Anandi's status after divorce

Missesha thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
Hi everyone,
I am happy to know that with the help of this divorce, A will be able to move on in life.
However, I am concerned, what will be her legal status in Singh family and what will be her legal rights?
I mean currently no one can question A's status of beendni socially, legally or out of emotion, because it's not only her choice but also her right to live in haveli.
But after divorce A will not be a socially or legally accepted bahu of singhs and this means G- J can easily question on her status in haveli.
Being a mistress, G can't tolerate A staying in haveli, what will she do when J-A marriage would have got nullified?
What are your thoughts?

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

2.7k

Users

9

Likes

40

Frequent Posters

731627 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
nahi yeh ek personal matter hai aap jis pur trust karte hain uske naam aap property kar sakte hain jaroori nahi uska aap se koi rishta ho .ek baar ek news aayi thi ek ne foreign mein dog ke naam property kar di thi .
tinoo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3
Miseesha,
All these matters are part and parcel of a divorce -- alimony for the ex-wife, maintenance for any children that are there -- the courts ensure that the wife will most definitely get her share.
The divorce proceedings are a tool to empower the abandoned wife, not to punish her even more.
In addition, I am sure that bhairon will ensure that she is well endowed with property and finances for her future even if she is to be his ex-daughter in law.
There may be another procedure he initiates to adopt anandi as his daughter 😃.
Anyway, there have been many discussions on this forum about earned property vs inherited property.
Jagya, at a later date, can stake a clame to only inherited property (which there is none here). Dadisa was very poor, and built everything on her own (earned property) -- so Jagya has no claim on dadisa's earned property -- that is free will -- she can put it in the name of whomever she wants since she is the legal owner of the money and the haveli.
And why should J-G come back to the haveli -- if dadisa leaves it to Basant and to nandu, gauri wont be able to stake a claim to anything!! 😃
Missesha thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
Thanks for replying,

I was thinking it form this point that after divorce if J-G remarry legally then for sure G will claim her rights as bahu and in that case she may want Anandi out of house as she no longer wedded beendni of Jagya.

So in that case what are legal grounds for Anandi to stay back? Emotionally singhs will welcome A as long as she wants to stay, but G is just waiting for one point to throw A out of haveli and this will be a very easy catch for her.

poiu123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: Missesha

Thanks for replying,

I was thinking it form this point that after divorce if J-G remarry legally then for sure G will claim her rights as bahu and in that case she may want Anandi out of house as she no longer wedded beendni of Jagya.

So in that case what are legal grounds for Anandi to stay back? Emotionally singhs will welcome A as long as she wants to stay, but G is just waiting for one point to throw A out of haveli and this will be a very easy catch for her.

The haveli belongs to the Singhs. Not JG. Its their (DS) decision who they want to stay in the haveli with.
J has been disowned by Singhs and JG are not welcome in the haveli. G has no rights to throw anyone out of her in-laws property.
718143 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6
I think Bhairo will adopt anandi as his daughter. But does anyone know whether one can adopt an adult as a daughter?

There will be more tamasha from dactaar madam in the haveli about throwing anandi out of the haveli. But I think when dadisa decides upon something, she foresees all future problems, and makes arrangements accordingly.

I think dadisa has a proper plan to execute this efficiently...
Missesha thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#7

Yes, I suppose A will be quite secured since Singhs love her dearly, so they will look after her until she re-marries.

As far as J is concerned, Singhs disown him and I have no idea on what legal action can a disowned son take against his family.
I think the only reason for worry would arise if
- JG marry legally and
- If J claims his rights in Singh family (given there is legally a way out), the both J-G will be able to point at A.
Only then A would have a reason to worry, otherwise this divorce has more benefits for A than negatives
Manasi_16 thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Enthusiast Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 13 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: tinoo


Jagya, at a later date, can stake a clame to only inherited property (which there is none here). Dadisa was very poor, and built everything on her own (earned property) -- so Jagya has no claim on dadisa's earned property -- that is free will -- she can put it in the name of whomever she wants since she is the legal owner of the money and the haveli.



Just one point here...in order to keep J-G away from the property, Dadisa will have to legally disown Jagya. If DS dies intestate (w/o a will) then Jagya can stake full claim on the property. It is DS's hard-earned money, so only she can decide whom to give & whom not to. But after her, Bhairon cannot legally stop jagya from getting his share of the inheritance.

So lets hope, DS makes her succession & inheritance very clear

tinoo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9
Miseesha --
I wouldnt worry too much about gauri claiming her rights on the haveli and anandi being thrown out.
Even if gauri becomes the legal wife of jagya, she does not automatically become the legal owner of the haveli. It is the owners of the haveli who will decide who can stay there and who cannot rightfully stay there.
As far as anandi is concerned, I am sure that she has the werewithal to build her own haveli. she is enterprising and bold -- and has founded her own schools, and has expertise in running the financial aspects and administration of the hospital (remember she is the signatory authority on the hospital's chequebook). She is capable of doing what she wants to.
She is not a poverty-stricken/lack mentality person like gauri to constantly eye others' property and havelis and constantly trying to tally and collect debts from others.
lakshmim_84 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: Manasi_16



Just one point here...in order to keep J-G away from the property, Dadisa will have to legally disown Jagya. If DS dies intestate (w/o a will) then Jagya can stake full claim on the property. It is DS's hard-earned money, so only she can decide whom to give & whom not to. But after her, Bhairon cannot legally stop jagya from getting his share of the inheritance.

So lets hope, DS makes her succession & inheritance very clear

I feel, that clause will not be applicable here. This law applies for Ancestral Property only, ie if it remains in family undivided for 5 generations. ie if the haveli property is not divided till the time of Jagya's grandchild, that grandchild can stake full claim on the property Since all the properties are earned by Dadisa, Bhairon will legally inherit it and it is upto Bhairon, on who should get the property after his death.
The only way Jagya can stake full claim, is if by some unfortunate reasons, Dadisa, Bhairon and Sumitra die without leaving a will.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".