Prats thought Krishna kidnapped her. Yet she married him to defend her family's izzat in society.
Prats told Krishna she hated him and will for the rest of her life on SR#1.
She told him she would never let him touch her.
She said his so called love was delusional and selfish.
She continued to live with him in close quarters and got to know him gradually over a period of time.
At Shamu's house before she slapped him a second time Angad told her he made a mistake letting her go free without touching her the night of the kidnapping, but will take his revenge with Arushi.
In all this time between the kidnapping and finding out Krishna was not the kidnapper it is understandable she would give him hell in return. I question her sanity in choosing to marry him but that's a whole different story and the POPs took the story this way to prolong the drama.
Once she got to know Krishna better at the Adda when he poured his feelings out and knew he was innocent of her kidnapping did she ever once doubt or question how such a man could have kidnapped her? Did she never think to ask him why he pareshaaned her family in diff. ways before the wedding even as a matter of convo. when she brought up the friendship angle? Even then she kept saying she had work to do in the house.
She gave her vachan to her father knowing fully well she was making a wrong choice by hiding a big secret from Krishna. Why did she fail to be the symbol of truth at that time? (as the creative head of the show said in a recent article). Prolong the drama, of course.😛
Between the time she knew the truth and outing the secret in public why was she still behaving the same way with Krishna as she did before? Why did she flee after pushing him away when he hugged her in the kitchen? She knew he was innocent by then. Knowing the truth didn't make any difference to her. Why couldn't she treat him with some consideration once she knew the truth? Did she need to publicly out the secret before she felt him worthy of some attention from her? Somehow her behavior doesn't make sense.
In all the time he has repeatedly supported and defended her to his family did she ever see him as someone who loved her? It was only after he was devastated hearing the secret in court and cleaning her coal face painting that it even seemed to register with her that there was something real on his part, by then he didn't want anything from her (as he said it) . Was it her guilt that she had hid the secret from him? Was it relief that he accepted her even after hearing the secret and defended her to his family? Seems she may have been projecting a bit much when she called him (his love) delusional and selfish earlier on.
Is it grief at being responsible for his devastation and guilt for not telling him the truth earlier the reasons for her recent concern for him? I wouldn't call it love or anywhere close to it just yet bec' it is conditional on appeasing her own feelings of grief and guilt and trying to get him out of his depressed state knowing she was partially responsible for it.
Ka kehti ho? Bolbo!