🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: S 8 - M43: India vs South Afrika🏏
MUKTI vs MAIRA 22.2
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: S8 - M41: New Zealand vs Pakistan🏏
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Super 8 - M42: England vs Sri Lanka🏏
Gift of Giving: A Creative Writing Contest: WINNER ANNOUNCEMENT
Shahid Kapoor Questions Credibility of Critics
the bang on statement was archana the new sulochana
well i don't have anything against ovibut don't we need a new savita from arjun's side to keep a check on the sulochana part 2 i.e archana part 1 and keep her in her levelashna is not there , but atleast they can bring arjun's some strong aunty to act as savita part 2 and show sulochana part 2 her real worth😈😈
I don't think these 2 were similar; the only similarity might be that it was a triangle between 3 people of tangled relationships.
But the circumstances under which Shravani agreed to marry Manav was very different. She was a unwed mom carrying the baby of a dead fiance...circumstances isn't even conducive now in India, for an unwed mom to give birth to a baby. The circumstances I thought were very complicated then, and the Indian audience were pulled towards their TV screen to see what could happen...a couple already married, giving up on their marriage to clear the path for a baby to enter the world with a dad's name...
In the Ovi/Arjun/Purvi, case to me it is just a triangle love story, the one we see in bollywood movies all the time, resulting due to misunderstanding and miscommunication...there isn't a life at stake, unless of course, CVs come up with some interesting track for Ovi, making is 'out of the box' storyline...