what the hell? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

21

Views

3.2k

Users

13

Likes

27

Frequent Posters

Autumn_Rose thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: LuvMishalRaheja

How can we be so sure that they'd attack Amer ?

I don't think they'd follow exactly what they've shown in the promos . 🤔


Because as far as I know, the marriage will be a political alliance. They may not attack Amer.. But Amer is the deal between the marriage.

And to the OP
If we were to be historically speaking.. there is no evidence that Jodha was from Amer. She may have been from Jodhpur... hence the name Jodha bai. If you were to question everything, you will realize that movies and TV shows are not factual. It's all for entertainment and money, not informational enlightenment.

Originally posted by: kundra

This is Ekta not Sagar Arts. I wish the Sagars were making this instead.


I don't think they'll ever make a show on the mughals. They don't do anti-heroes kind of stuff.

Originally posted by: blahblah26

Haye Ram. How baseless can one's arguments be? Someone commented that the show is fictional and the TM interpreted it as Akbar is fictional. If you really want real history please watch a good documentary about it or read a book. If you want to watch the show watch it without linking every damn thing with history. Because it won't affect me neither will it affect the other viewers, it will only affect you because you will be frustrated that it's not following history.


But definitely not history channel.

History channel is doing to history what MTv has done to music.
🤣
Reading books might be a better option. Everything today is done for money. 🤔
Edited by BreezeStar - 12 years ago
Star_girl thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#22
what are you saying? was akbar a FICTION?
don't try to save it giving illogical explanations.
akbar remained in bairam khan's tutelage only for four years, by 17 or 18 age of akbar, khan was dead or deserted from his vazir post.
abul fazl wrote that his rude and proud behaviour lead to his demise.

Dear lord. I meant the story is fictional here, I did not say Akbar was a fictional character. And since the story is fictional, there is creative license. I don't get it, if you dislike the distortion of history that much, why are you watching an Ekta show? Did you really think she will go for a faithful representation of history? This is quite ridiculous. And please, we already had more than enough discussions about the same old conflict between history and fiction. Please do not start another. If you really hate the apparent inaccuracy, do not watch the show. Simple.
Edited by Stargirl06 - 12 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".