pratigya was wrong - Page 5

Originally posted by: CanadianAddict

i think you meant 'lets say i am not looking at this from a civils rights perspective.' Because i am sure even you support civil rights, hence you have them and won't give them up, im assuming?

yes that's wat i meant, but i can tell u one thing no concept including civil rights stay constant at a time slapping might not be considered as a disobedience towards the civil rights

Originally posted by: ___fanaa4u___

i think u wud've felt differently if pratigya wud've slapped krishna! i dun think it is ethical to let out such private information in front of relatives either!

forget about relatives not even in front of our parents...

Umm sorry I didn't get what you were saying, since it movements in the 60s they have been pretty constant.

Originally posted by: ___fanaa4u___

that makes no sense, how is leting how out private info a woman's right?? did krishna advertise it to the whole world that prats does not want to sleep wid him??

yaar i agree with you😃...it was my sarcasm😉

Originally posted by: CanadianAddict

Umm sorry I didn't get what you were saying, since it movements in the 60s they have been pretty constant.

ok look this is no discussion on civil rights r u saying that the concept hasn't changed since then?? pratigya by lettng out this private info has also disrepected civil rights---as civil rights believes in protection of one's freedom and rights--hence prats leaving out such info disrespects krishna's privacy, and as a result is in a way disrespecting civil rights

Originally posted by: shumi.

yaar i agree with you😃...it was my sarcasm😉

lol sorry

Originally posted by: vishid

Well said !! 👏 👏

sorry i am missing something here, when has pratigya used her education that she is better than the takurs, i have heard that from kesar mouth, ammas, ss arushi shyam dadi .....

Originally posted by: ___fanaa4u___

ok look this is no discussion on civil rights r u saying that the concept hasn't changed since then?? pratigya by lettng out this private info has also disrepected civil rights---as civil rights believes in protection of one's freedom and rights--hence prats leaving out such info disrespects krishna's privacy, and as a result is in a way disrespecting civil rights

Okay, dont get all tense like I said. That is a totally different concept, its called defamation of character, which she has not done, she has not even lied- which we could say she did and therefore defamation, she merely stated the truth- which is they don't have an intimate bond. In the end its her civil right of expression, which she used and got slapped that is in question. No the basics have not changed but more have been added on. Neways, its okay, nvm.

Originally posted by: CanadianAddict

Okay, dont get all tense like I said. That is a totally different concept, its called defamation of character, which she has not done, she has not even lied- which we could say she did and therefore defamation, she merely stated the truth- which is they don't have an intimate bond. In the end its her civil right of expression, which she used and got slapped that is in question. No the basics have not changed but more have been added on. Neways, its okay, nvm.

ok here it goes: yes i have no understanding of this concept, u wanna feel very smart because of that--good for u! next did the topic mention how prats wentb against civil rights?? no this was a simple discussion about prats being wrong to let out private info---without making civil rights the main issue, now third i know that in this dumb show kasturie kasturie has slapped robbie many times but i dun think u wud've felt too strongly about it for obvious reasons! no more on this, this is not a civils right topic!