Pratigya should give Krishna a strong message. - Page 2

Originally posted by: shumi.

wahi thobehoodi😛

Originally posted by: steffroc

Originally posted by: shumi.

wahi thobehoodi😛

Originally posted by: aleena1

[ .

hmmm Mrs mathur.. chal hut mrs pinky kahin ki 🤣 🤣 🤣.....so u opt for them to get divorced... why not both will live in peace na 😉😆😆😆....... kya be behoodi.... trying to break up couples....😆😆 no be look i am trying to fit u with mr pinky 🤣 🤣 🤣

Originally posted by: steffroc

@ aleena and u r not less. hidden behoodi 🤣 🤣 🤣

Originally posted by: steffroc

i think prats should leave krishna

bas baat khatam

roz ki kich kich se better hai they both get divorced 😆😆

oh i see krishna doesnt love her. he just drank his moms feet water because it was delicious 🤣 🤣 🤣

she shall go to nitin uncle he was the best for her

Originally posted by: aleena1

.

😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

Pinky has a long way to go........😆😆😆

Whats all this abt uneducated..... illiterates stuff that u wrote on shummis post????😆😆 funny

Originally posted by: pragati.tankha

SAHI BAAT,in krishna's style baat khatam🤣🤣

roz ki kich kich sasur dimag karab hu gawa hai

Originally posted by: anusarkar

Pratigya should not forgive Krishna . I am repeatedly saying I work with women in this situation, this is the first sign of abuse ,and you must leave. The fact that he raised his hands to hit her is enough to be a reason to walk out.

Love is an important part in marraige. but is this really krishna's love ? Till now Krishna's actions has proved that he has loved Prats in his terms. Real love would be if he had confessed that he is the one to pressured Prats to lie about the pregnancy,instead what did he do he slapped her.

Is that love ? NO. Love would be if he did not let his wife wash his mother's feet. he stood there and watched . IT IS NOT LOVE. Lastly it would be love if he would stood by her fighting for Kesar's cause. HE DID NOT. he helped his sister komal in withdrawing the case. IS THIS REALLY LOVE? DEFINITELY NOT.

"To love is to suffer. To avoid suffering one must not love. But then one suffers from not loving. Therefore to love is to suffer, not to love is to suffer. To suffer is to suffer. To be happy is to love. To be happy then is to suffer. But suffering makes one unhappy. Therefore, to be unhappy one must love, or love to suffer, or suffer from too much happiness. I hope you're getting this down."
- Woody Allen,

if love is to suffer. Who is suffering ? Its prats who is suffering constantly in his house ,not Krishna.

"Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing." - Goethe .ENOUGH IS ENOUGH . PRATS PLEASE WALK OUT. LET HIM UNDERSTAND YOUR WORTH, OTHERWISE HE WILL NEVER LEARN.