Here we go again sita mai [note p.2]

Page

Next Last

indianstargyul

@indianstargyul

Explorer

Posted: 12 years ago

So sita mai presents Sugni with two charmed stones out of nowhere. Sia mai is as confused as the cvs😆 i present a list of confusion:

1. She approves Adini marriage

2. she approves Sugni running back to vickram ..all the danger signs , vickram picture falling etc

3.she approves her decision to sleep with vickram to save Ad

4.so why did she present Sugni with the2 stones???? to chant" save me sita mai" while she is in bed with vickram.?

5.I have never seen a more mixed up diety who keeps giving her devotee mixed signals...lol ( no offence, dont mean to be offensive ppl, ok) just stating some facts.

6. when Sm gives her devotee mix signal, we the audience have to suffer, as it leaves us mentally exhausted..lol

7. Vickram is now a vile man, hmm so says Sugni, . A vile man who wont mend his ways..i leave you all to comment on that part

Edited by -Ravjot- - 12 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Suresh

@suresh555

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

The stones were to hit budda VS below the belt and take care of him for good 😆

Saat janmon tak Suhaag raat nahin manayega 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Vinnie79

@Vinnie79

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

A big contention I have had wit this Serial is the use of God as an expliantion of their stupid behavior and writing...when thier is no logical explanation for something just throw in Sita Miya and waalah it is all explained. To add to your list I will say:

Sita Miya was also present when Sugni first danced Rail as he was te one to save her,

Sita miya was also present when Sugni walked away from her mother and went with Vickram to the temple.

Sita Miya was there at Adi _Amrita's engagement when Sugni came to meet Vickram.

Why is not Sita Miya helping Sugni to find the real culprit and cause for Vickram's hatred i.e. Rewa.?
Why is Sita Miya allowing a murderess to walk free.?
Why is Sita Miya allowing Sugni to play the part of Victim here, and not see that her actions over the past few weeks have made her look no less than an egotistical greedy self centered lady.
Only Sita Miya knows the answer to that question and when the CV's write the Answer for Sita Miya we will get it! 😆

Quote

Julie

@JulieD

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

I just want to add that I cannot fathom Sita maiyaa wanting to ruin a family like that:

Vikram-Aditya

Aditya-Jiji

Aditya-MT

Aditya-Amrita

Seriously, this is what Sita maiyaa wants? 😕

Quote

mohanisha

@mohanisha

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: suresh555
The stones were to hit budda VS below the belt and take care of him for good 😆

Saat janmon tak Suhaag raat nahin manayega 😆

Please watch your language. We live in a well educated society. Zee TV is showing nonsense that doesn't mean we also talk rubbish. Thanks

Quote

Sandy

@Sandy66

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

😊Gosh "Suresh", first you want to" Lorena Bobbitt"
Vickram private part, and now you want Sugni hit him below the belt with the stones and injured his manhood. Wow really, if you saw the show from the beginning you wouldn't make such a cheap remark about those "scared stones"

Edited by Sandy66 - 12 years ago

Quote

Anastasia Smith

@ForeverSHINee

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

Guys leave it. I reported Suresh's comment. You people can also report it if you want.

Quote

Suresh

@suresh555

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

Thank you guys for the "bash suresh event"

Atleast I used indirect language unlike the harsh words and filthy language that has been used on Sugni, Adi and Gulabia. So, I guess I would have been spared if I commented on these characters but I am being crucified because its Vikram?

Thank you again :)

Quote

Suresh

@suresh555

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Sandy66
😊Gosh "Suresh", first you want to" Lorena Bobbitt"
Vickram private part, and now you want Sugni hit him below the belt with the stones and injured his manhood. Wow really, if you saw the show from the beginning you wouldn't make such a cheap remark about those "scared stones"

So, if I said they should do a "Lorena Bobbitt" on Vikram you were offended but you had no problems about several comments that were in this forum that indicated Sugni deserved it if she was to be raped?

Edited by suresh555 - 12 years ago

Quote

croziaxx

@croziaxx

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

#10

they insulting to god continuously ...

Quote

1 2

Here we go again sita mai [note p.2]

Related Topics

Explore Topics