People of Foreign Origin!!!

Hi Friends!!!

The term People of Foreign origin is directly proportinal to Mrs Sonia Gandhi.We got bored of this term during previous LokSabha elections.After the election results there was huge uproar in every nook and corner of India( rather World).I too got worried with the thought "What if Mrs Gandhi becomes Prime Minister of India?",infact at that time I prayed sincerely to God to do some miracle and God heard my prayers Mata Gandhi renounced the post👏.So everything is fine now.

So many Indians are in every nook and corner of the World,from fiji to Chicago.They are going to those countries for some studies ,work and are getting settled there permanently.They are settling there soooo much that they are contesting and Winning in that countries elections.We in India support them very much and celebrate if they win.Is'nt a paradox.

We don't accept people of foriegn origin as our country heads but at the same time appreciate our fellow Indians if they win in another country.

My question is

"Should people of foriegn origin know their limits and just do their work without interferingin that countries administration?"

"Say that country accepts foriegn origin people as leaders,will they get the respect,affection from local people?"

Please feel free to express your views .

Cheers,

Mythili

Originally posted by: mythili_Kiran

Hi Friends!!!

The term People of Foreign origin is directly proportinal to Mrs Sonia Gandhi.We got bored of this term during previous LokSabha elections.After the election results there was huge uproar in every nook and corner of India( rather World).I too got worried with the thought "What if Mrs Gandhi becomes Prime Minister of India?",infact at that time I prayed sincerely to God to do some miracle and God heard my prayers Mata Gandhi renounced the post👏.So everything is fine now.

So many Indians are in every nook and corner of the World,from fiji to Chicago.They are going to those countries for some studies ,work and are getting settled there permanently.They are settling there soooo much that they are contesting and Winning in that countries elections.We in India support them very much and celebrate if they win.Is'nt a paradox.

it surely a paradox...

We don't accept people of foriegn origin as our country heads but at the same time appreciate our fellow Indians if they win in another country.

My question is

"Should people of foriegn origin know their limits and just do their work without interferingin that countries administration?"

when u change your base to some other country, u try and get adjusted there...u do preserve your values and principals but at the end of the day u have to accept the truth..

if foriegners are there for a short period of time and has not contributed in any way to the country then they should keep away from the countries administration...but

as in the case of foriegners who have not only shifted to those countries..but also contributed to the progress of that country..then they have full rights to take part in administration..

Say that country accepts foriegn origin people as leaders,will they get the respect,affection from local people?"

they will get the respect and affection from local people...if u are a true leader and understanding their problems and trying ur best to solve them.

if u can relate to people and can be one of them then i dont think the origin will matter much

Please feel free to express your views .

Cheers,

Mythili

hope u like my answers mythili😊

Originally posted by: himali_kokate

Nice point!!! Let us see what our pardesi friends of IF say about this!!!!😊

Originally posted by: mythili_Kiran

Jindal was born June 10, 1971 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. He was elected to the US House of Representatives Nov 2, 2004, from Louisiana.

Bobby Jindal is as American as George Bush, He is a US Citizen first, then anything else, so he can contest for Presidency(yeah that will happen sometime in the next 100 hrs, they are yet to even elect a black or a woman) Vs Arnold who is an Austrian born but a naturalized US citizen, but according to current laws he cannot contest for presidency

With Sonia Gandhi she is a born Italian and a naturalized Indian Citizen, she is an Italian citizen first then an Indian citizen(I dont know if she renounced her Italian Citizenship). So she falls in the Arnold category. I dont know many countries where naturalized citizens are allowed to hold the highest office of the country.

Why is this distinction there?

It is b'cos you should be in 0% doubt about who holds your first loyalty. If supposed there was a war between Italy and India, India had to resort to nuclear option to safeguard its integrity. Would you be comfortable having Sonia Gandhi as your PM? Would you trust her to nuke Italy to save India? Nothing against Sonia Gandhi, that family has paid a huge price for the country, far more than me, but this is what drives the question for me

Originally posted by: ChameliKaYaar

My belief is that the top post of a nation should go to a person who rules the heart and mind of masses, who understands the needs of cross section of the society in the land that s/he is going to lead. In last election, Congress Party clearly won majority in large part due to Sonia's campaign, which shows that she has the mass appeal. She has also shown, time and again, maturity in dealing with the masses. She has shown that she is not the one to rule from within safe confines of air conditioned bungalows. That she can co-mingle with the masses (like her late husband). She has been in India for more than 20 years and is an Indian citizen. She dresses like an Indian more than most of the modern Indian women do. What else are we looking for which disqualifies her from leadning the country.

I mean, let us face the fact, she is ruling the country by proxy anyways. One day she will fire from her son's shoulders. 😉