Sherma you are absolutely right..
Purvi was supposed to go back to Deshmukhs to join the family...This has nothing to do with what Sulo-Archana did to Manju-Punni..
In PR there are two diff rules..
One for Sulo-Archana-Purvi
Others for
Deshmukhs and Manju or Varsha
If Sulo over heard manju-punni's convo she should sit down and talk with her son and Manju saying Vinod does not need to give his sallary to Sulo...Give it to Manju to run the household...If SUlo has pension coming she can also share a little bit as Manju-Vinod has 2 daughters to get married...This is Karanjkar problem..
All Archana had to do was tell Purvi to move in with them no Q asked...What was Manju going to do? She cant hold Purvi back..
Why involve Archana and especially Savita for Karanjkar issues?
I would not want my Samdhan getting involved in my family issues...Keep respect and boundries...
I thought it was pretty selfish of Sulo-Archana to use Savita and how they handled Manju..
Vinod should not have given his sallary to his mother...he is 60 yrs old man for crying out loud ...A married man with 2 adult daughters...Who does that this day and age?
Would Archana like Savita getting Manav's full income in her hand?? NO
Manav's money was in archanas hands and extra were put in FDs also in Archana's name...Why double standards?
Sherma I just posted a topic on how I want old Savita back...Not the evil or scheaming but straight forward, fiesty, no nonsense candid woman who kept everyone in check...