Hypocrisy at its best - Page 8

Olaaa Shilpa di!





PS: I just went to pg 9 (hailla the CAPS, my poor eyes) & WOW! Aren't you popular didu?? lolz, "doodh ki dhuli"🤣.. made me laugh... honestly speaking, no one is "doodh ka dhula"😉

Hello everyone!i have been a silent reader all along,but could not stop from making this post. So here goes my first post on IF.

I quite understand and agree with most of what has been said here. However, I find it hard to associate hypocrisy with Arjun(which maybe because of hypocrisy on my part😉)I personally feel that Arjun was established as a flawed character from the very beginning.His barging into the ministers office and banging his head was certainly not in compliance with the law! Moreover he did not join the ETF for any altruistic reasons-he was promised Sikander. Now what can be more selfish than a brilliant cop not wanting to utilise his expertise in the service of the nation unless it serves his personal agenda.?But surprisingly this did not prevent me(maybe us) from admiring,adoring and loving him. I guess we were drawn into his world of anguish to an extent that it became a part of us and thus we were so busy sympathising with those haunted eyes that we forgot to question its morals. And I don't quite want to change that now...my weakness!!Coming back to the issue...though the word hypocrisy has been defined here,I would rather perceive his actions as a conflict in character which is a part of almost all great tragic heroes. If I remember my drama lessons correctly,it's called Hamartia. A brilliant hero with a central flaw which leads to his destruction.

As I usually refrain from making moral judgments I will not try and justify his actions. But if I understood his moral stance correctly he always said that no crime for whatsoever reason should go unpunished. And his reckless attitude shows that he doesn't and would not seek pardon for his "mistakes". He surely does not expect to go unpunished by the law. Thus, I do not see him disrespecting the law which he preaches everyone to adhere to. His sermons at the end establish that his ideals are in place,he has moved away from them. And that is his inner turmoil..the conflict of knowing what is right yet not able to do it.

And honestly speaking after having your wife killed before your eyes,her murder not brought to justice,your friend shunning you, your department not believing you...years spent in desperation,rage,loneliness and pain..I find it commendable that he is still holding on,still able to focus on getting justice for strangers,still able to withstand. Though we don't know the whole story , a police officer usually loses loved ones when he stands up for his ideals refusing to give in to the criminals. If that's the case here then I all the more admire the fact that he still has idealism left in him!

I should rather end my long rambling by saying we are right in having questioned his moral credentials..for they certainly are questionable. But maybe we forget that this is a human being we are talking about. And if he has managed to become more than that in our eyes,then we should be applauding the makers of the show😊

Originally posted by: Sadhana_pr

Hello everyone!i have been a silent reader all along,but could not stop from making this post. So here goes my first post on IF.

I quite understand and agree with most of what has been said here. However, I find it hard to associate hypocrisy with Arjun(which maybe because of hypocrisy on my part😉)I personally feel that Arjun was established as a flawed character from the very beginning.His barging into the ministers office and banging his head was certainly not in compliance with the law! Moreover he did not join the ETF for any altruistic reasons-he was promised Sikander. Now what can be more selfish than a brilliant cop not wanting to utilise his expertise in the service of the nation unless it serves his personal agenda.?But surprisingly this did not prevent me(maybe us) from admiring,adoring and loving him. I guess we were drawn into his world of anguish to an extent that it became a part of us and thus we were so busy sympathising with those haunted eyes that we forgot to question its morals. And I don't quite want to change that now...my weakness!!Coming back to the issue...though the word hypocrisy has been defined here,I would rather perceive his actions as a conflict in character which is a part of almost all great tragic heroes. If I remember my drama lessons correctly,it's called Hamartia. A brilliant hero with a central flaw which leads to his destruction.

As I usually refrain from making moral judgments I will not try and justify his actions. But if I understood his moral stance correctly he always said that no crime for whatsoever reason should go unpunished. And his reckless attitude shows that he doesn't and would not seek pardon for his "mistakes". He surely does not expect to go unpunished by the law. Thus, I do not see him disrespecting the law which he preaches everyone to adhere to. His sermons at the end establish that his ideals are in place,he has moved away from them. And that is his inner turmoil..the conflict of knowing what is right yet not able to do it.

And honestly speaking after having your wife killed before your eyes,her murder not brought to justice,your friend shunning you, your department not believing you...years spent in desperation,rage,loneliness and pain..I find it commendable that he is still holding on,still able to focus on getting justice for strangers,still able to withstand. Though we don't know the whole story , a police officer usually loses loved ones when he stands up for his ideals refusing to give in to the criminals. If that's the case here then I all the more admire the fact that he still has idealism left in him!

I should rather end my long rambling by saying we are right in having questioned his moral credentials..for they certainly are questionable. But maybe we forget that this is a human being we are talking about. And if he has managed to become more than that in our eyes,then we should be applauding the makers of the show😊

Oops..I have problems replying!!..anyways that was very sweet of u! Thanks a lot😊

The murder of a loved one and the pain that comes with that is just the same for everyone whether it is a wife or a husband or father or mother or child...it doesn't matter if the person is a common man or police officer or president...
So when I watched saturday's episode, I kept asking myself the same question...whatever Arjun was telling, doesn't it count for him as well???

Originally posted by: Sadhana_pr

Hello everyone!i
have been a silent reader all along,but could not stop from making
this post. So here goes my first post on IF.

I quite understand and
agree with most of what has been said here. However, I find it hard
to associate hypocrisy with Arjun(which maybe because of hypocrisy on
my part😉)I
personally feel that Arjun was established as a flawed character from
the very beginning.His barging into the ministers office and banging
his head was certainly not in compliance with the law! Moreover he
did not join the ETF for any altruistic reasons-he was promised
Sikander. Now what can be more selfish than a brilliant cop not
wanting to utilise his expertise in the service of the nation unless
it serves his personal agenda.?But surprisingly this did not prevent
me(maybe us) from admiring,adoring and loving him. I guess we were
drawn into his world of anguish to an extent that it became a part of
us and thus we were so busy sympathising with those haunted eyes that
we forgot to question its morals. And I don't quite want to change
that now...my weakness!!Coming back to the issue...though the word
hypocrisy has been defined here,I would rather perceive his actions
as a conflict in character which is a part of almost all great tragic
heroes. If I remember my drama lessons correctly,it's called
Hamartia. A brilliant hero with a central flaw which leads to his
destruction.

As I usually refrain
from making moral judgments I will not try and justify his actions.
But if I understood his moral stance correctly he always said that no
crime for whatsoever reason should go unpunished. And his reckless
attitude shows that he doesn't and would not seek pardon for his
"mistakes". He surely does not expect to go unpunished by
the law. Thus, I do not see him disrespecting the law which he
preaches everyone to adhere to. His sermons at the end establish that
his ideals are in place,he has moved away from them. And that is his
inner turmoil..the conflict of knowing what is right yet not able to
do it.

And honestly
speaking after having your wife killed before your eyes,her murder
not brought to justice,your friend shunning you, your department not
believing you...years spent in desperation,rage,loneliness and
pain..I find it commendable that he is still holding on,still able to
focus on getting justice for strangers,still able to withstand.
Though we don't know the whole story , a police officer usually loses
loved ones when he stands up for his ideals refusing to give in to
the criminals. If that's the case here then I all the more admire the
fact that he still has idealism left in him!

I should rather end
my long rambling by saying we are right in having questioned his
moral credentials..for they certainly are questionable. But maybe we
forget that this is a human being we are talking about. And if he has
managed to become more than that in our eyes,then we should be
applauding the makers of the show😊

very well written 👏
welcome to d forum
hope u have a gud tym here
ps. u r newbie so u can post only 10cments in a day dats why u hv problem
its ok wen we all r newbies happen wid us too
R]50posts n u becum groupbie 😛
pps. shilpa di lol dhdh ka dhoola kaun h ajkal lol
no one
in btw caps oops
no one has d right to teach u n others wat do or not
do respect get respect 😉