The tru bollywood star..... - Page 2

looks wise obviously its hrithik
but acting wise they're both good
it depends on wat u think is good acting
i prefer hrithik over srk!

agree with you that SRK is better than Hrithik....but Hrithik has only been in the industry for 6 yrs...and I dont know why every1 gives all the credit to his dad...his dad makes the films but his dad isnt the one actign in them...Rakesh is a good story writer and director but its Hrithik who is the actor who makes all his dads films hit with his acting...if Hrithik wasnt a good actor would his dad keep taking him in his films...and plus before Hrithik was told that he could never become an actors because of some problem that he had...but he still worked on his acting skills, dance skills and on his body and now all his hard work shows off.....I agree that SRK had started from only a television show and worked his way up....but he only delivers hits with big banners...it was actually the Chopras that made him popular and after that the Johars....so I think that even tho SRK is a bigger actor...but its wrong to call hrithik a dad made star....

~Rashi~

srk has proved himslef without any god father on both tv and film and he is the only actor who made it big on tv and become king of bollywod. about hritick u can't ignore the fact that his dad has a big disturbution in his career cause there are probably many actors who are excellent but still struggling for make it big in bollywood and lookinf for chance . and about what u said that chpras and johars have made srk.if chopras have made him big star then why can't they make their own son uday star . and johars came when srk was already a star. no body has done any thing for srk to make him big star , he has earned his status of king of bollywood and big banners cast him because they know that the film with srk would be thier benifit.

👏 srk rules

I feel Hrithik is a more complete and versatile actor....I find SRK Too boriign nowadays----or maybe its just that I don't fancy old men.....SRK has become very repititive I feel.....

Originally posted by: srk_biggest_fan

agree with you that SRK is better than Hrithik....but Hrithik has only been in the industry for 6 yrs...and I dont know why every1 gives all the credit to his dad...his dad makes the films but his dad isnt the one actign in them...Rakesh is a good story writer and director but its Hrithik who is the actor who makes all his dads films hit with his acting...if Hrithik wasnt a good actor would his dad keep taking him in his films...and plus before Hrithik was told that he could never become an actors because of some problem that he had...but he still worked on his acting skills, dance skills and on his body and now all his hard work shows off.....I agree that SRK had started from only a television show and worked his way up....but he only delivers hits with big banners...it was actually the Chopras that made him popular and after that the Johars....so I think that even tho SRK is a bigger actor...but its wrong to call hrithik a dad made star....

~Rashi~

srk has proved himslef without any god father on both tv and film and he is the only actor who made it big on tv and become king of bollywod. about hritick u can't ignore the fact that his dad has a big disturbution in his career cause there are probably many actors who are excellent but still struggling for make it big in bollywood and lookinf for chance . and about what u said that chpras and johars have made srk.if chopras have made him big star then why can't they make their own son uday star . and johars came when srk was already a star. no body has done any thing for srk to make him big star , he has earned his status of king of bollywood and big banners cast him because they know that the film with srk would be thier benifit.

👏 srk rules

lol u jsut proved my point there....Yash Chopra is probably the biggest director of bollywood and he wasnt able to make his son Uday successful, because Uday isnt a good actor.....if Hrithik wasnt a good actor would his father keep taking him in his films...so hrithik isnt a dad made star...and its not his fault he was born in a family where his father is a great director....and there are many other superstars whose sons havent made it big in the industry and the reason is clear....that they just cant act....if SRK stuggled to get to the status at which he is at now...then so did Hrithik....Hrithik would work at his dads sets and go around giving every1 tea and doing other things which u wouldnt really find other actors doing....SRK's no.1 postion in bollywood isnt gonna stay there for too long.....he might be the king khan but no for to long...because hes soon going to have lots of competition with not only hrithik but other rising stars and also the other established actors

~Rashi~

Let's wait and watch.....Shahrukh's been in the industry for 15 odd years....Hrithik in less than half of those..so after another 7 years we'll see what Hrithik's career graph looks like....but the bottom line is in the 6 years he has proved that he's a brilliant actor and the future superstar. How many actors have won both the Best Newcomer and Best actor awards in their debut film?????

I think hrithk has had a variety of roles in such a short time length of his carrer if you look at his films thye have had very varied type of characters. Apart from Baazigar and Darr SRK has been popular for his love stories. As for hrithik he has good meaningful films even if they have flooped the roles have all been different not repepative like SRK. For Example FIZA, Mission Kashmir, KNPH< K3g,.

He has nt got the tag of a romintic or any other tye of hero yet so i think if you look at varety then hrithik wins.

Sorry to up set any SRK Fans or Hrithik fan I my self am an AB JUNIOR FAN