Possessive Shivji

Hi all,

After todays episode Just wanted everyone to think about Shivji being possessive about Sati...he cudnt tolerate the fact that Sati disguised herself as Lord Ramas wife to test Lord Ram (Lord Vishnu)

Just a thought...

no...shivji is not possessive...what he was said correct...when Lord Rama searching for seetha suddenly matha Seetha appears and again gone is not good thing it will create pain to Lord Rama

shiv regarded sita as his mother so when he saw sati in disguise of sita,he got angry as his wife went in disguise of a woman whom he treats as his mother.shiv is not possessive about sati.

Shiv was correct . Sati. should not have done that.

I am surprised Sati is shown taking on Sita's form- as she had promised Shivji that she would always obey him- you know all those vachans etc., they showed- I am surprised they have shown her as shallow- even human beings if they love someone would heed the pledges given to their beloved. I am just wondering if this story is really there ( if in some versions of the Ramayan and Puran- depends who interpreted the purans).

Originally posted by: reima

I am surprised Sati is shown taking on Sita's form- as she had promised Shivji that she would always obey him- you know all those vachans etc., they showed- I am surprised they have shown her as shallow- even human beings if they love someone would heed the pledges given to their beloved. I am just wondering if this story is really there ( if in some versions of the Ramayan and Puran- depends who interpreted the purans).

Even if they have shown it this way, the fact is Ram existed in different yuga only, this story is not there is Devi Puran. Let it be there is any Ramayan, I refuse to accept this always showing Sati down version. If they are refering to Puranas then none of them mentions Sati as a human.