Anandi's status after divorce - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

2.7k

Users

9

Likes

40

Frequent Posters

Missesha thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: tinoo

Miseesha --

I wouldnt worry too much about gauri claiming her rights on the haveli and anandi being thrown out.
Even if gauri becomes the legal wife of jagya, she does not automatically become the legal owner of the haveli. It is the owners of the haveli who will decide who can stay there and who cannot rightfully stay there.
As far as anandi is concerned, I am sure that she has the werewithal to build her own haveli. she is enterprising and bold -- and has founded her own schools, and has expertise in running the financial aspects and administration of the hospital (remember she is the signatory authority on the hospital's chequebook). She is capable of doing what she wants to.
She is not a poverty-stricken/lack mentality person like gauri to constantly eye others' property and havelis and constantly trying to tally and collect debts from others.

I agree :-)
567043 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: tinoo

Miseesha,


Jagya, at a later date, can stake a clame to only inherited property (which there is none here). Dadisa was very poor, and built everything on her own (earned property) -- so Jagya has no claim on dadisa's earned property -- that is free will -- she can put it in the name of whomever she wants since she is the legal owner of the money and the haveli.
And why should J-G come back to the haveli -- if dadisa leaves it to Basant and to nandu, gauri wont be able to stake a claim to anything!! 😃



Your presumption is legally incorrect. It is the SONS ( & DAUGHTERS) who have no legal lien on Dadisa's self created wealth & property.All her GRANDCHILDREN have an equal LEGAL right to her property.Any will excluding one of the "natural heirs" is open to litigation. That is the correct LEGAL position

woman11 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#13
This is an explanation from a lawyer:

"The property which was inherited by the father/Hindu man also becomes his self acquired property & hence he can dispose off all his self acquired including one he had inherited from someone in favor of any person he likes during his lifetime or after his death by making 'Will' in terms & conditions to anyone name as the beneficiary.

In this case the Hindu Person/Father has name a particular person to get the property that was acquired by him through some sources & has named all his legal Heirs to acquire & share the other inherited property equally amongst themselves. The terms of the 'Will' is very clear with regard to all his property,this is a Valid 'Will' unless proved Void in the court of law on any other issues with regard to its execution & mental condition of the Hindu Person/father while making such 'Will'.

The property inherited by the father from the grand father become his self acquired property,the grand sons/daughters have no right to inherit the property of the grand father under the Hindu Succession Act,1956 if their father is alive. So the father got this inherited property from the grand father rest he acquired himself & he disposed off the whole property as he wished by way of making 'Will'"--👏

Lawyer Vijay M

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".