SHAME ON YOU, KRISHNA!! - Page 3

Originally posted by: anusarkar

Truely spoken.

Anu

Originally posted by: Habeeba_d

He should start doing some type of work man, till when your going to be a useless guy doing avaragardi with friends. He doesnt do any type of work but has the ego of a superstar.

Originally posted by: anusarkar

[

I believe that the reason K kept quiet during the entire taunting session was that there was nothing factually wrong with whatever the Thakurs were saying. He was showing his discomfiture by trying to get up but verbally I think he had nothing to speak. Tell me honestly, do you truly believe the charges made against P (from their perspective)were all unfounded?

Originally posted by: dhakarn

if krishna is to be blamed, then what about pratigya...........did she behave like a sanskaari bahu in the yesterday's episode...........no , not at all.................whatever the nature of her in-laws be it is her duty to go out of their house after asking their permission or even informing them................she didn't show slightest sanskaar and culture she is so busy upholding................ and amma pointed out all the right things about pratigya.............she never tried to be one of them, she was never a family member there.............krishna tries so hard to get the approval of sucksenas even though they insults him every time, but pratigya never tried to be among them, all she does is keep on disobeying them and their rules(this is what krishna will think)......................this is what every MIL and FIL will feel.............(lets forget amma and SS r faking) but to krishna's eyes this is the truth..............so no wonder he is getting angry.............and just look at the way she talked when she came back from her home..........as if nobody else exists in the world.............she just asked 'did u eat? ' as a mere formality and without waiting for an answer proceeded with her rantings..............if she has any concern for him she shouldn't have behaved like that..................she knows his nature, then why is she playing ignorant.................

• That a woman is a wife first and a human being later and that she has to put her husbands comfort first andher duty towards all other human beings later, however urgent or dire their need maybe
  
• That a woman needs to ask for permission before leaving the house
• That a woman cannot behave with people as they deserve but must subjugate all her moral judgment if those people belong to her sasural - ie if your parents-in law are murderers it does not matter you must still try to get into their good books and sit around with them and make every effort to win their goodwill even by scrificing all your values
  
• That trying to please your husband and his family even when they are cruel, criminal and morally corrupt is your duty and a woman does not have a right to exercise her higher moral, human and civic duty because she runs the risk of inconveniencing her husband who may like to demand her time 24/7.
• That sanskaars are about how 'obedient' you are, how much you hover around your husband and MIL, that you wear a pallu over your head. That you never ask questions. That you sever all ties with your former life ie you make yourself helpless and friendless in case of need, which puts you firmly in the mercy of your inlaws but you do this because otherwise your husband will resent you and become sad.

Originally posted by: Dyehard

I know that people have diverse opinions however surprising they may be in a post-feminist era. I have highlighted some of the things said in the above post and added a few points. If these are really the things some of you believe -

• That a woman is a wife first and a human being later and that she has to put her husbands comfort first andher duty towards all other human beings later, however urgent or dire their need maybe
  
• That a woman needs to ask for permission before leaving the house
• That a woman cannot behave with people as they deserve but must subjugate all her moral judgment if those people belong to her sasural - ie if your parents-in law are murderers it does not matter you must still try to get into their good books and sit around with them and make every effort to win their goodwill even by scrificing all your values
  
• That trying to please your husband and his family even when they are cruel, criminal and morally corrupt is your duty and a woman does not have a right to exercise her higher moral, human and civic duty because she runs the risk of inconveniencing her husband who may like to demand her time 24/7.
• That sanskaars are about how 'obedient' you are, how much you hover around your husband and MIL, that you wear a pallu over your head. That you never ask questions. That you sever all ties with your former life ie you make yourself helpless and friendless in case of need, which puts you firmly in the mercy of your inlaws but you do this because otherwise your husband will resent you and become sad.

did mu post give u these ideas.................i don't know but i meant none of it😊 seriously i am at a loss how u fathomed that i believe in such things.............when i specifically wrote this as the thoughts in the mind of krishna........


If some of you still believe all this then you must look to Kesar and Aarushi to find perfect protagonists of your choice. They are the people who represent the type of womanhood you glorify. Amma too speaks of just such a woman.

But I must say, that however much of a regressive phase this serial is going through, at its core the show DOES NOT believe the above things but the OPPOSITE!

The show believes-
- That a woman is as much entitled to courtesy as a man.

- A woman has a right to an opinion, independent of her husband

- A woman has a right to feelings, beliefs, medical help, an environment of respect and non-abuse. And a woman has a right to expect this and fight for this

- That a woman has the right to relate with people as per the voice of her heart, morals and judgment and not as per the dictates of society. ie if she finds that her MIL is a murderess she may serve her food but reserves the right to not respect her in her heart.

- A woman is not a prisoner and does not need the "permission' of every person in the house to step out of the house. Informing for the sake of safety and courtesy is more than enough

- A WOMAN HAS A MIND AND A RIGHT TO HER MORAL VALUES AND THE RIGHT TO EXERCISE HER MORAL JUDGMENT

- For some women (as should be for all human beings, but is unfortunately not the case!) human values are ABOVE personal RELATIONSHIPS.

- Sometimes doing what is right is more important that the relatively petty concern of domestic bliss and keeping your OWN LITTLE BOAT from rocking.

-A woman has a right to expect a partner to be her mental and moral equal. If he is not and if he is unwilling to walk with her in the most important matters, she has the right to leave him behind however much anguish it may cause her.

yes, the show believes in these things............but not compromising on the basic rules of behavior and manners and again why r u fathoming that i want pratigya to give them respect more than they deserve.........what i am talking is just mere courtesy to another human being especially if they r the masters of the house u r coming and going in, sleeping, eating and ofcourse working.......... but then u completely missed my point.......my post mostly revolves around krishna's point of view..........but u seem to have fathomed that its i who believe in such things as women is always slave and all other stuff