Posted:
Everyone is faulting ichcha and divya and nani and what not.
My irritation is with Veer and rathore both.
1. He knew both sides of the story. Tapasya losing daughter and Ichcha coming back with same age child. He knew tapasya lost dauhgter on rainy night. Ichcha found mukta on rainy night.
Was there no point at which even a dim lightbulb went off in his mind that it might be an angle to investigate (even if he saw the remotest of remote possibilities?)
2. Yesterday, he is saying "Ichcha I thought you had gone to the police and advertised in papers"
How can he think she has advertised ? A newspaper ad costs no less than 25,000 rs. It is not a cheap affair.
An illiterate maid and her daughter who works on commission selling insurance policies and (not even fixed salary) ... do they have those kinds of financial resources to put an ad in the paper?
And how can he think that she had done everything already? In terms of simply assuming it?
were police records not required during the adoption process? Can one just go in to a court room and tell the judge "I found a girl on the road, and we cant find her parents so we want to adopt?"
Did the judge not ask for the police records
And rathore ...
He has decorated his room full of pictures of yuvraj ... but not one little picture of the girl he lost?
Even if it is a bad memory, there was not one photo anywhere in the house where ichcha could have seen it and put it together?
Same with tapasya and divya and thakur -- no photo of the child anywhere in their house either?
Whatever foto rathore was giving to the ads, and whatever foto jogi gave to the police, that same photo could they not have blown up and kept in their living room?
Really ridiculous.
Mr And Mrs Parshuram
