I'm sorry, but the evidence, the ample bit of it that was provided, was kind of NOT in favour of SRK.
NO witnesses said that the guard was "abusing" the kids
The evidence only kinda let it be known that SRK began to abuse him, call him shit, question his origins (when in fact, SRK's own origins weren't much to brag off at the beginning of his career)
And there's no evidence of the guard's "abusing" the kids either. If his strictly warning the kids from trespassing equaled to 'abuse' to SRK, then is that valid?
SRK"s verbal abuse to the guard--> was that prized behaviour either?
and lets think consider even more basic assumptions. What in the world would that guard gain from abusing SRK's kids, in front of thousands of people, din-dahaade? Does he love the idea of having his job sacked, his image tarnished as a child molester?
4