Originally posted by: ssrbaqri
The more this 'Sajjan's son theory' drags on, the more it establishes that not many members in this forum know the basics of Indian caste system. 'Singh' signifies nothing ... it is commonly used by Yadavs as a middle name while Thakurs use it either as a surname or as middle name (to be followed by Chauhan, Rathore etc). So, if ASY is using Yadav as his surname there is absolutely no chance he can be related to thakurs. And if he is an illegitimate son of SS, WTH he would be named 'A.S. Yadav' instead of 'Thakur A.S.'?
So frndz, plz stop speculating that our seedha sadha SS committed such a sin in the past. No way, whatsoever. Had there been no Ganga...the girl he really wanted to move over...amma could hv boasted of being married to a one-woman-man. Lol.