Akbar-Ruqs-False Monogamy.Pt2JA Not fiction.Upd-p10,16,18,Ruqs34+35+36 - Page 20

thanx for d info buddy...

Originally posted by: indudolai

thanx for d info buddy...keep posting such info coz we won't able to get such info frm google...thanx u spend so much of ur tym for my Jodha...

Ur welcome.
😊

Hi friends..😊
Giving a break to my truth exposing series of JA...for some time...😊



NEW part introduced::

Part 4 : Jodha-Akbar not fiction..

HOLI CELEBRATION UNDER MUGHALS
AND
MUGHAL / RAJPUTANA ATTIRE OF ROYAL LADIES

Here introducing a light topic..
So, we may connect with the show..👍🏼

Found something on Holi celebration in Mughal times...
And, Mughal WOMEN dressing style.😃

Link is::

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/jodha-akbar/3848936/mughals-ja-real-is-not-fiction-pt4-author-tms-note-on-pg1-and-91

This one is TOTALLY DIFFERENT>...👍🏼

What an absolutely magnificent thread this is! I have gone through every single page in the last hour and loved it. Every bit of it. Some ur verifications here are outstanding! Salute to you fr wrote such detailed and accurate explanations . Too good! 😊

Originally posted by: Angel-

What an absolutely magnificent thread this is! I have gone through every single page in the last hour and loved it. Every bit of it. Some ur verifications here are outstanding! Salute to you fr wrote such detailed and accurate explanations . Too good! 😊

thnx..is all i say..
I really LIKE to share whatever i research...
and, also internet gives the false info..
thats why verifications are required from ORIGINAL sources..

The irony is that-->"even the educated academia", is at times..giving false info...😕...
u must hv seen that ruq's MC track..on page 10..and many more infos...which had truth..but..c we all reject them..😆

Originally posted by: history_geek

Hi Ragsia,
ur advice is totally genuine and thnx for such an option..😊

BUT,😕

i tell u 1 thing, till date, i have edited wikipedia's page of Marium Zamani twice.!!!!😕...

<font color="#FF0000">within "few hours", of editing the page is again restored back to it's normal status..
So, i am totally helpless...
it seems some sort of commercial propaganda is going on against JA, as already mentioned by senior member KDR81.
</font>
and i support my stand from foll. observation,
if u had noticed, wiki's page on MUZ had much MORE POSITIVE info on it before the launch of this serial..!!!!

If u r genuinely concerned, then just do 1 thing..
To any person, proclaiming JA as fiction, just ask him to join "OUR FORUM JA"...👍🏼


and never again he/she will utter a word "WITHOUT VERIFICATION OF FACTS"...

Poor MUZ z under attack bcuz of the show doing well than competitors!
Btw in such a case of wiki info being re-edited, m too real sad!

Hi Abhay,

Originally posted by: katana

Hi Abhay,

In history did Shariffuddin really wanted to marry Jodha. Any idea.

Hi..😊...

Till now ,
Didn't come across any document claiming his "singular intention about Jodha Explicitly"...

But It is "MENTIONED" that he wanted "Amer Royalty to be his hostage".😕..

Yes..
This is also correct that despite Akbar asking him, for release of Amer's prince and 2 nephews of Raja Bharamal, TWICE he ignored, as shown during his marriage event with Heera..😕..

And, even many more events..😊..

Reference::>
1.
Akbarnama,v2,p241,Vrs-1,Ln-2,(Translation from ORIGINAL PERSIAN)...

2.
Royal Archives

Also, later on he rebelled thrice...😕...before meeting his end...😕

The above mentioned info was a 100% fact without any spice.👍🏼Total truth confirmed.
Infact, that marriage event was shown correctly on show.(i mean core events..)


Following from my reading experience::>>

The thing is , even if there were any such info, the emperor would have made sure that no such scum comes up in Royal documents , as this would have involved his closest Relatives...

But, i seriously doubt Sharif's intention..this is what i have inferred regarding his character till now..
And, i doubt his intentions...
Well...still reading...
If in future i get anything i ll PM u.

TFS Abhay.

@ Katana

THNX...

Reading these ORIGINAL Persian accounts is a VERY VERY VERY Tough job.😕🥱
Infact, for me it is tough...
So, i personally do not read them..
Since, i mentioned the info, so had given the references.

The type of English in these books is really..😔...irksome..
They talk indirectly.
Sometimes to connect the events only it takes a lot of time. I left them.

It goes over MY head atleast.
That's the problem. And, they have not given INCIDENTS with explanations..

And, u see Mughal history is not limited ONLY to a few books,here...
We have COUNTLESS books on them.
The lesser known ones are really interesting.
(m talking about the historical accounts of those times not the newly published books.)
😊