About Ramayan and Shiv Dhanus

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#11

One more thing - Sita lifting or moving that bow is not there in Valmiki, if one looks @ the relevant link that I provided. If it was there in Tulsidas or any of the medieval creations, then you would automatically be proven right - it was indeed the invention of some people in those times, and the validity of what they wrote are about as good as what we write in CNAT.

Quote

.Reshama.

@.Reshama.

Sparkler

Posted: 12 years ago

#12

@Vrish

Yeah, they are showing Parvati, Kartikeya, Nandi all in a poor light, but they're not doing that w/ Narayan, even when the original scriptures have it that way. If they can undermine Kartikeya's achievement by showing Mahadev rescuing him at

the last moment, why can't they undermine Narayan by showing him get knocked unconscious by Veerbhadra, as actually happened? If they want to show Mahadev as supreme, how do they show it by showing Vishnu as being more powerful than Parvati (as in the episode of whose lingum survived the gale)?I agree that they haven't glorified any other gods, except Narayan. In fact, after Mahadev himself, Narayan is the only one who has gotten a favorable treatment. Well said vrish i agree with u 100%!!

Quote

1 2

About Ramayan and Shiv Dhanus - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics