When talent is judged by votes

Originally posted by: Manoj_Tina fan

BALL IN THE PUBLIC'S COURT

Debojit Saha feels, "When you repose responsibility in the public, there shouldn't be further debate. They judge the person and not the talent per se. A lot of hype was created when I was voted the best, putting my votes under the region scanner. I stand by the fact that if your family members don't support you then it's foolish to expect anything from outsiders."

i agree with Debojit. if public is bestowed the responsibilty then u shud respect their choice n if u really think public cant take the rite decission then u shudnt endow them with such responsibility.

Originally posted by: the_bubbly_gurl

how cud ila arun say that .my qazu is da best he had to win after all.n their talent is for the ppl.n by voting ppl choose whom they like n wat they want to c or hear.so if the judges choose where will the public demand go.cmon guys india is the gr8test democracy how can they say that 😡

thts xactly wat i think.

Originally posted by: Manoj_Tina fan

GURUS SHARE THEIR ANGST

Known for her crisp judgements in Nach Baliye, Saroj Khan avers, "Judges have the last say, but we say things technically. Before choosing the right people, it is imperative to be assured of their popularity." But singer Ila Arun begs to differ. "It kills talent," she says, adding, "Reality shows should be based either on voting or on the judges' decision. In Fame Gurukul the panel was shocked when Qazi Tauqeer won. The other contenders are discouraged but keeping the channel happy is more important. A reality show is all about the desire to win. So showing both healthy and unhealthy competition is a part of the game but when the public votes, the results are shocking."

Originally posted by: Modesty

Hi All.

Now I can't believe she's the same Ilaji who rooted for Qazi. The only ppl who were somewhat unhappy were Prashant and Padma. However when Prashant sir was asked to comment on the Qazi's singing during the concert he was pretty impressed and even spoke about Qazi's metamorphosis at length. He was a clear favorite of the Judges during the Final rounds.

We know he's hardworking and one day all his critics would be eating their words.

Thanks.

xactly Manju. i m shocked to c Ilaji's response. it was she who had a wrangle with Prashant sir n Padma mam 4 saving Qazi. now she is changing her tone!! thts so pathetic!!!

yeah m sure tht they who r criticizing him 2day, will commend his work soon InshaAllah!!!

Originally posted by: Manoj_Tina fan

When talent is judged by votes

Can voting be the be all and end all of choosing the best participant in a talent hunt show, especially after the method has received so much flak?

This is democracy at its best. Forget politicians, even singers, dancers and actors are chosen by the public nowadays, thanks to the talent hunt shows. As everybody from little girls to screen divas ask you to vote in their support, BT focuses on this talent hunting ka naya funda, which has left most of the 'talented' contenders high and dry.

IT'S NOT ALL FAIR

Vinit Singh, who lost to Debojit Saha in Sa Re Ga Ma Pa despite being considered more talented of the two, says, "Voting ceases to be sacrosanct when candidate's family start providing free booths to public to cast their votes. Mobile companies in the regions provide free SMS facilities. To check things like these, only one vote per phone should be allowed."
Adds Rajeswari Sachdev Badola, who participated in a reality show. "There's no foolproof pattern and the ratio of people voting in one city varies from another. Some areas don't have network coverage."

BIG BUCKS RULE

The commercial angle is of prime consideration for the channels and the sponsors. Pooja Bedi, participant of Jhalak Dikhala Ja reasons, "In the West phone lines are open for two hours after the show is aired and it is ensured that not more than one vote is registered per calling number. In India, service providers allow any number of votes to be cast. So, if there are a thousand loyalists and they have mobile phones, fairness goes for a six." Rati Agnihotri seconds her opinion, "I have been voted out of a reality dance show but I don't know anything about the polls. Whatever decision is given, participants have to accept it blindly. I don't know where I stood, all that I know is the judges' verdict."

GURUS SHARE THEIR ANGST

Known for her crisp judgements in Nach Baliye, Saroj Khan avers, "Judges have the last say, but we say things technically. Before choosing the right people, it is imperative to be assured of their popularity." But singer Ila Arun begs to differ. "It kills talent," she says, adding, "Reality shows should be based either on voting or on the judges' decision. In Fame Gurukul the panel was shocked when Qazi Tauqeer won. The other contenders are discouraged but keeping the channel happy is more important. A reality show is all about the desire to win. So showing both healthy and unhealthy competition is a part of the game but when the public votes, the results are shocking."

BALL IN THE PUBLIC'S COURT

Debojit Saha feels, "When you repose responsibility in the public, there shouldn't be further debate. They judge the person and not the talent per se. A lot of hype was created when I was voted the best, putting my votes under the region scanner. I stand by the fact that if your family members don't support you then it's foolish to expect anything from outsiders." Indian Idol Abhijeet Sawant reasons, "I don't think voting is justified at times, but I see more advantages than disadvantages here. Popularity that comes by way of voting can do wonders for one's career."

http://epaper.timesofindia.com/

Vinit is just defistated that the LIE himesh and he HELD before everyone FELL APART.

It was all about his love, It wasnt about SINGING for Himesh but about revealing VINIT's LOVE AFFAIR and that whole thing BLEW UP in their FACES!

I was more than happy that it happened that way. 👏