RISTA BROKEN 26.3
News, Views and Gossip
Khans' era might finally be over
Statement by star plus regarding kskbt2
"Won't play these hairy, angry men" Imran attacks Ranbir & Ranveer
Short story of a successful (Naya) safar
Vrinang set new record : Highest time spent.
Aneet Padda Sister Reet Calls Dhurandhar Propaganda Film
Rakesh Bedi Enjoying After Dhurandhar
Bhansali remembers Ranveer again
Sara Arjun to be paired w Ishaan Khatter
Aditya Dhar and Ranveer Singh To Collaborate Again
Happy Ram Navami
I was thinking it form this point that after divorce if J-G remarry legally then for sure G will claim her rights as bahu and in that case she may want Anandi out of house as she no longer wedded beendni of Jagya.
So in that case what are legal grounds for Anandi to stay back? Emotionally singhs will welcome A as long as she wants to stay, but G is just waiting for one point to throw A out of haveli and this will be a very easy catch for her.
The haveli belongs to the Singhs. Not JG. Its their (DS) decision who they want to stay in the haveli with.Originally posted by: Missesha
Thanks for replying,
I was thinking it form this point that after divorce if J-G remarry legally then for sure G will claim her rights as bahu and in that case she may want Anandi out of house as she no longer wedded beendni of Jagya.
So in that case what are legal grounds for Anandi to stay back? Emotionally singhs will welcome A as long as she wants to stay, but G is just waiting for one point to throw A out of haveli and this will be a very easy catch for her.
Yes, I suppose A will be quite secured since Singhs love her dearly, so they will look after her until she re-marries.
Jagya, at a later date, can stake a clame to only inherited property (which there is none here). Dadisa was very poor, and built everything on her own (earned property) -- so Jagya has no claim on dadisa's earned property -- that is free will -- she can put it in the name of whomever she wants since she is the legal owner of the money and the haveli.
I feel, that clause will not be applicable here. This law applies for Ancestral Property only, ie if it remains in family undivided for 5 generations. ie if the haveli property is not divided till the time of Jagya's grandchild, that grandchild can stake full claim on the property Since all the properties are earned by Dadisa, Bhairon will legally inherit it and it is upto Bhairon, on who should get the property after his death.Originally posted by: Manasi_16
Just one point here...in order to keep J-G away from the property, Dadisa will have to legally disown Jagya. If DS dies intestate (w/o a will) then Jagya can stake full claim on the property. It is DS's hard-earned money, so only she can decide whom to give & whom not to. But after her, Bhairon cannot legally stop jagya from getting his share of the inheritance.
So lets hope, DS makes her succession & inheritance very clear