Telly Tadka-Tale of Brittle Bones-QH - Page 4

Originally posted by: -oyehoyye-

May be TeeTee walo wants 'LOWEE ISHTORY' in QH which will make in Different 😊 tch tch 'Creative PH' no understands this simple thing😒

Originally posted by: -oyehoyye-

May be TeeTee walo wants 'LOWEE ISHTORY' in QH which will make in Different 😊 tch tch 'Creative PH' no understands this simple thing😒

Originally posted by: sona_Barun

Hi my name is Sona...I am new year...i just took to watching 4 Lions shows...GHSP, IPK, SG and QH as i think the PH is quite creative...i have been reading through some of the posts and the comments in this one caught my attention...especially the ones by @VictoriaHot and @magicbeans.

Well here is what i think...and i'd be glad if you guys gave my POV a glance...

In TV Series making, Movie making the most important factor is "STORY TELLING" its "VITAL" and there is a phrase that goes with Storytelling "Its not what you so, its How you show, that matters" which is exactly the fault here...I know this for the simple fact that i have been around here for quite sometime and know the ropes...If you are not a master storyteller or for that matter if you are not a good storyteller then no matter how hard you try, your show will never click.

QH is a good show, but will wear off soon, and you don't have to trust me if you don't want to you'll realize that in a couple of more episodes if the makers don't bring a stronger sense of reasoning to back the actions.

I know the bringing of another character from another show does not go with IF's protocol but am going to take a leap to try and make you understand why showcasing even a glimpse of the Backstory is important. In IPK the character essayed by Barun, "Arnav" in the starting episodes comes across as ruthless, arogant, selfish bas**** . It was as though he was walking right on the path between positive and negative...It was a matter of fine line and he could be the first negative male lead on Television but what the makers did here was they gave a backstory to Arnav, because of which the viewers no matter what got a chance to understand why Arnav was bitter...Why he was the way he was...but still they did not know the entire story, just bits here and there, when Arnav or his sister Anjali talked about it, was reminded of it etc...

Here in QH everybody know something happened 17 Years back, but that's not the backstory, the reason backing it is what is the actual backstory.

The writer of TT clearly mentions " That if showing Rashid Khan the way he is a deliberate action, the makers should at least keep the viewers in the loop and give them a glimpse into the backstory", keyword being "GLIMPSE"

Rashid has a majboori but can you relate with him? "NO" why??? because we have no proof to back him up...or lest feel for the guy...


I know everybody is entitled to have their opinion but what's glaringly there onscreen one cannot ignore can they?

Originally posted by: -oyehoyye-

Here some people write articles on a show by not not watching the show properly or just 'bumping' into one episode ;)

i really donno what should i say something good about such article🤓