.are there more suppoter for yukta at?

Hello frns,😃 let me introduce myself first- i m shraddha and this is my first post on this forum. I m not a die hard fan or regular viewer of uttaran but my aunt is crazy about this show and thats how i m updated with story of this show. When taps and iccha were kids, i liked watching it. But then after first leap cvs started playing pass the parcel game between various trio( taps-veer-iccha, ansha-iccha-veer, rathore-taps-veer)and i totally lost interest.
Again after 2nd leap i started watching epi (though not regularly ) just 4 two new entries who are 1 of my fav actors saurabh and sreejita. And i was excited to see them paired opposit each other. But many of the forum members started saying they are bro and sis and i was shocked to read it .
I went through all the post of yukta supporter and the one who are against it and came to a conclusion that yukta relation is NOT LIKE BRO-SIS RELATIONSHIP .
Reasons
1 they are not biological related and neitier step bro-sis. Both mukata and yuvi have different father and mother.
2. Now one problem is that tapsya was married to veer for few month. And this was making me uncomfortable wid yukta.But then i remembered wedding of taps and veer. Veer married taps thinking she is iccha, and he never accepted her as his wife neither they had any physical relation.
Also i never support a forced marriage, according to religion and law also it will be not valid as veer never gave those vachan and promise to tapsya, He did all the rituals thinking she is iccha. So this marriage becomes nullfied.
3 adoption
veer and iccha considered mukata like her daughter and tapsya and rathored loved yuvi like their son.
But there is difference between mr a is like my son and mr a is my son.
They were temporary gurdian of chilldrens and not parents.
If they had legally or with religious rituals adopted mukta permanently, she would be with ammo or veer's family and not wid jogi.
And in india damad is like son( yes he is son of rathore and taps😆) and daughter in law is supposed to be like daughter( iccha already considers mukku like her daughter😉).
If after adoption both kids were raised in 1 family as brother and sis, then you could have labelled them as sibling(like mukku and kanha).
4breastfeeding
plz iccha was pregnant when she found mukata and when she gave birth to yuvi , she was almost 1 yr old.
Let me tell u, a child or infant who is used to bottel feeding will never accept breastfeeding at that age (even infants of 5-6 month dont).
I have seen my chotu cousins.
5 age difference
it is just of 9 months to 1 year.
There have been popular shows like gulaal, karol baugh were female lead was elder to male by 8-6 years.
I saw one show on v about couples were in 1 couple girl was older to guy by 10years.
There are many celebrity couples with where female is elder and my best frn' s bf is younger to her by 3 yrs. Neither hers and boys family nor their frn circle had any objection.
6 ok in many muslims family there are consanginous marriages.
ln a Hindus, marriages among maternal cousins are accepted.( i mean a lady will not mind her brother's daughter or son for her son or daughter .
Such relationship are not considered taboos in our society when medical science does not favour such marriages as they are succeptible to genetic problems.
And yuvi and mukata toh phir bhi does not share any family relation.

Count me in.i preferred yukta rite from the beginning and after reading ur post my vote goes to yukta.

veer had legally adopted mukta. He gave those papers to iccha in one episode with her name as mukta veer singht bundela. sorry we cannot accept their pairing.

Originally posted by: Newveechafan

veer had legally adopted mukta. He gave those papers to iccha in one episode with her name as mukta veer singht bundela. sorry we cannot accept their pairing.

ok so adoption is the only reason, thats why u believe they are bro-sis or are there other reasons.
Because in hindus there is just not legal adoption but special pooja is done and then that child belongs rightfully to those parent.
Such pooja was shown?
Because they might have adopted her for some time but when they realised that she is tapsya's daughter they must have cancelled it and given her right to jogi.
Such legal adoption which was for short duration and later which was canceled
does not make them bro sis.
There is difference between guardian and parents!
Best answer will be given by iccha as, i want see when yukta happens whether she will scream" nahi yeh bhai behan hai" or whether she will be happy to see mukku as her daughter in law ,whom she loves equally like her daughter.
After reading all post ,and on my knowledge about story of this show and after analysing it i strongly believe there is no ethical religious and social problem in yukta.
So those who don't like yukta i respect their opinion but those who are yukta fan they have their right to express their feeling.
As there are ameetha fans and mukam fans there are yukta fans too.
They should have a yukta apperciation thread where they can discuss and express their opinion without disturbing other and without intruded by other.
Every1 will be happy no fights:-)
ok just explain me why yuvraj bundela is not rathore and mukta rathore no longer a bundela?.
If u can give valid ans and have points to prove point presented by me as wrong, i promise i will not support yukta and never come to this forum( as u can see i came here for yukta and many new member are attracted for the same reason)
i will continue to support yukta unless iccha screams nahi. .. (u know what is next)
if this adoption had lasted for while or if mukta and uv had been raised together even for a month or had emotional bonding as bro sis then the yukta was wrong!
Tell me atleast for 1day mukku and yuvi were in 1 house where both iccha and veer played wid them and treated both of them as bro sis?
Do u think cv of indian show are too bold or mad to show uv lusting for his own sister then why he calls meethi chutki and does not have same feeling like mukta.
Hmm if you can give me a valid answer i will say tata till then i think i will come to see the new frns i will make here specially yukta fans

this is first time ... i write in uttaran forum ... ur right ... I also support... y😊uktha fans...

Veer n iccha never considered themselves as mere guardians of kanha n mukta. They considered themselves as the parents of these kids only. And iccha saying thet r bhai behn etc , it is all decided by cvs. They change everything according to their convenience. If they had planned yukta, they will go on with. Then how can iccha go against it. But some of us can never support their relation. But please dont come to a conclusion that people r opposing yukta because they want aman mukta as a pair. For me I can stand neither mukta nor aman n dont really care abt their story.So it has nothing to do with my opposition for yukta. And abt yuvi n mukku staying in the same house. They did n please watch it properly n now i know that people will say They were too small then n only for a few days they were in the same house etc.

Originally posted by: Newveechafan

Veer n iccha never considered themselves as mere guardians of kanha n mukta. They considered themselves as the parents of these kids only.

i m saying same thing but my interpretation is different from yours. guardian is one who are like parents who take care of the kids but doesn't have permanent authority over them. veecha are like parents but not parents. they did not raised her and she is not using verer's name any more.

although veecha loved her like their own daughter and wanted to adopt them, they stlll remain guardian. iccha can be considered as parents to kanha but not mukta. similarly jogi for mukta but not veer.

And iccha saying thet r bhai behn etc , it is all decided by cvs. They change everything according to their convenience. If they had planned yukta, they will go on with. Then how can iccha go against it.

i feel cvs had planned it before leap, that is y they never showed yukta bonding in childhood. only the temporary adoption is making you uncomfortable i feel.

But some of us can never support their relation.

and some of us love yukta as couple, every one cant be same. may be your orthodox and i m liberal that doesnot make you and me wrong, we right at our place.. i always form a opinion after putting myself in one's position. if i was iccha , i never would have minded if my son had fallen for my friends daughter who is like daughter too me.as long as they don't have or had sibling bonding. in fact i will be happy to see that girl as my dil , whom i wanted to adopt as daughter once upon a time😃 .

But please dont come to a conclusion that people r opposing yukta because they want aman mukta as a pair. For me I can stand neither mukta nor aman n dont really care abt their story.So it has nothing to do with my opposition for yukta.

i never referred you specifically , i formed this opinion based on reading the post of people who had major problem with age-gap , and they preferred mukaam for same reason. and conveniently labelled yukta as bro sis. And abt yuvi n mukku staying in the same house. They did n please watch it properly n now i know that people will say They were too small then n only for a few days they were in the same house etc.

r u referring to iccha's visit at rathore's place wid mukku to feed uv. but even there she never treated them as sibling. if after rescue of uv , when veecha knew that uv is their son, i want to know whether that time mukta and uv were at veer's house. if yes then just tell me epi no, i will watch and then give my opinion

pip23, natzzz, kath1, TRULYNANDINI, zanish_k, roja1305, divyababu,

please watch episodes of first week of march . all the 3 kids were in bzoo. And u know. Iccha was calling veer "theen bachon ke papa" Isnt that enough to maken them bro sis?

}]]

Originally posted by: Newveechafan

please watch episodes of first week of march . all the 3 kids were in bzoo. And u know. Iccha was calling veer "theen bachon ke papa" Isnt that enough to maken them bro sis?