Rachna is right.

Although being hostile towards a person is not good.

No way dear your assumption in accordance to me I wrong ...ohk les put u in the situation can u beleive that ur sister can do anything so much bad with u as rachna is thinking right now ???????

^^ thats just it. she's NOT rachna's sister. if she was, rachna wouldve tried to think a little. i think gunjan should try and back off...coz when u dislike someone, everything they DO is annoying...and whatever gunjan says, rachna will just look at it in the wrong way, adding fuel to the already raging fire. gunjan should stay away and use her brain and her actions to show she's right...talking to someone who wont listen isnt the best solution...

I think Gunjan has essentially been trying to avoid Rachna for the past few weeks but Charu creates circumstances that force Gunjan to have to try to justify her actions and prove herself innocent in front of Rachna. So should Gunjan not even try to clear Rachna's misconceptions when she is directly blamed and put to trial in front of the entire family?? I don't really think that doing that is "adding fuel to the fire" because how can anyone stand to be accused for something they never did? I think it is a natural instinctual reaction to prove yourself innocent if you are being accused for something you didn't do (you are automatically going to be defensive for yourself).

Originally posted by: sanayah

No way dear your assumption in accordance to me I wrong ...ohk les put u in the situation can u beleive that ur sister can do anything so much bad with u as rachna is thinking right now ???????

I agree with you to an extent.

But, I don't see either Rachna or Gunjan's fault in the current scenario.

The CVs brought in this cartoon Charu to create misunderstanding between the two. Now even if Gunjan leaves Rachna alone, Charu is hell bent on creating circumstances where things go wrong between these 2 sisters.

Both Rachna and Gunjan totally ROCK as a sister DUO!

It's the CVs who need to use their brain.

Originally posted by: gyadav

I think Gunjan has essentially been trying to avoid Rachna for the past few weeks but Charu creates circumstances that force Gunjan to have to try to justify her actions and prove herself innocent in front of Rachna. So should Gunjan not even try to clear Rachna's misconceptions when she is directly blamed and put to trial in front of the entire family?? I don't really think that doing that is "adding fuel to the fire" because how can anyone stand to be accused for something they never did? I think it is a natural instinctual reaction to prove yourself innocent if you are being accused for something you didn't do (you are automatically going to be defensive for yourself).

Up to an extent I also agree with you. Gunjan knows Rachna is frustrated with her ever since she "saved" her from Vihaan. Her intentions are always positive but it backfired in Rachna's eyes. Gunjan should have told Rachna about the fake engagement to start with, and included her in the plan to expose Vihaan, along with Mayank. Then Rachna would have been better. But after Rachna saw that, she feels that she needs to prove herself to the world. And yes, it is natural for anyone who is in such a competitive spirit to feel threatened by even her sister. But anyways yes Rachna should have had a little more trust in her sister than in Charu, but still Gunjan also should have understood a little and backed away. Still, in the end I think it balances out and so neither one is truely to blame here.