AA or SS?????????? - Page 4

Originally posted by: hansa

aur purane saathi bhi auron ki tarah gumrah ho rahe hein!!! 😉😆

ab samajhmen aa raha hai aapke titleka raaz!😉akhir writer jo thahrin! Title bhi dund dund ke laati hain!😆

Originally posted by: anjubala

Hansa ko bahut maja aa raha hai gare murde ukharne mein ??? I can visualise a big smile on her face...

BTW, I like your siggy..cool

I was also going to comment on your siggy,but forgot!

so alag post bana li,akhir mujhe bhi to Dazzler banna hai!😉😆

Originally posted by: veekay

I was also going to comment on your siggy,but forgot!

so alag post bana li,akhir mujhe bhi to Dazzler banna hai!😉😆

Originally posted by: 3322

ofcourse not.apurva was the one who gave birth to armaan and samir would have ruined the character.i mean, can u guys imagine-samir instead of apu in all those passionate romantic scenes? 👎🏼 😲 armaan suri wouldn't have made the mark without apurva.as well said in hindi-dar aaye,darust ayye-tony and diya would be surely accepting this as it would had been their greatest regret if they had not signed apurva.so purab=samir and armaan=apu is damn perfect.it rox.and if u don't agree with my sugggestion, tell me personally, would u have enjoyed jjkn if apu was replaced by samir as armaan?

trueeeeeeee i dont enjoy SS's acting or purab's role at all. all that happenes is for the good.

Originally posted by: hansa

Ok guys, we all have now seen Samir Soni. We also know that he was first approached by T&D to play the role of Armaan which he declined because it had negative shades.

Now my ques is, what if he had accepted the role? Do you think he would have made a better Armaan than Apurva Agnihotri? 😉

Its Aproovra di. 😃

Do let us know your views 😊