Now that the dowry case is closed i was thinking to have a discussion on this issue.
some questions to start with
- are you in favour of dowry?
- Does a hubby has the right to beat his wife for not enough dowry?
- Does a mother-in-law has a right to taunt daughter-in-law for a miscarriage?
- should a daughter disclose to her parents and relatives about whats happening with her in her in-laws?
I think the lawyer was too good, the one who was against Sati. His arguements were too good BUT he kept shouting and raising his voice, which i don't think is good. If you think psychlogically, one who shouts somehow feels that his words are not "TRUE" and doesn't believe what he is saying is right and thats why he raises his/her voice.
The psychology thing that the opposite lawyer raised was to good, but it did NOT include everyone in the world. and why i say that i coz the psychologists don't know much about Sub-continent and the values/cultre there. i think that was just a useless point raised and the judge didn't even question him that how does this is relevant to Usha Jaswal.
Usha might not have been educated, and if someone doesnt know how to write how can they write a suicide note? i wanna meet the writer and the psychologists and ask them this question.
do share your views, plz dont just write i agree with u, it really annoys me