POORA KA POORA KHANDAAN BEHOODA!! - Page 2

Originally posted by: Ananya-kgp

Yeh Saxena khandan ka har ek member behooda hain.....Krishna ne itni taqleef ki, sirf izz liye ki woh Pratigya ki ghar ki izzat ko apni izzat samajta hain, lekin Arushi....Kya kehti hain woh ki Krishnapni tarah kissi ko dhoondega??

Itni achchi kismat nahin hain uski, sabki nahin hoti, uske kismat mein Shakti yaa Angad ya phir koi aur inke type ka hain, mark my words!!!!

Ab Krishna itna lada, phir ghar jaayega, toh woh pagli poochegi "Kya zarrorat thi, yeh sab karne ki??" Nautanki!!!! Accha hota, Krishna kuch nahin karta toh Angad kya Arushi ko chod deta??? Agar mere class ka koi ladka bhi mujhe kissi gunde se bacahye phir bhi main THANK YOU bhaiyaa bolloongi....Aur Krishna toh uska jeeja hain, so sweeet, kitna care karta hain apni saali ki!!!

Behoodi Arushi, prove kar diya ki aakhir Prats aur Adarsh ki hi toh behen hain naa!! Khoon jaayega kahan, usika toh khoon hain naaa Arushi ke andar!!! Achcha hota, Krishn agar izz lucche ko sabak nahin sikhaya hota toh Arushi ko kya karta........Yaad hain ki Angad kaise dono beheno ko chase kar raha tha, Krishna ne bachaya tha, warna ye dono kya karti..Kya lagta hain ki agar Krishna nahin hota toh Nitin se shaadi ho jaati Prats ki?? Angad hone deta??? Krishna ne un logo ko hataa ke rakha tha, warna Prats kissi se shaadi karne ke layak nahin rehti......Angad ne kidnapp pe bad Prats ka rape nahin kiya Krishna ke darr se, nahin toh Krishna usse maar daalta, Krishna Prats ko us haalat mein bhi apnaata!!! Main usse jaanti hon.....Krishna nahin hota toh Angad aise hi chod deta Prats ko, Krishna ne Prats ko bhi bachaya aur Arushi ko bhi.....Lekin ye Behoode.... saale, behoode!!!!!

SAALE BEHOODE !!

Wah beta Sahi bat hai 😃

Originally posted by: rachna789

Hold on...I don't recall them (Saxenas) ever asking Krishna for help in dealing with Angad. What Krishna did was out of his own will, so how are they supposed to be feeling gratified for that??? They would feel obligated for a "thank you" if Krishna would've done something they'd want done, but beating Angad up wasn't something they wanted.

True they didn't ask for him to beat up Angad. But the bottom line is these EDUCATED people were blind to the fact that the son-in-law had a stab wound and was bleeding and they, as usual were being righteous about it and didn't care to tend to his wounds? As Amma is expected to say today, ......kya Krishna tumara dushman hai? One minute Prof. talks about "hum ab rishthedhar hai" but they treat him like a pariah and allow their daughter to shoot off her mouth. Nice going Sucksenas. Where is the humanity in these shanti-loving sharif loge as they love to brag about themselves? You may dislike the man but he is your son-in-law, can't they show some empathy when he is standing there in blood stained clothes with a stab wound? Ugh!

Originally posted by: MERARAI

True they didn't ask for him to beat up Angad. But the bottom line is these EDUCATED people were blind to the fact that the son-in-law had a stab wound and was bleeding and they, as usual were being righteous about it and didn't care to tend to his wounds? As Amma is expected to say today, ......kya Krishna tumara dushman hai? One minute Prof. talks about "hum ab rishthedhar hai" but they treat him like a pariah and allow their daughter to shoot off her mouth. Nice going Sucksenas. Where is the humanity in these shanti-loving sharif loge as they love to brag about themselves? You may dislike the man but he is your son-in-law, can't they show some empathy when he is standing there in blood stained clothes with a stab wound? Ugh!

Agree
and that too for them. he was bleeding because he fought for them. and @ rachna, how do you know that beating up Angad wasn't something they wanted. well Mr. Saxena can slap him in public that is fine but if Krishna does similar thing it is not fine. well that doesnt make sense to me.

Originally posted by: MERARAI

True they didn't ask for him to beat up Angad. But the bottom line is these EDUCATED people were blind to the fact that the son-in-law had a stab wound and was bleeding and they, as usual were being righteous about it and didn't care to tend to his wounds? As Amma is expected to say today, ......kya Krishna tumara dushman hai? One minute Prof. talks about "hum ab rishthedhar hai" but they treat him like a pariah and allow their daughter to shoot off her mouth. Nice going Sucksenas. Where is the humanity in these shanti-loving sharif loge as they love to brag about themselves? You may dislike the man but he is your son-in-law, can't they show some empathy when he is standing there in blood stained clothes with a stab wound? Ugh!

Education has nothing to do with managing wounds. That's just common sense that they should have, but they didn't and that was wrong. I'm just saying that the way Krishna so-called handled the issue wasn't how they wanted it to be resolved. They also are "shanti-loving" people, so obviously beating up people isn't their way of solving issues.

Originally posted by: vishid

Agree
and that too for them. he was bleeding because he fought for them. and @ rachna, how do you know that beating up Angad wasn't something they wanted. well Mr. Saxena can slap him in public that is fine but if Krishna does similar thing it is not fine. well that doesnt make sense to me.

Originally posted by: vishid

Agree
and that too for them. he was bleeding because he fought for them. and @ rachna, how do you know that beating up Angad wasn't something they wanted. well Mr. Saxena can slap him in public that is fine but if Krishna does similar thing it is not fine. well that doesnt make sense to me.

It doesn't matter whether Krishna fought Angad with or without Sucksena parivaar's blessings. The fact of the matter is his heart was in the right place but his choices were as usual not the best one.

So what, does one first find out how and why someone got stabbed or hurt before they tend to the stab.gunshot wounds? Many a life would be lost around the world if that were the case. Will the Sucksenas really be this indifferent if one of their own children stood there with those wounds? Prof. was standing outside giving Krishna a speech about "jo ho saya, so ho gaya" but it never occurred to him that his damadh was bleeding? They are self-absorbed literates but hypocrites, IMO.

yeh kya lecture hai 😆 aur sub lecture post kiya