)
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
***SPOILER ALERT***
So Krishna gives Panchali a lecture on standing up for her own rights, then he goes behind her back and sees if Karna is willing to marry her if he wins?
Panchali wanted Arjuna, but if Karna proved willing to see the error in Suyodhana's ways and marry her himself, Krishna would make sure she went to Karna?
What kind of sakhaship is that?
Also, Panchali can't be won by Icha/Desire only by Parakram/Bravery? Would've been all right (fit for the times) if they didn't show the prior scene of Krishna going on about women's right to their own choices. So feminism down the drain when it comes to Karna?
Also, I get what Swastik is trying to do with Aryavarta Barbie... I think. They want to say regular girls can stand up for their rights and become Panchali.
Problem is they're using Krishna to lecture her into it. Why not have her develop a backbone on her own instead of having a male character badger her about it? Let her have her own agency, man! Epic Panchali was a badass woman. Her scenes with Krishna in MBh were fairly equal in power. Please keep her as such.
OHHHH, u dont know????????? The great lord is giving a chance for Karna to become righteous and change sides you see
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
***SPOILER ALERT***
So Krishna gives Panchali a lecture on standing up for her own rights, then he goes behind her back and sees if Karna is willing to marry her if he wins?
Panchali wanted Arjuna, but if Karna proved willing to see the error in Suyodhana's ways and marry her himself, Krishna would make sure she went to Karna?
What kind of sakhaship is that?
Also, Panchali can't be won by Icha/Desire only by Parakram/Bravery? Would've been all right (fit for the times) if they didn't show the prior scene of Krishna going on about women's right to their own choices. So feminism down the drain when it comes to Karna?
Also, I get what Swastik is trying to do with Aryavarta Barbie... I think. They want to say regular girls can stand up for their rights and become Panchali.
Problem is they're using Krishna to lecture her into it. Why not have her develop a backbone on her own instead of having a male character badger her about it? Let her have her own agency, man! Epic Panchali was a badass woman. Her scenes with Krishna in MBh were fairly equal in power. Please keep her as such.
Why is RK s krishna forcing he who should not be named on panchali and us. I am not liking him at this very moment at all
I want RK s panchali to shut RK s krishna up and pack him away with his new sakha.
So neither Krishna nor Karn cared to mention that Draupadi is a human and not a sack of potatoes to win in a mela and hand over to another person.
Waise doesn't it defy the main rule of sayamvar ?
They are talking like it's perfectly normal !!
Why does Shakuni walk like a disabled person and Dhritarashtra walks like a supermodel on a ramp ?
I don't get RK scene today.
Does Radha know Krishna is Narayan or what ?
I am having a scary intuition. Looks like they have restarted the vadha tracks and this time with Draupadi.
Radha's first vadha was bhay.
In that track, Krishna's whole purpose was to make Radha understand that women have the right to choose their partners and not their parents. He even persuaded Radha to talk to her father about it. Radha finally realised that through Sudevi's wedding.
Krishna is doing the same with Draupadi----lecturing about realising her rights and speaking up about it to her father.
This is the same as the bhay track.
Now probably the next will be moh after she marries the brothers or may be it won't be in the previous order.
It's definitely going to be irsha after Arjun marries Subhadra.
Now I have an even scarier thought--
Vastraharan will be the start of the anger track.
And the whole kurukshetra war will happen to make her realise why anger is bad and only prem is the ultimate answer.
Then she might have some identity crisis just like Radha. But by then Krishna will forget about her entirely and get back to barsana to be with Radha.