Tarakasur track going all wrong - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

5.5k

Users

9

Likes

44

Frequent Posters

maxknight80 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Sweet24


Once upon a time, when king of Mountain- Himalaya goes with his wife Maina to meet Shivji and take blessings from them. When Maina saw Sati there, she just cant move her eyes from her, she think that my daughter must be like Sati. When Shivji notices this and said that you will got daughter just like Sati.

When they gone, Sati asked that why did you give such boon to them, how come they get daughter like me? to which Shivji replied you don't worry.

When Parvati was born, that time tarakasur had defeated the Indra. When he got to know that Parvati was born and she will marry Shiv then he sent troops to kill parvati, these troops was killed by Parvati's elder sister Ganga.
Parvati has come with her all Shaktiayas, so she also kill demons, but secretly. Parvati has done about 3000 yrs of tapasya, then Indra send Kamdev to awake Shivji from his dyaan, and then u all know.

Actually you are right
Sati was only the human manifestation of Shakti, that's why she was bound by the cycles of Life and Death and could not remain with Shiva for eternity. She had to die so that parvati could be born as you have correctly mentioned.
Parvati is the Savgun Swaroop (Complete Manifestation) of Shakti, that's why she has all her powers and is of eternal age like Shiva.
MAX
kkr531 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#12
yup i agree with the posts tarakasur should not have been brought in so early. Moreover i would also like to mention that daksh was not so anti- shiva as being portrayed of course he is was unhappy to give his daughter to shiva but not so arrogant and devious as being shown.

rivalry only intensified after chandrama episode as daksh was enraged that the one cursed by him has been saved by shiva. ardent vaishnavistic portrayal of daksha is also not in line with scriptures. also portrayal of prasuti in negative light is also not correct as she was the one who helped sati in completing nanda vrat.

it doesn't mean that i dont like the show i only wanted to mention all these so that wrong information is not conveyed to audience. as the show is quiet popular.


john909 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: kkr531

yup i agree with the posts tarakasur should not have been brought in so early. Moreover i would also like to mention that daksh was not so anti- shiva as being portrayed of course he is was unhappy to give his daughter to shiva but not so arrogant and devious as being shown.

rivalry only intensified after chandrama episode as daksh was enraged that the one cursed by him has been saved by shiva. ardent vaishnavistic portrayal of daksha is also not in line with scriptures. also portrayal of prasuti in negative light is also not correct as she was the one who helped sati in completing nanda vrat.

it doesn't mean that i dont like the show i only wanted to mention all these so that wrong information is not conveyed to audience. as the show is quiet popular.



you are right about the daksha. the whole enimity thing started at one occasion after shiv and sati got married. there was this one time where shiva was participating in one of the yagya and when daksha entered, everybody got up from their seat as a sign of respect but shiva being our bholanath, did nt get up and this offended daksha. after that that hatred grew and finally he stopped inviting shiv and sati to further such occasions. one time sati got to know about some yagya and she went there without invitation and rest everyone knows.
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#14
As long as they don't show Tarakasur personally attacking Sati, things are ok. After Sati's death he must have realised he can not be killed & started troubling devas, he took over Indraloka by defeating the Devas & returned it only when Brahmaji asked him to do so & met his end at Kartikeya's hand.
Edited by mnx12 - 13 years ago
Sweet24 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: maxknight80

Actually you are right
Sati was only the human manifestation of Shakti, that's why she was bound by the cycles of Life and Death and could not remain with Shiva for eternity. She had to die so that parvati could be born as you have correctly mentioned.
Parvati is the Savgun Swaroop (Complete Manifestation) of Shakti, that's why she has all her powers and is of eternal age like Shiva.
MAX


thanks Max

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".