SHAME ON YOU, KRISHNA!! - Page 4

Originally posted by: Seetal

Krishna made me sick today. Not only did he just sit there and listen to all the venom about his wife, but he continued eating with the source of the venom. Khaana kaise hajam hua yaar? He has a mouth on him that lately has done nothing but blabber nonsense. Pratigya please give Arushi the luxury of crawling around in her own hell. Arushi will never come to her senses as long as you are "watching" over your "preciousssss".

Originally posted by: dhakarn

i wrote my post as seen from krishna's point of view...........but diagree with u on leaving ur in-laws house without atleast informing them, i mean informing them, not asking permission................let me just ask u a question ------- would any indian women leave their sasuraal without even informing their in-laws..........would they just go out and let them wonder where she has gone when they not find her in the house..........
would any indian women however progressive they might be step out of their in-laws house house without telling them u r going out when they r in the house.......... there is something called manners..........just bec the person in front of u don't care about any damn of u, would u refrain from doing ur due or duty.................

Originally posted by: dhakarn

i wrote my post as seen from krishna's point of view...........but diagree with u on leaving ur in-laws house without atleast informing them, i mean informing them, not asking permission................let me just ask u a question ------- would any indian women leave their sasuraal without even informing their in-laws..........would they just go out and let them wonder where she has gone when they not find her in the house..........
would any indian women however progressive they might be step out of their in-laws house house without telling them u r going out when they r in the house.......... there is something called manners..........just bec the person in front of u don't care about any damn of u, would u refrain from doing ur due or duty.................

Originally posted by: Dyehard

If that 'Indian' woman had murderers for in-laws then yes she would.
She informed her husband as she always does. Why should she tell the whole family? So that they can stop her and then she has to put up a big fight about that too? as if she cares and krishna too.........its just a matter of courtesy, nothing else.....if u remember prof keeps reminding us that his daughter pratigya is the epitome of all sanskaars and manners and courtesies...........if she is eating , drinking, sleeping with their money , then she should do it, if at all she can't do it as her position as DIL of them...... And we can accuse her of not having tact and fighting about every little thing? We will damn her for everything won't we, if Krishna's precious smile slips by even a notch? How fair-minded we are! dear dye, i think u r again misunderstanding me.........its not that krishna is smiling or not, i just explained krishna's point of view...........
Anyway, this is precisely the kind of ploy used by people like SS and Amma all over the country to try and subjugate the women in their society. We may be criminals but you are a 'loose woman' because you don't have respect. We the people of this forum don't need to add to their might and create more Kesars.

just bec the person in front of u don't care about any damn of u, would u refrain from doing ur due or duty.................
I agree, but we should be telling Krishna this! Just becasue keasr and Aarishi don't appreciate Pratigya's help she can't very well say then go to hell! But if she steps out of a house where people, far far fro, worrying only use this opportunity to abuse and poison her husband, I don;t think it is anything but natural. Let us not try and bash the last vestige of spirit from pratigya, we must then succed in really have a show in which Aarushi or Kesar is the protagonist. krishna's chratcter is presented in such a way...........but when have ever been pratigya been presented in such a way.........she is always been presented as a sanskaari beti and bahu..........or is it optional........she is point blankly refusing to see that her sister willingly walked into the mess, but she is blaming everyone but her........and in the process ruining kesar's life.........and i am not bashing pratigya here, it was grossly out of character behavior from pratigya going out of her sasuraal when there is no emergency without informing her in-laws other than her husband.........

Originally posted by: shy2729

I would like to repeat what I have stated in few of my earlier posts. Kriya are yet to fall totally in love with each other. This constant attempt to please each other so that nothing goes wrong with the relation is called making adjustments not being head over heels in love. K vociferously defends his POV when his love for P is challenged. However when P's POV is in dispute, a lot many times he has stayed quiet because he himself cannot comprehend it. How can we defend what we don't believe in. Such glaring mental incompatibily is bound to cause rift in the relationship. The CVs cld. have tackled this prob. w'out bringing in Arushu.

What happened to the marital rape track and why was P suddenly in the green house?

Originally posted by: shy2729

Dye, Why blame Krishna for being hi mself? No merely blaming him for not allowing P to be like herself.😃 He has no right to do that, nai?

This time or every other time it's P who fails to call a spade a spade regarding K's behaviour and his shortcomings. In fact, P was quite vocal about K's faults before the consummation of their marriage. That used to irritate me but was more realistic. Now P has taken to avoid dealing with her relationship with K or his drawbacks.

If you notice, P never shows people their faults very much, unless pushed to the very brink of her tolerance. She does not disdain Kesar's cowardice, in spite of being so gutsy herself, she does not blame Krishna's obtuseness in spite of being so clear-headed herself. She gave K a very long rope after the Angad fiasco before she burst out at him. So she does tend to make a LOT of allowance for people. She is not judgmental about personalities as much as she is about larger rights and injustice.

It could be that K or the the status of Kriya's married life is quite low on her list of priorities.If k now decides to act difficult, may be we will then see P focussing her attention to her own life. That would be a welcome shift from this Arushi saga. A spat here or a rift there does not or should not imply breakup.

Frankly, at this point Kriya is very low on MY priority. First let P get back her voice and her gumption and let K acquire a spine and some 'gairat' (self-respect) then I may find some sense to their continued 'marriage'.

I am waiting for the day when p gathers the courage (more a matter of having the heart or ruthlessness!)to say,"shame on, Krishna!" Believe u me, that's when the real show will begin!

Originally posted by: dhakarn

if krishna is to be blamed, then what about pratigya...........did she behave like a sanskaari bahu in the yesterday's episode...........no , not at all.................whatever the nature of her in-laws be it is her duty to go out of their house after asking their permission or even informing them................she didn't show slightest sanskaar and culture she is so busy upholding................ and amma pointed out all the right things about pratigya.............she never tried to be one of them, she was never a family member there.............krishna tries so hard to get the approval of sucksenas even though they insults him every time, but pratigya never tried to be among them, all she does is keep on disobeying them and their rules(this is what krishna will think)......................this is what every MIL and FIL will feel.............(lets forget amma and SS r faking) but to krishna's eyes this is the truth..............so no wonder he is getting angry.............and just look at the way she talked when she came back from her home..........as if nobody else exists in the world.............she just asked 'did u eat? ' as a mere formality and without waiting for an answer proceeded with her rantings..............if she has any concern for him she shouldn't have behaved like that..................she knows his nature, then why is she playing ignorant.................