DS Not Losing her throne.

Add123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 13 years ago
#1

Hey Guyz 😃

I've been whisking over the forum, and from what I've seen, people are assuming that Mahrana Prithvi said that DS loses her throne ... 😳
But what I think he meant was the fact that after DS, no other successor will be chosen from her family, not even Jay ... DS is still the queen ... however after she retires from the throne, no one from her family can take over, Manyata was meant to be crowned but due to her crappy tantrums ... she has lost that honour ... and her actions will most effectively affect her own family, I don't know what will happen in the future regarding Manyata, Devgadh, and the throne ... but for now DS is still the queen, but after her no other person from her family can take charge ... That's the most probable defination of Mahrana Prithvi's words ... I believe. 😊
Plus, They can't just say a "Royal" ... you're not a "Royal" anymore ... similarily ... they can't say a "queen" that you ain't a "queen" anymore. 😉
So this was me, just trying to express my thoughts on that, Don't know if anyone has posted anything similar to this. 😊
Do leave your opinions, and do hit "Like" if you agree 😃
Thanks!
:-ADDEN-:

Created

Last reply

Replies

2

Views

605

Users

3

Likes

8

Frequent Posters

-SilverAngel- thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
What I perceived it meant was:

That DS needs to step down as she has not been able to contain the problem effectively and only controlled it when it became a public mess. So I think he meant that somebody else has to step up and take her place. That person could be from her family too but she will not be the queen anymore, everything/ power/ status/ decision making would not be under her hands now... so we have to see who the successor is going to be?

Just my perception!.. could be wrong though
708922 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Adden123

Hey Guyz 😃

I've been whisking over the forum, and from what I've seen, people are assuming that Mahrana Prithvi said that DS loses her throne ... 😳
But what I think he meant was the fact that after DS, no other successor will be chosen from her family, not even Jay ... DS is still the queen ... however after she retires from the throne, no one from her family can take over, Manyata was meant to be crowned but due to her crappy tantrums ... she has lost that honour ... and her actions will most effectively affect her own family, I don't know what will happen in the future regarding Manyata, Devgadh, and the throne ... but for now DS is still the queen, but after her no other person from her family can take charge ... That's the most probable defination of Mahrana Prithvi's words ... I believe. 😊
Plus, They can't just say a "Royal" ... you're not a "Royal" anymore ... similarily ... they can't say a "queen" that you ain't a "queen" anymore. 😉
So this was me, just trying to express my thoughts on that, Don't know if anyone has posted anything similar to this. 😊
Do leave your opinions, and do hit "Like" if you agree 😃
Thanks!
:-ADDEN-:


I agree perhaps there will be no heir, that would be a lot better and make for more interesting storyline. interesting insight 😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".