just thot to share my small conversation with uthkarsh naithani.. who is writer of DKDM..
many of us think.. y DKDM is undermining parvati's abilities .. thts wht i felt.. specially after ramayan track started..
soo just posting it to u.. he cleared my doubt to a much extent..
my post...
why does parvati keep asking about future to shiv? "swami aap toh tri kaal gyaani ho.. aap bataiye kya hoga".. (dilogues like this) and ... why is she so excited like normal human beings so excited about knowing future from shiv..??
1. she herself is adishakti and ardh-nareshwari.. so of course she must also be tri-kaal-gyaani..
2. any normal human being after crossing levels of chakra.. gets that power to know future..
3. many maharishis also had that ability to learn about future even in ramayan and mahabharata period.
ok agreed.. may be she wants to hear about future from shivji himself.. or may be because it is mahadev based show.. u have shown it that way... and also it is fiction(u show that content in starting of every episode..)
but dont you think you are undermining devi parvati's ability...???
please answer my question..
i am not intending to argue about the content you are showing.. bt just having a small doubt.. please clarify...
and his reply..
Dear Mithila ji,
Parvati's excitement has been taken straight from "Raamcharit Maanas" ... In that, The entire Raamayan is a narration by Mahadev to Parvati. So your question is actually to Tulsidaas Anyway, here my humble responses to your doubts. (My intention is to share what i feel... i don't claim that i shall clear ur doubts... i can only do my best)
1) I am certain about she being Trikaaldarshi. But the Puraans have plenty of examples of she showing Human tendencies... Especially in Shiv-Puraan where she rarely shows the signs of sensing the future (Kaali being one examples... but there are many others... including Jalandhar and Andhak, where she doesn't show this sign)
2) Do they? I don't know... I've literally travelled in search of them. i encourage you to explore this statement beyond the examples given to you from books which may or may not be telling you the exact truth.
3) Yes... many Rishis... but either their sight was momentary or the authors forgot about their sight, coz everyone keeps acting like they don't know. Prime example being SHUKRACHARYA who has been repeatedly termed Trikaaldarshi... and yet his actions don't always show that
In summary, allow me to humbly point out that when it comes to Devi Parvati's abilities... neither i know of the extent... and nor do You
We are all speculating... it's just abut our own beliefs. You feel the way you do because of your own belief system.
You'd be surprised by how many such messages i have received saying i have undermined Vishnu's ability.
We can't and don't intend pleasing everyone. Unfortunately, we have been brought up with teachings where we feel hurt (and at times take offence) if Gods of our beliefs are not depicted according to our beliefs
It's not right or wrong... we are just conditioned to think that way.
So No... i do not think i am undermining The Devi's ability. She's far beyond my insignificant understandings... or anybody's understanding for that matter.
(I could've said that i am going by the puraans... but ur question is deeper... so i'm not talking about being right or wrong here)
You see Mithila ji, If i say that the number 5000 is same as 100, then i'm undermining 5000.
But if i say Infinity is equal to 100, that's a meaningless statement... for Infinity is nothing and Everything at the same time
As Mahadev says in DKDM: "Main vo hoon, jo nahi hai. Jo nahi hai... Vo Main hoon."
.
.
.
well just shared it... i hope ur doubt is also clarified .. like mine...